Advent™ Cervical Disc Versus ACDF for Treatment of One Level Degenerative Disc Disease (IDE Study)
NCT ID: NCT00637312
Last Updated: 2014-03-27
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
108 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-03-31
2013-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of DISCOVER™ Artificial Cervical Disc and ACDF for Treatment of Cervical DDD (IDE Study)
NCT00432159
Study to Investigate the Performance of Cervical Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
NCT00700739
Evaluating The Safety and Effectiveness of The NeoDisc™ Versus ACDF in Subjects With Single-Level Cervical Disc Disease
NCT00478088
M6-C Artificial Cervical Disc Two-Level IDE Pivotal Study
NCT04982835
Outcome Study of Patients Treated With Translational Cervical Plate Used to Treat Degenerative Disc Disease
NCT00443547
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Advent™ Cervical Disc
Cervical artificial disc replacement: Advent™ Cervical Disc
Cervical Artificial Disc (Advent™ Cervical Disc)
Advent™ Cervical Disc
Standard care - Control
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with Hallmark™ Anterior Cervical Plate System
Hallmark™ Anterior Cervical Plate System
Hallmark™ Anterior Cervical Plate System with AlloQuent Structural Allograft (corticocancellous allograft bone)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cervical Artificial Disc (Advent™ Cervical Disc)
Advent™ Cervical Disc
Hallmark™ Anterior Cervical Plate System
Hallmark™ Anterior Cervical Plate System with AlloQuent Structural Allograft (corticocancellous allograft bone)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Unresponsive to conservative care over a period of at least 6 weeks
* Neck Disability Index score ≥ 15/50 (30%)
* Willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol including follow-up requirements and to sign a study specific informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Active local (at the proposed surgical site) or systemic infection
* Prior anterior neck surgery at any level.
* Prior posterior cervical spine surgery at the index level except posterior decompressive surgery where the posterior elements are preserved.
* Currently undergoing treatment for disease of the thoracic or lumbar spine.
* Axial neck pain as the primary diagnosis, without evidence of neural compression
* Significant cervical anatomical deformity
* Any anatomical consideration which in the investigators opinion would make the anterior cervical approach excessively risky or impossible
* Severe obesity defined as a Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 40
* Instability on AP, lateral neutral or flex/ext images: ≥2mm translation relative to the adjacent segment, and/or ≥ 11 degrees relative to adjacent segments
* Central disc height ≤ 2mm
* Advanced spondylosis (i.e. facet joints degeneration, anterior or posterior bridging of the interspace or lack of motion on the pre-operative flexion/extension x-rays)
* Severe cervical myelopathy as indicated by: Signs and/or symptoms \> 6months duration, Nurick's Classification grades IV or V, and/or Myelomalacia as evidence on a MRI
* Metabolic bone disease such as osteoporosis to a degree that spinal instrumentation is contra-indicated (Males over 55 years of age, females over 50 years of age and/or subjects that in the investigators opinion are medical indicative of osteoporosis (e.g. early menopause, steroid use, etc.) are required to have a DEXA scan; If the DEXA scan is ≤ -2.5t in the spine, the patient must be excluded)
* Allergy to any component of the device (titanium, polycarbonated polyurethane, polyethylene terephthalate, or ethylene oxide residuals)
* Chronic steroid or other medication use that may interfere with bony/soft tissue healing
* History of endocrine or metabolic disorders (e.g. Paget's disease) known to effect bone and mineral metabolism
* Autoimmune diseases e.g., ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, etc.
* Insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
* Active malignancy
* Currently pregnant or considering becoming pregnant during the follow-up period
* Advanced emphysema, Alzheimer's disease or other medical conditions that would interfere with patient self-assessment of function, pain or quality of life
* Medical condition (e.g. unstable cardiac disease, end-stage cancer) that may result in patient death prior to study completion
* Chemical dependency (e.g. alcohol or narcotic addiction) problem that may interfere with study requirements
* Mental incompetence as determined by the Investigator which may effect participation in the study
* Incarcerated
* Involved in any current or pending litigation relating to a spinal condition
* Concurrently participating in any other investigational study
* Anatomy (e.g. endplate dimensions) at the index level not consistent with the dimensions of the implants available (e.g. based on pre-operative radiographic evaluations and templates in the surgical technique manual).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Orthofix Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Scott L Blumenthal, M.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Texas Back Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California Davis
Sacramento, California, United States
Boulder Neurosurgical Associates
Boulder, Colorado, United States
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, United States
Spine Institute of Louisiana
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Brain and Spine Specialist
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Cooper University Neurological Institute
Camden, New Jersey, United States
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, United States
Triangle Orthopaedics Associates, P.A.
Durham, North Carolina, United States
University of Pennsylvania, Department of Neurosurgery
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
East Tennessee Brain and Spine Center
Johnson City, Tennessee, United States
Texas Back Institute
Plano, Texas, United States
The San Antonio Orthopaedic Group
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CP-01003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.