Prospective Comparative Analysis of ACDF vs Fusion Interbody Cages With nanoLOCK Osseointegrative Technology

NCT ID: NCT05762055

Last Updated: 2025-04-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-05

Study Completion Date

2026-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study team will plan a prospective, randomized control trial using our institution's spine clinical outcomes registry. Eligible patients undergoing ACDF (see inclusion criteria listed below) will be randomized to an Intervention or Control Group, which will differ according to the interbody cage used during the procedure. In the Intervention Group (100 patients), Medtronic Titan Endoskeleton TCS zero-profile, stand-alone interbody cages with nanoLOCK osseointegrative technology will be implanted at each treated level. In the Control Group (100 patients), patients will receive an alternative interbody cage system that does not employ nanoLOCK ossteointegrative technology. Interbody cages used in the Control Group (along with the decision to apply anterior plate fixation) will be determined according to surgeon preference. There will be no blinding to the type of implant used. Standard demographic and procedural variables will be collected for all patients (including history of diabetes, tobacco, use, prior use of oral corticosteroids, number of levels fused, and presence of bicortical screw placement). Clinical and radiographic outcomes in the Intervention and Control Groups will be directly compared.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aim 1: Examine the effect of nanoLOCK technology on rates of postoperative dysphagia after ACDF.

Aim 2: Evaluate the effect of nanoLOCK technology on radiographic fusion.

Aim 3: Evaluate how nanoLOCK technology influences the development of radiographic adjacent segment disease.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Radiculopathy Cervical Myelopathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention Group

Medtronic Titan Endoskeleton TCS zero-profile, stand-alone interbody cages with nanoLOCK osseointegrative technology will be implanted for participants in this group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Titan nanoLOCK interbody cage

Intervention Type DEVICE

Medtronic Titan Endoskeleton TCS zero-profile, stand-alone interbody cages with nanoLOCK osseointegrative technology

Control Group

Participants in this arm will receive an alternative interbody cage system that does not employ nanoLOCK ossteointegrative technology.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ACDF interbody cage

Intervention Type DEVICE

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an alternative interbody cage system that does not employ nanoLOCK ossteointegrative technology

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Titan nanoLOCK interbody cage

Medtronic Titan Endoskeleton TCS zero-profile, stand-alone interbody cages with nanoLOCK osseointegrative technology

Intervention Type DEVICE

ACDF interbody cage

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an alternative interbody cage system that does not employ nanoLOCK ossteointegrative technology

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Titan nanoLOCK®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects 18 years of age or older
* Subjects undergoing ACDF surgery for degenerative pathology (one, two or three levels)
* Subjects with no prior history of cervical spine surgery
* Subjects with complete/usable data

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects under the age of 18
* Subjects not undergoing ACDF surgery
* Subjects with prior cervical spine surgery
* Subjects with cervical neoplastic or infectious disease pathology
* Subjects with cervical trauma pathology
* ACDF performed at C2-3
* Subjects with incomplete/unusable data
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Salah Aoun

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Salah Aoun, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UT Southwestern Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STU-2022-1092

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fusion Status After ACDF
NCT05986006 UNKNOWN NA
Posterior Cervical Fixation Study
NCT04770571 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Adaptix RCT Evaluating Adaptix™ Versus PEEK Cages
NCT05182489 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Titanium vs. PEEK Fusion Devices in 1 Level TLIF
NCT05691062 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE4
Lumbar Fusion With Porous Versus Non-Porous Cages
NCT05583864 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA