Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT ID: NCT04938076
Last Updated: 2024-07-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
172 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-04-16
2024-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of tDCS on Motor Learning and Neural Network in Stroke Patients
NCT04903457
Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Contralesional Hemisphere on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients
NCT03635008
Late LTP-like Plasticity Effects of tDCS in Subacute Stroke Patients
NCT02393651
Effect of tDCS on Upper Extremity After Strokes
NCT02987361
Multicenter Study on the Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Post-stroke Motor Recovery
NCT04166968
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In participants with cerebral infarction, non-invasive brain stimulation (tDCS) such as transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) has been reported to be effective in improving motor performance and safe. However, few studies have been done in participants with acute cerebral infarction, and previous studies in participants with acute cerebral infarction have not verified the effect in mild cerebral infarction, and previous studies in acute cerebral infarction mainly stimulate lesions to anode. So in this study, the investigators want to see the effect of stimulating tDCS to both hemispheres in acute cerebral infarction against this backdrop.
Study Objective: To see if tDCS is effective in improving motor paralysis in participants with acute cerebral infarction.
Expected effectiveness: stability of tDCS has already been demonstrated in many studies. Since tDCS itself is a non-invasive treatment, if the efficacy of the tDCS prove to be effective in patients with acute cerebral infarction, it can be widely implemented without significant risk to many patients.
Intervention : In this randomized controlled trial, the investigators perform tDCS in patients with acute ischemic stroke within 48 hours after stroke onset with sham control.
Outcome : the investigators measure motor weakness and function at early phase as well as at 3 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
tDCS group
tDCS stimulation
* affected side :
1. primary motor cortex (M1 cortex by using the C3 or C4 position of the 10-20 EEG system)
2. 2mA anode (+) for 30 minutes total 10 times for 7 days (ex) twice a day for 5 days)
* contralateral unaffected side
1. primary motor cortex (M1 cortex by using the C3 or C4 position of the 10-20 EEG system)
2. 2mA cathode (-) for 30 minutes total 10 times for 7 days (ex) twice a day for 5 days)
Transcranial direct current stimulation
Transcranial direct current stimulation on motor cortex
Sham group
. Sham stimulation
1\) the current ramps up to 2mA and slowly decreased over 30 s to ensure the typical initial tingling sensation
sham control
sham control
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transcranial direct current stimulation
Transcranial direct current stimulation on motor cortex
sham control
sham control
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 18-85 of age
* corticospinal tract involvement stroke (primary motor cortex, corona radiata, internal capsule, midbrain crus cerebri, basis pontis, anterior medulla)
Exclusion Criteria
* Intravenous r-tPA thrombolysis or EVT (endovascular thrombectomy)
* history of epilepsy
* advanced systemic disease or coexisting neurological/psychiatric disease
* severe contact dermatitis or skin lesions interfering with the applying the electrode of tDCS
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Catholic University of Korea
OTHER
Incheon St.Mary's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Taewon Kim
Assistant Professor, MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Taewon Kim, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Incheon St.Mary's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital
Incheon, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
OC19DESI0124
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.