Late LTP-like Plasticity Effects of tDCS in Chronic Stroke Patients

NCT ID: NCT02399540

Last Updated: 2016-08-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

84 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-03-31

Study Completion Date

2016-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rationale: About 80% of stroke patients suffer motor impairments, but current therapies have limited effects on motor recovery. Therefore, investigating new potential therapeutic approaches is crucial. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a form of non-invasive electrical stimulation where a weak current is applied through electrodes over the scalp. This stimulation is known to (1) induce changes in neuronal excitability -which can last up to one day with late LTP-like plasticity protocols- in a polarity and site-specific manner, and (2) facilitate motor learning and stroke recovery. However, it is unknown how the motor cortex excitability changes that follow tDCS relate to the increase in motor learning and recovery potential. The currently upheld hypothesis is that motor learning needs to be synchronized in time with electrical stimulation (paired stimulation), but recent results from our lab suggest that tDCS also increases skill learning after stimulation has ended (unpaired stimulation). If this is true, tDCS has a much larger therapeutic window and is a more valuable clinical tool than currently believed. Therefore, the investigators want to investigate how late LTP-like plasticity tDCS affects the increase in skill learning normally seen with tDCS when applied 24 hours before training. The outcome of this study can provide important guidelines on effective motor therapy during stroke rehabilitation.

Objective: Identify the effect of late LTP-like plasticity tDCS in chronic stroke patients on skill learning 24 hours later.

Study design: Double-blinded, randomized between-subjects trials. Study population: Chronic stroke patients. Main study parameters/endpoints: The main objective of the study is to determine the effect of late LTP-like plasticity tDCS on skill learning 24 hours later. As a motor learning paradigm, the investigators will use a circuit tracking task which chronic stroke patients perform better if tDCS is applied concurrently. During this task, patients have to trace a cursor over a circuit as fast and accurately as possible by moving a computer mouse. Skill will be quantified by calculating a combined speed/ accuracy score and skill improvement compared to baseline (LI; the learning index) will be compared between the sham, conventional unpaired tDCS, conventional paired tDCS groups and the late LTP-like plasticity tDCS groups.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Hemiparesis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sham

Day 1: sham stimulation Day 2: sham stimulation

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham

Intervention Type DEVICE

Bihemispheric 1mA Sham protocol: sham - pause - sham

Conventional Paired tDCS

Day 1: sham stimulation Day 2: conventional tDCS

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Paired tDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Bihemispheric 1mA Sham protocol: sham - pause - sham Conventional Paired tDCS protocol: 20 minutes tDCS - pause - sham

Conventional Unpaired tDCS

Day 1: conventional tDCS Day 2: sham stimulation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Unpaired tDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Bihemispheric 1mA Sham protocol: sham - pause - sham Conventional Unpaired tDCS protocol: 20 minutes tDCS - pause - sham

Late LTP-like Plasticity tDCS

Day 1: late LTP-like Plasticity tDCS Day 2: sham stimulation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Late LTP-like Plasticity tDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Bihemispheric 1mA Sham protocol: sham - pause - sham Late LTP-like Plasticity tDCS protocol: 10 minutes tDCS - 25 minutes pause - 10 minutes tDCS

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sham

Bihemispheric 1mA Sham protocol: sham - pause - sham

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional Paired tDCS

Bihemispheric 1mA Sham protocol: sham - pause - sham Conventional Paired tDCS protocol: 20 minutes tDCS - pause - sham

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional Unpaired tDCS

Bihemispheric 1mA Sham protocol: sham - pause - sham Conventional Unpaired tDCS protocol: 20 minutes tDCS - pause - sham

Intervention Type DEVICE

Late LTP-like Plasticity tDCS

Bihemispheric 1mA Sham protocol: sham - pause - sham Late LTP-like Plasticity tDCS protocol: 10 minutes tDCS - 25 minutes pause - 10 minutes tDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Chronic (\> 6 months) stroke patient
* Aged 18-79 years
* Motor deficit in the upper limb due to the stroke

Exclusion Criteria

* Absence of recordable MEPs from the ADM after TMS
* Absence of voluntary movement (Fugl-Meyer \< III)
* Head injury or the presence of intracranial metal or intracranial lesions
* History of cranial irradiation
* History of epilepsy
* Presence of a pacemaker
* Taking anticonvulsant or neuroleptic medication
* Substance abuse
* Inability to understand instructions
* History of psychiatric disorders
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

79 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Erasmus Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rick van der Vliet

MSc

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rijndam

Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lefebvre S, Laloux P, Peeters A, Desfontaines P, Jamart J, Vandermeeren Y. Dual-tDCS Enhances Online Motor Skill Learning and Long-Term Retention in Chronic Stroke Patients. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jan 9;6:343. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00343. eCollection 2012.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23316151 (View on PubMed)

Elsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M, Mehrholz J. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 11;11(11):CD009645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009645.pub4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33175411 (View on PubMed)

van der Vliet R, Ribbers GM, Vandermeeren Y, Frens MA, Selles RW. BDNF Val66Met but not transcranial direct current stimulation affects motor learning after stroke. Brain Stimul. 2017 Sep-Oct;10(5):882-892. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28751226 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MEC-2014-203

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

tDCS and Physical Therapy in Stroke
NCT00542256 COMPLETED NA