Electro-physiological Signs to Prognostic Aphasia Recovery After a Stroke
NCT ID: NCT03103230
Last Updated: 2017-04-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
130 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-04-30
2016-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
TDCS and Aphasia Therapy in the Acute Phase After Stroke
NCT03297450
TDCS and Aphasia Therapy in the Chronic Phase After Stroke
NCT03305614
Exploration of Repeated High-frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Acute Phase Aphasia in Post-stroke Patients
NCT06787508
Clinic and Neurophysiology of Aphasia Treatment
NCT05572385
Post-Stroke Aphasia TMS
NCT06974279
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There are close links between motor system and language, either at production or comprehension, and more particularly concerning the motricity of the hand or lips. The cortical excitability of motor areas of the right upper limb is thus modified by the language in healthy subjects, but also in the aphasic person.
* Purpose : The main: to study, among the aphasic person, if Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP) performed within the first 14 days after a stroke can predict a good recovery from aphasia 6 months of the initial episode.
* Detailed description: All aphasic stroke patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic damages will be proposed for inclusion. All patients will benefit in the acute phase of an aphasia evaluation, and a clinical evaluation. All patients will have a study of motor evoked potentials (abductor pollicis brevis and orbicularis oris) less than 14 days from stroke. The investigators will evaluate the aphasia 3 and 6 months after stroke, to determinate if MEP can predict a good recovery of aphasia.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Motor Evoked Potentials
Patients with aphasia after a stroke
Cortical magnetic stimulation
Motor Evoked Potentials of lips and hand recorded after cortical magnetic stimulation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cortical magnetic stimulation
Motor Evoked Potentials of lips and hand recorded after cortical magnetic stimulation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* With aphasia (-1 language analysis in the acute phase and severity of the questionnaire LAST (Flamand-Roze, Falissard et al. 2011))
* Right-handed (Edinburgh Handedness Inventory)
* Free of dementia before stroke
* Older than 18 years
* French
* Able to hold a sitting in chair.
* Included in maximum 14 days after stroke
* Patient social security system
* Free Consent, informed writing signed by the participant or the person of confidence and the investigator (no later than the day of inclusion and before any examination required by research)
Exclusion Criteria
* Impaired alertness
* Dementia prior to stroke
* Illiteracy
* Severe dysarthria
* Previous psychiatric history requiring hospitalization in a specialized environment for more than two months
* Pregnant
* Major visual or auditory perceptual disorder
* Previous epilepsy or seizures in hyperacute phase of stroke
* Treatment strongly interacting with GABAergic or glutamatergic system
* Contraindication to MEP: clip intracranial ferromagnetic pacemakers, cochlear implant, intracerebral stimulator.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Bordeaux
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
GLIZE Bertrand, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital Bordeaux, France, EA 4136 Univ. Bordeaux, France
PICAT Quitterie, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Unité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche Clinique
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dickey, L., A. Kagan, et al. (2010).
El Hachioui, H., H. F. Lingsma, et al. (2013).
Fadiga L, Craighero L, Buccino G, Rizzolatti G. Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study. Eur J Neurosci. 2002 Jan;15(2):399-402. doi: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01874.x.
Meister IG, Wilson SM, Deblieck C, Wu AD, Iacoboni M. The essential role of premotor cortex in speech perception. Curr Biol. 2007 Oct 9;17(19):1692-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.064. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
Meister IG, Sparing R, Foltys H, Gebert D, Huber W, Topper R, Boroojerdi B. Functional connectivity between cortical hand motor and language areas during recovery from aphasia. J Neurol Sci. 2006 Sep 25;247(2):165-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2006.04.003. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
Meister IG, Buelte D, Staedtgen M, Boroojerdi B, Sparing R. The dorsal premotor cortex orchestrates concurrent speech and fingertapping movements. Eur J Neurosci. 2009 May;29(10):2074-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06729.x. Epub 2009 May 9.
Tokimura H, Tokimura Y, Oliviero A, Asakura T, Rothwell JC. Speech-induced changes in corticospinal excitability. Ann Neurol. 1996 Oct;40(4):628-34. doi: 10.1002/ana.410400413.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CHUBX2013/08
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.