Brain Stimulation and Aphasia Treatment

NCT ID: NCT01686373

Last Updated: 2019-08-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

74 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-04-30

Study Completion Date

2017-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the changes in language processing of patients with chronic, post-stroke aphasia following the application of brain stimulation. The brain stimulation the investigators administer is called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). It involves passing a weak electrical current through the brain between two electrodes in the form of damp sponges. One sponge will be placed over a specified area on the damaged left hemisphere, while the other sponge will be placed on the right scalp. Computer-controlled speech-language treatment will be administered during the application of tDCS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Stroke is the leading cause of adult disability in the United States. Approximately one-third of all strokes result in acute language impairment (aphasia), with approximately one-fifth suffering from chronic aphasia. Unfortunately, the prognosis for moderate to severe chronic aphasia remains grim, as current behavioral treatment approaches usually offer only limited-to-modest benefit. Recent advancements in understanding the relationship between low current electrical brain stimulation and cortical plasticity suggest that the effect of behavioral aphasia treatment could possibly be enhanced using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (A-tDCS). Indeed, we have shown how A-tDCS can significantly boost the effect of behavioral aphasia treatment. Based on these results as well as our other studies aimed at understanding how favorable brain plasticity correlates with positive treatment outcome in aphasia, we propose to conduct a Phase II clinical trial utilizing a futility design. Consistent with the goals of Program Announcement PAR-08-204 by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), we plan to "evaluate whether there is sufficient evidence of short term improvement in humans to justify a phase III trial."

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aphasia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Activa Dose II Real tDCS

Actual delivery of electrical stimulation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Activa Dose II Real tDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

20 minutes of 1 milliamp active tDCS per treatment day (15 total sessions)

Activa Dose II Sham tDCS

Sham delivery of electrical stimulation

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Activa Dose II Sham tDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

20 minutes of sham stimulation per treatment day (15 total sessions)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Activa Dose II Real tDCS

20 minutes of 1 milliamp active tDCS per treatment day (15 total sessions)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Activa Dose II Sham tDCS

20 minutes of sham stimulation per treatment day (15 total sessions)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients must be willing and able to give informed consent.
2. Patients must be willing and able to comply with study requirements.
3. Patients must be between 25- and 80-years of age.
4. Patients must be native English speakers.
5. Patients must be pre-morbidly right-handed.
6. Patients must have sustained a one-time ischemic stroke in the left-hemisphere.
7. Patients must be greater than 6-months post-stroke.
8. Patients must have an aphasia diagnosis as confirmed by the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised.
9. Patients must be MRI-compatible (e.g., no metal implants, not claustrophobic, etc.).
10. Patients must achieve at least 65% accuracy on naming task during screening -

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of brain surgery
2. Seizures during the previous 12 months
3. Sensitive scalp (per patient report)
4. Able to overtly name more than an average of 140 out of 175 items during the pre-treatment picture naming test (Philadelphia Naming Test) during Visits 2 or 3.
5. Unable to overtly name at least an average of 5 out of 80 items during the pre-treatment functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) sessions during Visits 2 or 3.
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medical University of South Carolina

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of South Carolina

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Julius Fridriksson

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Julius Fridriksson, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Director

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

University of South Carolina (USC)

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fridriksson J, Rorden C, Elm J, Sen S, George MS, Bonilha L. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation vs Sham Stimulation to Treat Aphasia After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Dec 1;75(12):1470-1476. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2287.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30128538 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://sph.sc.edu/comd/fridriks/

University of South Carolina Aphasia Laboratory

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U01DC011739

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

11560FA12

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

tDCS to Treat Subacute Aphasia
NCT04048668 WITHDRAWN NA