TDCS and Aphasia Therapy in the Acute Phase After Stroke

NCT ID: NCT03297450

Last Updated: 2024-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-02

Study Completion Date

2018-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates the neuromodulatory effect of combined tDCS and aphasia therapy in patients in the acute stage after stroke. Half of the participants will receive aphasia therapy and tDCS, the other half will receive aphasia therapy and sham-tDCS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aphasia is present in about one third of all stroke patients in the acute phase. The first few months after stroke, considerable spontaneous recovery is initiated, including neuronal plasticity and reorganization processes. Language recovery in aphasic stroke patients involves reorganization of brain functions. Longitudinal fMRI studies reveal that the right hemisphere shows increased activity at different times in the recovery process, but in the long-term is correlated with poorer performance. Left re-lateralization, if possible, seems to be the most effective in restoring language function. For a large subgroup of patients, aphasia therapy is not sufficient to resolve language deficits and not all patients are capable to endure intensive aphasia therapy. Therefore, non-invasive techniques (NIBS) such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are currently explored as an add-on treatment to improve or accelerate therapy outcomes. tDCS is a painless and safe stimulation tool that modulates cortical excitability through weak polarizing currents (1 mA - 2 mA) between two electrodes. These weak currents are thought to induce a subthreshold shift of resting membrane potentials towards depolarization or hyperpolarization. The effects of stimulation depend on the polarity of the applied current relative to the axonal orientation. It has been found that tDCS not only triggers immediate aftereffects, but also long-lasting effects that persist beyond the stimulation time, even for up to 12 months. It was suggested that long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) might be responsible for these long-term effects, however the precise physiologic mechanisms of action are not yet fully understood.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

aphasia therapy (45 minutes) in combination with (sham or real) tDCS (20 minutes)
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Aphasia therapy and tDCS

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

tDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

C-tDCS during the first 20 minutes of aphasia therapy, at an intensity of 1mA

Aphasia therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Based on linguistic tests, individualized aphasia therapy will be provided

Aphasia therapy and sham-tDCS

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Aphasia therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Based on linguistic tests, individualized aphasia therapy will be provided

Sham-tDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

tDCS during the first 20 minutes of aphasia therapy at an intensity of 0mA (Sham)

Standard of care and sham-tDCS

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham-tDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

tDCS during the first 20 minutes of aphasia therapy at an intensity of 0mA (Sham)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

tDCS

C-tDCS during the first 20 minutes of aphasia therapy, at an intensity of 1mA

Intervention Type DEVICE

Aphasia therapy

Based on linguistic tests, individualized aphasia therapy will be provided

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Sham-tDCS

tDCS during the first 20 minutes of aphasia therapy at an intensity of 0mA (Sham)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosed with mild-moderate aphasia (Token Test Score between 7 and 40)
* Inclusion in the first few days after stroke (acute phase)
* Age 18 - 85 years
* Being right-handed
* Mothertongue: Dutch
* Able to undergo functional and specific linguistic testing and therapy in the acute phase following stroke
* Imaging (CT or MRI) prior to inclusion (standard of care)
* Signed Informed Consent

Exclusion Criteria

* History of other diseases of the central nervous system, psychological disorders and (developmental) speech and or language disorders
* Serious non-linguistic, cognitive disorders (as documented in the patients' medical history and inquired in anamneses)
* Prior brain surgery
* Excessive use of alcohol or drugs
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Veerle De Herdt, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Ghent

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Ghent

Ghent, East-Flanders, Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EC2017/0906

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

TDCS in Acute Stroke
NCT01701713 UNKNOWN NA
Evaluating Anodal tDCS Preceding Aphasia Therapy
NCT02249819 TERMINATED PHASE1/PHASE2
Post-Stroke Aphasia TMS
NCT06974279 RECRUITING NA