ACDF Comparison Trial

NCT ID: NCT03187171

Last Updated: 2019-05-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-12-01

Study Completion Date

2019-04-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This research protocol seeks to compare radiological and clinical outcomes of cervical spine disease patients following standard-of-care anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using allograft fusion versus Cohere porous polyetheretherketone (PEEK) fusion device.

This clinical study presents little to no additional risk to study subjects beyond those associated with standard-of-care ACDF surgery. Adults age 18 and over who are undergoing an ACDF procedure will be enrolled in the study. The study consists of a completing a series of questionnaires and obtaining radiographs. The primary endpoint of the study will be the rate of successful spinal fusion for each group. For evaluation of the primary endpoint and additional assessments, descriptive statistics including mean, standard deviation, minimum, median, and maximum for continuous variables and frequency distribution for categorical variables will be provided, as well as tabular listings. All complications will be itemized including incidence, duration, and relationship to the device used and/or procedures performed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective randomized comparative outcomes study, in which all subjects who fit the inclusion and exclusion criteria and who agreed to be part of the study will be randomized to either Allograft or Cohere polyetheretherketone (PEEK) fusion group and will be followed for approximately 12 months following surgery according to the standard-of-care.

Pain and function will be assessed using neck disability index (NDI), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). A trained study team member will record a standardized neurologic examination, including motor, sensory, and reflexes. Neurologic success is defined as maintenance or improvement of all 3 neurologic parameters (motor, sensory, and reflexes). The clinical results will also be assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system for cervical myelopathy.

Flexion and extension radiographs will be obtained pre-operatively, at 6-months and 12-months after surgery. A CT scan will be obtained at 6 months, if fusion has occurred no CT is needed at 12 months, if fusion did not occur another computerized tomography (CT) scan will obtained at 12 months. From previous literature, successful fusion is defined as ≤2° of angular motion on lateral flexion and extension radiographs, the presence of bridging trabecular bone between the vertebrae being fused, and the absence of any radiolucent zones spanning more than 50% of the allograft surface. Two independent blinded radiologists will assess the radiographs. In the event of disagreement about fusion healing, a third independent reading will be obtained from a third radiologist.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Spine Disc Disease Surgery Fusion of Spine Degenerative Disc Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a prospective randomized comparative outcomes study, in which all subjects who fit the inclusion and exclusion criteria and who agreed to be part of the study will be randomized to either Allograft or Cohere PEEK fusion group and will be followed for approximately 12 months following surgery according to the standard-of-care.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Allograft Fusion Group

The anterior approach to the cervical spine for discectomy and fusion by the insertion of an autologous iliac crest tricortical bone graft.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Allograft Fusion

Intervention Type OTHER

ACDF is a surgical technique used to treat a variety of cervical spine disorders, such as nerve root or spinal cord compression, cervical spondylosis, and cervical spinal stenosis. The anterior approach to the cervical spine for discectomy and fusion by the insertion of an autologous iliac crest tricortical bone graft was first described by Robinson and Smith in 1955. In 1958, Cloward described a wide anterior cylindrical discectomy performed with a special reamer combined with anterior fusion by the insertion of autologous iliac bone graft of the same shape. At Duke University Health Systems, both allografts and Cohere porous PEEK fusion device are used for ACDF.

Cohere PEEK Fusion Group

The anterior approach to the cervical spine for discectomy and fusion by the insertion of a Cohere porous PEEK fusion device.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cohere PEEK Fusion Group

Intervention Type DEVICE

Bagby et al. developed the first interbody fusion cage. Cages of different shapes and materials are used to perform ACDF which, in some cases, could be associated with plate fixation. At Duke University Health Systems, both allografts and Cohere porous PEEK fusion device are used for ACDF.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Allograft Fusion

ACDF is a surgical technique used to treat a variety of cervical spine disorders, such as nerve root or spinal cord compression, cervical spondylosis, and cervical spinal stenosis. The anterior approach to the cervical spine for discectomy and fusion by the insertion of an autologous iliac crest tricortical bone graft was first described by Robinson and Smith in 1955. In 1958, Cloward described a wide anterior cylindrical discectomy performed with a special reamer combined with anterior fusion by the insertion of autologous iliac bone graft of the same shape. At Duke University Health Systems, both allografts and Cohere porous PEEK fusion device are used for ACDF.

Intervention Type OTHER

Cohere PEEK Fusion Group

Bagby et al. developed the first interbody fusion cage. Cages of different shapes and materials are used to perform ACDF which, in some cases, could be associated with plate fixation. At Duke University Health Systems, both allografts and Cohere porous PEEK fusion device are used for ACDF.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Fusion Device PEEK Cage

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. 18 or more years of age
2. Able to provide informed consent
3. Has documented diagnosis of cervical spine radiculopathy and/or myelopathy
4. Is undergoing standard-of-care ACDF

Exclusion Criteria

1. Prior cervical spine surgery
2. Single-level ACDF
3. Has a systemic infection or cervical spine infection
4. Has a medical condition that may interfere with bone and soft tissue healing
5. Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may preclude accurate data collection or evaluation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Duke University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Haglund, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke University

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00083342

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fusion Status After ACDF
NCT05986006 UNKNOWN NA
Allogeinic Bone Paste
NCT04605120 UNKNOWN NA