Rehabilitating (Stroke-induced) Apraxia With Direct Current Stimulation

NCT ID: NCT03185234

Last Updated: 2022-05-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

117 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-23

Study Completion Date

2021-11-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of the clinical trial is to investigate whether weak transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can ameliorate the motor cognitive deficit apraxia during stroke rehabilitation. Stroke patients with apraxia will either receive a real stimulation or a sham stimulation (placebo) for 10 minutes at a time on 5 consecutive days during their in-patient stay in a rehabilitation center. Additionally, motor tasks are performed before and after the stimulation. The effect of the weak current stimulation on motor function is assessed 3-4 days after the last stimulation and 3 months after enrollment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Despite the high incidence of the motor cognitive deficit apraxia after left-hemispheric stroke, evidence-based therapies do not exist. This randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) investigates whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as an add-on therapy during neuro-rehabilitation can ameliorate apraxic deficits in patients with left hemisphere stroke. Therefore, anodal tDCS is applied over the parietal cortex of the left, lesioned hemisphere with an intensity of 2 mA for 10 minutes at a time on 5 consecutive days in combination with motor tasks before and after the stimulation. The effect of the stimulation is compared to a sham stimulation. Moreover, application of a pre-programmed study mode ensures a double-blind study design (patient and investigator). The performance in the apraxia test KAS (Cologne Apraxia Screening) 3-4 days after the last stimulation, compared to baseline, serves as primary endpoint of the study. Secondary endpoints are evaluated using various apraxia tests, motor tests and neuropsychological tests 3-4 days after the last stimulation and 3 months after enrollment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Apraxia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Real tDCS

Anodal tDCS at an intensity of 2 mA is applied for 10 minutes at a time on 5 consecutive days. The anodal electrode is placed over the left parietal cortex (P3 in 10/20 EEG) of the lesioned hemisphere, the cathodal electrode is located supraorbital on the right side. Motor tasks are performed before and after the stimulation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

anodal tDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

2 mA, 10 min, 5 sessions

Sham tDCS

Sham stimulation is applied for 10 minutes at a time on 5 consecutive days. One electrode is placed over the left parietal cortex (P3 in 10/20 EEG) of the lesioned hemisphere and a second electrode supraorbital on the right side. Motor tasks are performed before and after the stimulation.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

sham tDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

sham stimulation, 10 min, 5 sessions

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

anodal tDCS

2 mA, 10 min, 5 sessions

Intervention Type DEVICE

sham tDCS

sham stimulation, 10 min, 5 sessions

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

neuroConn DCS, model no. 008 neuroConn DCS, model no. 008

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* left hemispheric ischemic stroke in the subacute/ chronic phase (\>10 days and \<180 days post-stroke)
* clinical confirmation of apraxia by KAS (Cologne Apraxia Screening), Cut-off ≤ 76/ 80 points;
* age 18 - 90 years;
* written Informed Consent

Exclusion Criteria

* pregnancy, breastfeeding and women without exclusion of pregnancy
* patients with clinical manifestation of a stroke prior to the index-stroke
* malignant disease with affection of central nervous system
* life expectancy \<12 months
* current addiction to alcohol or drugs or other addictive disease (exception: nicotine)
* current clinically manifest psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia or severe depressive episode
* epileptic seizure within the past two years
* continuous medication during the intervention phase with benzodiazepine, antipsychotics of high potential and anti-epileptic drugs taken for prophylaxis of epileptic seizures
* enrollment in other studies with brain stimulation in the time period after the index stroke
* heart pacemaker
* electrodes for deep brain stimulation or other metal implants in the head (expected are dental fillings and inlays)
* craniectomy or trepanation
* vulnerable skin lesions at electrode positions
* poor motivation/ cooperation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Cologne

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gereon R. Fink

Univ.-Prof. Dr. med.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gereon R. Fink, Univ-Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital Cologne

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rehabilitationszentrum Godeshöhe e.V.

Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

MediClin Fachklinik Rhein/Ruhr für Neurologie

Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kleineberg NN, Richter MK, Becker I, Weiss PH, Fink GR. Verum versus sham tDCS in the treatment of stroke-induced apraxia: study protocol of the randomized controlled trial RAdiCS -"Rehabilitating (stroke-induced) Apraxia with direct Current Stimulation". Neurol Res Pract. 2020 Mar 4;2:7. doi: 10.1186/s42466-020-0052-y. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33324913 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1195-2536

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

DRKS00012292

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Uni-Koeln-3033

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

TDCS in Acute Stroke
NCT01701713 UNKNOWN NA