Effects of MTS-r on Speech Production in Non-fluent Aphasia Post-ischemic Stroke Patients
NCT ID: NCT02241213
Last Updated: 2014-09-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-08-31
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
OVERALL OBJECTIVE Determine the efficacy of repetitive low-frequency TMS on oral language recovery in post-ischemic stroke patients with non-fluent aphasia
ESPECIFIC OBJETIVES
* Estimate the effect of repetitiveTMS treatment on right Lowe Frontal Gyrus (GFI), in the evolution of the neuropsychological language test results in patients with non-fluent aphasia, compared to placebo.
* Describe the behavior of depression and anxiety levels in both treatment groups (active and placebo), through Zung anxiety and depression test, to establish their correlation with production testing language.
* Evaluate the effect of repetitiveTMS technique compared to placebo, on the overall functionality of the subject through Barthel scale.
* Describe the impact of language behavior on the quality of life of patients treated with placebo and active EMT, assessed by the EuroQol test.
METHODOLOGY A placebo double blind controlled and randomize trial, to evaluate the efficacy of low frequency EMT-r in language recovery in 100 patients with first ischemic stroke event among the first 4-8 months postinfarction and non-fluent aphasia. The patient will agree and will sign the informed consent, in order to application aphasia diagnosis Boston test, Edinburgh test, Barthel scale, Zung anxiety and depression test, and EuroQol scale, Neuropsi. Subsequently the subjects will be randomizate to any of two arms of the study. A week before the start of the stimulation sessions, the following tests will be applied to assess language production: Boston Test and Verbal Fluency (FAS). Each patient will have a daily session EMT-r low-frequency active or inactive coil with a biphasic stimulator pulses applied for ten days in two weeks on the triangular area - homologous to injury Lower Front Gyrus (LFG), (right brain hemisphere). Complete the treatment schedule of two weeks, the language production will be evaluate again, and also scales as Barthel an Rankin-m, Zung anxiety and depression and EuroQol. This monitoring will be achieved in five stages: after one week, one month, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months post-stimulation, with the intention of determining the duration and effectiveness effects in language production of the EMT-r.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of rTMS Based on Brain Activation During Language Performance in Stroke Patients With Non-fluent Aphasia
NCT02556385
rTMS and Multi-Modality Aphasia Therapy for Post-Stroke Aphasia
NCT04901156
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Multi-modality Aphasia Therapy for Post-stroke Non-fluent Aphasia
NCT04102228
Effects of rTMS Based on Neural Activation in Language Performance in Stroke Patients With Non-fluent Aphasia
NCT02591719
TMS in Aphasia Recovery
NCT04777214
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Stroke is a major public health problem, one-third of patients do not survive the first year after the vascular event, cause of severe disability and also is the third leading cause of death worldwide. Two-thirds of the survivors have neurologic deficits including aphasia (19%) generating functional disability, compromise on their daily living activities, and impact on the quality of life (93% of patients with aphasia after stroke compared with 50% of those survive without aphasia). Aphasia is an additional risk factor for depression (prevalence 5-63%), and also interfering with the functional and cognitive recovery, increasing the risk of mortality.
Generally the treatment of aphasia is based on speech therapy and drug therapy oriented comorbidities such as depression or anxiety. However, it has studied different interventions in an effort to improve the speech recovery of aphasia, as Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), which facilitates recovery by stimulating contralesional and lesional regions. Most studies have been based on the transcallosal disinhibition theory, which consist on blocking homotopic regions through low frequency stimulation in the right posterior GFI (triangular portion) to produce a GFI disinhibition from right to left and facilitate neuroplasticity brain process.
