tDCS for Neurological Disability Among Subacute Stroke Survivors to Improve Multiple Domains in Quality of Life
NCT ID: NCT06110169
Last Updated: 2023-11-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
64 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-11-30
2024-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Type of study: Multiple Randomized Controlled trials (RCTs) Methods: Multiple RCTs will be conducted for subacute stroke survivors (\>7 days to 3 months post stroke) aged 40-75 years with National Institutes of Health stroke scale score of \>10 and Mini-Mental State Examination Score between18-23 on admission. Anticipated 64 Participants will take part in a prospective, randomized, participant- and assessor-blinded, sham-controlled trial after voluntary consent. The participants will be randomly assigned at a ratio of 1:1 to receive either: 16 patient-tailored sessions of anodal tDCS or sham tDCS in addition to conventional rehabilitation. Battery driven tDCS will be applied at 2 mA intensity to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and primary motor cortex for 20 minutes. The primary endpoints of study will be differences in 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) scores post intervention at 4 weeks. The secondary outcomes will include Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale, Montreal cognitive assessment, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Fugl-Meyer Assessment and Barthel Index.
Results: SPSS software version 22 will be used to analyze the normal distribution of data and based on data normality, within group and between group actual differences will be calculated for all outcome measures to examine the main effects of the intervention. The level of significance will be set at 0.05
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Brain Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Recovery After Stroke
NCT00085657
Brain Stimulation Enhance Post-stroke Walking Survivors and Healthy Adults
NCT06191549
Multicenter Study on the Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Post-stroke Motor Recovery
NCT04166968
Personalized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Stroke Recovery
NCT06286800
Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) to Enhance the Benefit of Movement Training in Stoke Patients
NCT00783913
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Inter-hemispheric balance is disrupted after stroke, interfering with the recovery process. Motor functions depend on the modulation of inter-hemispheric inhibition between cortical areas via transcallosal projections and descending projections. Unilateral hemispheric damage reduces activity in the affected hemisphere while activity in the unaffected hemisphere increases, becoming more dominant. Hence recovery may relate to rebalancing of inter-hemispheric inhibition. The safe, portable and noninvasive brain stimulation method known as tDCS can modify the excitability of certain brain regions by changing the polarity of the neuronal membrane potentials using sponge electrodes. Transcranial brain stimulation (TBS), when used in conjunction with neurorehabilitation in the early subacute phase after IS (within the first 4 weeks after stroke onset), may promote quicker and better recovery by enhancing underlying neuroplastic processes, which may be more susceptible at this time. tDCS alters neuronal activity and induces neuroplastic changes in the brain to improve motor and executive performance. Multiple sessions of tDCS may be utilized to enhance rehabilitative outcomes and lessen symptom load across a variety of Stroke. The targeted effects of tDCS on physical and functional aspects may contribute to an improvement in QoL-related areas. In Saudi Arabia, there is a significant gap between evidence-based stroke medication and care. Stroke has been deemed a high priority illness by the Ministry of Health that requires better management Therefore, the main objective of the current proposal is to close the gaps in the literature by researching the effects of tailored tDCS on lifestyle variables, as well as on physical, behavioral, and cognitive functions in stroke survivors, and by figuring out the factors that mediate the effects of various domains on QoL.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A (anodal tDCS)
Participants will receive 20 minutes of anodal tDCS
Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (Anodal tDCS)
Battery driven tDCS will be applied at 2 mA intensity to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and primary motor cortex for 20 minutes.
Group B (sham tDCS)
Participants will receive 20 minutes of sham anodal tDCS
Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
Participants will receive 20 minutes of sham anodal tDCS
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (Anodal tDCS)
Battery driven tDCS will be applied at 2 mA intensity to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and primary motor cortex for 20 minutes.
Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
Participants will receive 20 minutes of sham anodal tDCS
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Acute first-ever unilateral infarction which is confirmed by MRI.
* Subacute stroke (Ischemic type) (\>7 days to 3 months post stroke)
* Modified Ashworth scale \< 2 in both upper and lower extremity
* Mini-Mental State Examination Score between18-23 on admission
* National Institutes of Health stroke scale score of \>10 on admission
* Clear consciousness able to sign the informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Epilepsy
* Diagnosed as hemorrhagic stroke
* Any neurological diseases other than stroke
* Any musculoskeletal injury affecting motor functions
* Any neuropsychiatric diseases
* Any medically unstable condition due to Cardiovascular or respiratory illness.
* Severe medical diseases or other systemic illness like malignancy, end stage kidney, heart or liver failure
* Pregnancy, presence of metallic implants, pacemaker
* Hypersensitive patients, Non-Cooperative or unwilling Individuals
40 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Karthick Balasubramanian
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Karthick Balasubramanian
Lecturer, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jazan University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mohammed Mansour Alshehri, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistant professor, Department of Physical Therapy, Jazan University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital, Jazan University
Jizan, , Saudi Arabia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Alqahtani BA, Alenazi AM, Hoover JC, Alshehri MM, Alghamdi MS, Osailan AM, Khunti K. Incidence of stroke among Saudi population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2020 Nov;41(11):3099-3104. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04520-4. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, van der Wees PJ, Hendriks E, Rietberg M, Kwakkel G. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 4;9(2):e87987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087987. eCollection 2014.
Winters C, van Wegen EE, Daffertshofer A, Kwakkel G. Generalizability of the Proportional Recovery Model for the Upper Extremity After an Ischemic Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Aug;29(7):614-22. doi: 10.1177/1545968314562115. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
Cassidy JM, Cramer SC. Spontaneous and Therapeutic-Induced Mechanisms of Functional Recovery After Stroke. Transl Stroke Res. 2017 Feb;8(1):33-46. doi: 10.1007/s12975-016-0467-5. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
Divya M, Narkeesh A. Therapeutic Effect of Multi-Channel Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (M-tDCS) on Recovery of Cognitive Domains, Motor Functions of Paretic Hand and Gait in Subacute Stroke Survivors-A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol. Neurosci Insights. 2022 Mar 30;17:26331055221087741. doi: 10.1177/26331055221087741. eCollection 2022.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
tDCS for stroke survivors
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.