Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation + Language Therapy to Treat Subacute Aphasia

NCT ID: NCT06968663

Last Updated: 2025-05-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

63 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-08-01

Study Completion Date

2029-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) combined with modified Constraint Induced Language Therapy (mCILT) is an effective treatment for aphasia when delivered in the subacute stage after stroke.

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

1. Can TMS combined with mCILT improve overall speech?
2. Can we identify specific behavioral and biological characteristics that would benefit most from the TMS and mCILT treatment?

Researchers will compare real TMS to sham (fake) TMS to see whether TMS can treat subacute aphasia.

Importantly, this trial will use electric field guided TMS to identify optimal and individualized stimulation intensity and site targeting.

Participants will:

* Complete a screening and medical intake to determine eligibility
* Undergo MRI scans
* Participate in 10 consecutive sessions (Monday-Friday) of TMS and mCILT treatment
* Complete follow-up assessments immediately and 4 months after treatment

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aphasia is an acquired disorder of language that occurs in approximately 30% of individuals with stroke and impacts approximately 1 million Americans (see NINDS.NIH.gov). Current treatments for aphasia are only modestly beneficial, so there is a clear need for more efficacious therapy.

Most studies of TMS as a therapy for aphasia have investigated treatment in the chronic phase after stroke (\>6 months post-stroke). Previous research has demonstrated that TMS improves language performance in persons with chronic aphasia and the benefit has been shown to be sustained. Several lines of evidence, however, suggest that TMS treatment in the subacute period may be more effective than interventions in the chronic stage.

One limitation of TMS has been variability in response; TMS has shown good within-subject reliability but more substantial variability between subjects. In recognition of these issues, "electrical field" (e-field) models have been developed to account for these individual differences in anatomy. We will the utilize e-field models in conjunction with an individually determined resting motor threshold to generate a personalized treatment regimen that is likely to ensure that all subjects receive the same TMS intensity relative to their individual motor threshold and greatly reduces the possibility of under- or over-dosing with respect to TMS intensity. We will employ continuous theta-burst stimulation, 600 brief electrical pulses delivered in 40 seconds, over the right front part of the brain (pars triangularis).

Participants who are enrolled can expect to undergo a battery of tests to define their language function as well as a research MRI scan that will be used to guide TMS therapy and to assess the size and location of the stroke and its impact on brain pathways. After baseline testing, subjects will undergo treatment using TMS (or sham) + mCILT for 10 sessions (Monday-Friday) over the course of 2 consecutives week. Follow-up assessment of language functioning will be assessed immediately and 4 months after treatment.

Participants will be compensated for their time and travel.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Aphasia Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Real TMS

Some of our participants will be randomized to the real treatment arm where they will receive 10 sessions of real TMS paired with language therapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

TMS, is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, that uses magnetic pulses to stimulate specific areas of the brain. In this study we will utilize theta-burst stimulation which uses a higher frequency pulse of 50 Hz delivered for 40 seconds for a total of 600 pulses.

Modified Constraint Induced Language Therapy (mCILT)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Constraint-induced language therapy (CILT) is a treatment approach for aphasia that focuses on forcing the patient to use their impaired language skills, while restricting the use of compensatory strategies like gestures or writing. All participants will receive mCILT.

Fake TMS

Some of our participants will be randomized to the sham treatment arm where they will receive 10 sessions of fake TMS paired with language therapy.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Modified Constraint Induced Language Therapy (mCILT)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Constraint-induced language therapy (CILT) is a treatment approach for aphasia that focuses on forcing the patient to use their impaired language skills, while restricting the use of compensatory strategies like gestures or writing. All participants will receive mCILT.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)

TMS, is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, that uses magnetic pulses to stimulate specific areas of the brain. In this study we will utilize theta-burst stimulation which uses a higher frequency pulse of 50 Hz delivered for 40 seconds for a total of 600 pulses.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Modified Constraint Induced Language Therapy (mCILT)

Constraint-induced language therapy (CILT) is a treatment approach for aphasia that focuses on forcing the patient to use their impaired language skills, while restricting the use of compensatory strategies like gestures or writing. All participants will receive mCILT.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Left hemisphere stroke resulting in aphasia
* The stroke must have occurred between 2 and 6 weeks prior to enrollment
* Must be able to understand the nature of the study, and give informed consent
* English proficiency
* Right-handed

Exclusion Criteria

* History of serious and/or ongoing issues with substance abuse
* Previous head trauma with loss of consciousness for more than 5 minutes
* History of major psychiatric illness
* Dementia, or other neurological conditions
* Epilepsy, or seizure after the stroke event
* Pacemaker
* Diagnosis of tinnitus
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Pennsylvania

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

H. Branch Coslett, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pennsylvania

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Leslie Vnenchak, MA, CCC-SLP

Role: CONTACT

215-964-2502

Daniela Sacchetti, MS

Role: CONTACT

215-964-2502

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Leslie Vnenchak, MA, CCC-SLP

Role: primary

215-964-2502

Daniela Sacchetti, MS

Role: backup

215-964-2502

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

856766

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

tDCS to Treat Subacute Aphasia
NCT04048668 WITHDRAWN NA
Brain Stimulation and Aphasia Treatment
NCT01686373 COMPLETED PHASE2