EMT technique is based on the principle of electromagnetic induction, proposed by Michael Faraday (1831), in which posits that magnetic field depends on the stimulation time, generating an electric field that eventually causes neuronal excitability.The strength of the electric current produced in the coil between 5-10 Ka (Kiloamperes), while the strength of the induced magnetic field is about 1 to 2 Tesla, and the cortical area to stimulated is about 3 cm² and 2 cm depth. The magnetic field generated may have sufficient magnitude and density to depolarize cortical neurons tract, directly through axonal cone or indirectly through interneurons. When TMS pulses are applied repeatedly, which is known as repetitive TMS (r-TMS) produce modulation of the cortical excitability, increasing or decreasing, depending on the stimulation parameters. Those effects may persist beyond the train stimulation; defined as repetitive series of regular pulses.
Fundamental mechanisms of EMT, are not yet fully understood, because due inter-session and inter-subject variability have been observed in the modulation of induced excitability. The EMT-r may also induce changes in hormonal and neurotransmitter systems, such as, serotonin, dopamine, NMDA receptors, taurine, aspartate, serine axis and can regulate the expression of some genes; cfos, c-jung, which are important for synaptic plasticity. It has been studied several possible mechanisms involved in the functional regulation exerted by the EMT-r, such as synaptic plasticity, which is the most explored one, changes in excitability of neuronal networks, activation of feedback loops and metaplasticity, understood plasticity as synaptic plasticity. However, although but not yet, been established whether the source of the clinical benefit of any scheme of stimulation is a direct or indirect result of the modulation of the excitability, is believed to be associated with neuromodulators release and growth factors such as neurotrophic factor derived from the brain, which play an important role in the mechanism of EMT.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation TMS- r
Application of single stimulation pulses and regularly repeated ones, the frequency may be divided into high frequency EMT (\> 1 Hz), low frequency (\<1 Hz) This classification is based on physiological effects (stimulation or inhibition neuronal respectively). In this particular case, we will use low frequency \<1 Hz with repetitive pulses.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS-r)
10 sessions, each session of EMT-r will be low frequency (1 Hz for 20 minutes and a total of 1200 pulses) using a biphasic pulse stimulator, with active coil (coil-shaped focal or inactive coil "placebo" for 2 weeks from Monday to Friday, target: triangular portion - homologous to injury Inferior front Gyrus (GFI).
Placebo Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Placebo coil that will simulate the sound of the pulses.
Placebo Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
10 sesions of Non- active coil, that will simulate the sound of the TMS, holding the coil on the scalp at an angle of 45 degrees in the selected area
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS-r)
10 sessions, each session of EMT-r will be low frequency (1 Hz for 20 minutes and a total of 1200 pulses) using a biphasic pulse stimulator, with active coil (coil-shaped focal or inactive coil "placebo" for 2 weeks from Monday to Friday, target: triangular portion - homologous to injury Inferior front Gyrus (GFI).
Placebo Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
10 sesions of Non- active coil, that will simulate the sound of the TMS, holding the coil on the scalp at an angle of 45 degrees in the selected area
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* School-level equal to or more than 5 years approved.
* Right hand dominance, determined through the Edinburgh Inventory (score above 40) .
* Ischemic stroke, at the territory of the left middle cerebral artery (MCA - Left).
* Aphasia diagnosis determined by the test for aphasia Boston.
* Patients who have previously received speech therapy
* Patients who gave their written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases such dementia and Parkinson's disease.
* Pre- Epilepsy diagnosis
* Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus Type I or II
* Diagnosis of liver disease or renal
* Diagnosis of Diseases-terminal to prevent tracking
* Diagnosis of psychiatric illnesses such as major depressive disorder (MDD) or other.
* Global cognitive impairment or previous diagnosis of dementia
* Visual or auditory deficit
* Patients with metal implants, cardiac pacemakers or drug infusion pumps.
50 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Instituto Colombiano para el Desarrollo de la Ciencia y la Tecnología (COLCIENCIAS)
OTHER_GOV
Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Federico A Silva, MD,MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fundacion Cardiovascular de Colombia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fundacion Cardiovascular de Colombia
Bucaramanga, Santander Department, Colombia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
656656933492
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
fcv-Aphasia
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.