Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
PHASE4
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-09-01
2028-01-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Outcome and Fusion Rate of 3D Printed Interbody Fusion Cages and Titanium Coated PEEK Cages
NCT05237908
Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Patients With DDD Following TLIF With 3-D Printed Titanium Cage
NCT03018392
Lumbar Fusion With Porous Versus Non-Porous Cages
NCT05583864
A Comparison of Stryker's Tritanium Posterior Lumbar Cage and PEEK Implant
NCT03817606
PEEK and Allograft Spacers Evaluation in Spinal Fusion Surgeries
NCT01406405
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PEEK
Medtronic Capstone
PEEK Fusion Device
PEEK fusion device will be utilized for one-level lumbar fusion.
Titanium
Medtronic Adaptix
Titanium Fusion Device
Titanium fusion device will be utilized for one-level lumbar fusion.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Titanium Fusion Device
Titanium fusion device will be utilized for one-level lumbar fusion.
PEEK Fusion Device
PEEK fusion device will be utilized for one-level lumbar fusion.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients between 18-70 years of age at the time of surgery.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients undergoing more than 1 level of surgery.
3. Patients who have had prior lumbar fusion.
4. Patients requiring surgery for the management of infection, tumor, or trauma.
5. Patients who are pregnant.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Twin Cities Spine Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bayard Carlson
Staff Surgeon
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Twin Cities Spine Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rickert M, Fleege C, Tarhan T, Schreiner S, Makowski MR, Rauschmann M, Arabmotlagh M. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone oblique cages with and without a titanium coating: a randomised clinical pilot study. Bone Joint J. 2017 Oct;99-B(10):1366-1372. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B10.BJJ-2016-1292.R2.
Hasegawa T, Ushirozako H, Shigeto E, Ohba T, Oba H, Mukaiyama K, Shimizu S, Yamato Y, Ide K, Shibata Y, Ojima T, Takahashi J, Haro H, Matsuyama Y. The Titanium-coated PEEK Cage Maintains Better Bone Fusion With the Endplate Than the PEEK Cage 6 Months After PLIF Surgery: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Aug 1;45(15):E892-E902. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003464.
Villavicencio AT, Nelson EL, Rajpal S, Beasley K, Burneikiene S. Prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial comparing PEEK and allograft spacers in patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgeries. Spine J. 2022 Jan;22(1):84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
Seaman S, Kerezoudis P, Bydon M, Torner JC, Hitchon PW. Titanium vs. polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody fusion: Meta-analysis and review of the literature. J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Oct;44:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.062. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
Cuzzocrea F, Ivone A, Jannelli E, Fioruzzi A, Ferranti E, Vanelli R, Benazzo F. PEEK versus metal cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiological comparative study. Musculoskelet Surg. 2019 Dec;103(3):237-241. doi: 10.1007/s12306-018-0580-6. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
Nemoto O, Asazuma T, Yato Y, Imabayashi H, Yasuoka H, Fujikawa A. Comparison of fusion rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cages or titanium cages with transpedicular instrumentation. Eur Spine J. 2014 Oct;23(10):2150-5. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3466-9. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1944564
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.