Electro-physiological Signs to Prognostic Aphasia Recovery After a Stroke

NCT ID: NCT03103230

Last Updated: 2017-04-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

130 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-04-30

Study Completion Date

2016-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to study, among the aphasic person, if motor function ( studied by Motor Evoked Potentials) performed within the first 14 days after a stroke can predict a good recovery from aphasia 6 months of the initial episode.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

• Background : Stroke affects approximately 130,000 people per year and communication disorders occur in 35% of cases, resulting in left brain damages. Aphasia is the main cause of these disorders. It is a sign of poor prognosis in the functional recovery after stroke. Recent studies have attempted to establish early clinical prognostic criteria to establish a predictive model of aphasia recovery. The issue of the possibility of prediction is important and can influence the rehabilitation treatment decided in the early days after stroke, with adequate guidance in rehabilitation structures.

There are close links between motor system and language, either at production or comprehension, and more particularly concerning the motricity of the hand or lips. The cortical excitability of motor areas of the right upper limb is thus modified by the language in healthy subjects, but also in the aphasic person.

* Purpose : The main: to study, among the aphasic person, if Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP) performed within the first 14 days after a stroke can predict a good recovery from aphasia 6 months of the initial episode.
* Detailed description: All aphasic stroke patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic damages will be proposed for inclusion. All patients will benefit in the acute phase of an aphasia evaluation, and a clinical evaluation. All patients will have a study of motor evoked potentials (abductor pollicis brevis and orbicularis oris) less than 14 days from stroke. The investigators will evaluate the aphasia 3 and 6 months after stroke, to determinate if MEP can predict a good recovery of aphasia.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Aphasia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Motor Evoked Potentials

Patients with aphasia after a stroke

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cortical magnetic stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Motor Evoked Potentials of lips and hand recorded after cortical magnetic stimulation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cortical magnetic stimulation

Motor Evoked Potentials of lips and hand recorded after cortical magnetic stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients with a left stroke (first clinical episode deficit) imaging confirmed.
* With aphasia (-1 language analysis in the acute phase and severity of the questionnaire LAST (Flamand-Roze, Falissard et al. 2011))
* Right-handed (Edinburgh Handedness Inventory)
* Free of dementia before stroke
* Older than 18 years
* French
* Able to hold a sitting in chair.
* Included in maximum 14 days after stroke
* Patient social security system
* Free Consent, informed writing signed by the participant or the person of confidence and the investigator (no later than the day of inclusion and before any examination required by research)

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal of the consent
* Impaired alertness
* Dementia prior to stroke
* Illiteracy
* Severe dysarthria
* Previous psychiatric history requiring hospitalization in a specialized environment for more than two months
* Pregnant
* Major visual or auditory perceptual disorder
* Previous epilepsy or seizures in hyperacute phase of stroke
* Treatment strongly interacting with GABAergic or glutamatergic system
* Contraindication to MEP: clip intracranial ferromagnetic pacemakers, cochlear implant, intracerebral stimulator.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Bordeaux

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

GLIZE Bertrand, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital Bordeaux, France, EA 4136 Univ. Bordeaux, France

PICAT Quitterie, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Unité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche Clinique

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Bordeaux

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dickey, L., A. Kagan, et al. (2010).

Reference Type RESULT

El Hachioui, H., H. F. Lingsma, et al. (2013).

Reference Type RESULT

Fadiga L, Craighero L, Buccino G, Rizzolatti G. Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study. Eur J Neurosci. 2002 Jan;15(2):399-402. doi: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01874.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11849307 (View on PubMed)

Meister IG, Wilson SM, Deblieck C, Wu AD, Iacoboni M. The essential role of premotor cortex in speech perception. Curr Biol. 2007 Oct 9;17(19):1692-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.064. Epub 2007 Sep 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17900904 (View on PubMed)

Meister IG, Sparing R, Foltys H, Gebert D, Huber W, Topper R, Boroojerdi B. Functional connectivity between cortical hand motor and language areas during recovery from aphasia. J Neurol Sci. 2006 Sep 25;247(2):165-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2006.04.003. Epub 2006 Jun 5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16737714 (View on PubMed)

Meister IG, Buelte D, Staedtgen M, Boroojerdi B, Sparing R. The dorsal premotor cortex orchestrates concurrent speech and fingertapping movements. Eur J Neurosci. 2009 May;29(10):2074-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06729.x. Epub 2009 May 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19453637 (View on PubMed)

Tokimura H, Tokimura Y, Oliviero A, Asakura T, Rothwell JC. Speech-induced changes in corticospinal excitability. Ann Neurol. 1996 Oct;40(4):628-34. doi: 10.1002/ana.410400413.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 8871583 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHUBX2013/08

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.