Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation + Language Therapy to Treat Subacute Aphasia
NCT ID: NCT06968663
Last Updated: 2025-05-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE2
63 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-08-01
2029-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
1. Can TMS combined with mCILT improve overall speech?
2. Can we identify specific behavioral and biological characteristics that would benefit most from the TMS and mCILT treatment?
Researchers will compare real TMS to sham (fake) TMS to see whether TMS can treat subacute aphasia.
Importantly, this trial will use electric field guided TMS to identify optimal and individualized stimulation intensity and site targeting.
Participants will:
* Complete a screening and medical intake to determine eligibility
* Undergo MRI scans
* Participate in 10 consecutive sessions (Monday-Friday) of TMS and mCILT treatment
* Complete follow-up assessments immediately and 4 months after treatment
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation + Language Therapy to Treat Mild Aphasia
NCT06842745
Targeted Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Language and Speech in Patients With Primary Progressive Aphasia
NCT06921265
TMS in Aphasia Recovery
NCT04777214
Language Processing and TMS
NCT05425615
Post-Stroke Aphasia TMS
NCT06974279
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Most studies of TMS as a therapy for aphasia have investigated treatment in the chronic phase after stroke (\>6 months post-stroke). Previous research has demonstrated that TMS improves language performance in persons with chronic aphasia and the benefit has been shown to be sustained. Several lines of evidence, however, suggest that TMS treatment in the subacute period may be more effective than interventions in the chronic stage.
One limitation of TMS has been variability in response; TMS has shown good within-subject reliability but more substantial variability between subjects. In recognition of these issues, "electrical field" (e-field) models have been developed to account for these individual differences in anatomy. We will the utilize e-field models in conjunction with an individually determined resting motor threshold to generate a personalized treatment regimen that is likely to ensure that all subjects receive the same TMS intensity relative to their individual motor threshold and greatly reduces the possibility of under- or over-dosing with respect to TMS intensity. We will employ continuous theta-burst stimulation, 600 brief electrical pulses delivered in 40 seconds, over the right front part of the brain (pars triangularis).
Participants who are enrolled can expect to undergo a battery of tests to define their language function as well as a research MRI scan that will be used to guide TMS therapy and to assess the size and location of the stroke and its impact on brain pathways. After baseline testing, subjects will undergo treatment using TMS (or sham) + mCILT for 10 sessions (Monday-Friday) over the course of 2 consecutives week. Follow-up assessment of language functioning will be assessed immediately and 4 months after treatment.
Participants will be compensated for their time and travel.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Real TMS
Some of our participants will be randomized to the real treatment arm where they will receive 10 sessions of real TMS paired with language therapy.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
TMS, is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, that uses magnetic pulses to stimulate specific areas of the brain. In this study we will utilize theta-burst stimulation which uses a higher frequency pulse of 50 Hz delivered for 40 seconds for a total of 600 pulses.
Modified Constraint Induced Language Therapy (mCILT)
Constraint-induced language therapy (CILT) is a treatment approach for aphasia that focuses on forcing the patient to use their impaired language skills, while restricting the use of compensatory strategies like gestures or writing. All participants will receive mCILT.
Fake TMS
Some of our participants will be randomized to the sham treatment arm where they will receive 10 sessions of fake TMS paired with language therapy.
Modified Constraint Induced Language Therapy (mCILT)
Constraint-induced language therapy (CILT) is a treatment approach for aphasia that focuses on forcing the patient to use their impaired language skills, while restricting the use of compensatory strategies like gestures or writing. All participants will receive mCILT.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
TMS, is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, that uses magnetic pulses to stimulate specific areas of the brain. In this study we will utilize theta-burst stimulation which uses a higher frequency pulse of 50 Hz delivered for 40 seconds for a total of 600 pulses.
Modified Constraint Induced Language Therapy (mCILT)
Constraint-induced language therapy (CILT) is a treatment approach for aphasia that focuses on forcing the patient to use their impaired language skills, while restricting the use of compensatory strategies like gestures or writing. All participants will receive mCILT.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The stroke must have occurred between 2 and 6 weeks prior to enrollment
* Must be able to understand the nature of the study, and give informed consent
* English proficiency
* Right-handed
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous head trauma with loss of consciousness for more than 5 minutes
* History of major psychiatric illness
* Dementia, or other neurological conditions
* Epilepsy, or seizure after the stroke event
* Pacemaker
* Diagnosis of tinnitus
* Pregnancy
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Pennsylvania
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
H. Branch Coslett, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pennsylvania
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
856766
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.