Effect of Anomia Rehabilitation Combined With Metacognitive Training in Patients With Chronic Vascular Aphasia
NCT ID: NCT06930131
Last Updated: 2025-04-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
18 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-02-21
2026-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Links Between Motor Abilities and Language Ability Deficits in Patients With Post-stroke Aphasia
NCT05776368
Predicting Language Recovery in Acute Stroke Patients in the Neurovascular Intensive Care Unit: An Exploratory Study With the Core Assessment of Language Processing.
NCT06817642
Studying Language With Brain Stimulation in Aphasia
NCT05660304
Executive Training and Anomia Therapy in Chronic Post-stroke Aphasia
NCT05101408
Efficacy of a Combined Linguistic/Communication Therapy in Acute Aphasia After Stroke
NCT03287544
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Moreover, a growing number of studies suggest combining metacognitive strategy training with language rehabilitation in brain-injured patients, particularly in reading comprehension, communication skills, and anomia, could improve cognitive and language recovery outcomes. In rehabilitation, metacognitive strategy training can be used to enhance and/or compensate for cognitive function deficits. Patients are repeatedly exposed to discrepancies between the patients performance evaluations and expectations. Findings indicate improvements in trained tasks and transfer effects to similar tasks.
While studies have examined the effects of linguistic training on one hand and the impact of metacognitive abilities on the other, to the investigators knowledge, no study has assessed the effect of a combined linguistic and metacognitive training approach in post-stroke aphasic patients on behavioral and imaging variables. This study postulates that rehabilitation combining linguistic and metacognitive training will lead to a significant improvement in language performance, correlated with changes in functional brain connectivity networks. Furthermore, it may enhance the generalization of effects to both verbal and non-verbal communication skills, directly impacting patients' quality of life.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
6 weeks phase A (Baseline)
Semantic rehabilitation
Semantic rehabilitation, consisting of validated lexico-phonological training exercises
7 weeks phase A (Baseline)
Semantic rehabilitation
Semantic rehabilitation, consisting of validated lexico-phonological training exercises
8 weeks phase A (Baseline)
Semantic rehabilitation
Semantic rehabilitation, consisting of validated lexico-phonological training exercises
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Semantic rehabilitation
Semantic rehabilitation, consisting of validated lexico-phonological training exercises
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Chronic phase (\> 3 months)
* Patient affiliated to a health insurance scheme
* Usual french language
* Severity score measures using the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination battery scale corresponding to the mild or moderate level (score greater than or equal to 2)
Exclusion Criteria
* Cognitive impairment pre-existing stroke (CQI code \> 3.4) (Law et al., 1995)
* Chronic alcohol or drug abuse
* Unstabilised psychiatric illness
* Uncorrected sensory deficits
* Diagnosed as having a progressive general pathology
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Toulouse
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital of Toulouse
Toulouse, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024-A01842-45
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
RC31/22/0503
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.