A Comparison of Stryker's Tritanium Posterior Lumbar Cage and PEEK Implant

NCT ID: NCT03817606

Last Updated: 2023-01-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

4 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-03-01

Study Completion Date

2021-04-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of patients with degenerative disc disease undergo lumbar spinal fusion with Stryker's Tritanium® Posterior Lumbar Cage or the UniLIF PEEK implant.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study protocol intends to examine the difference in efficacy between the Tritanium Posterior Lumbar Cage and the UniLIF PEEK implant with respect to how long it takes to achieve fusion of the spine. Study participants will undergo a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery and return for CT and x-ray follow-up to measure the degree to which fusion has been achieved. Survey methodology to assess perceived pain, level of disability, and quality of life will also be used to measure the differences between groups on these components.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Degenerative Disc Disease Degenerative Scoliosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Parallel randomized controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Study participants will not know which posterior lumbar cage they receive.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tritanium Posterior Lumbar Cage

Surgical placement of the Tritanium Posterior Lumbar Cage

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tritanium Posterior Lumbar Cage

Intervention Type DEVICE

Placement of Tritanium Posterior Lumbar Cage via TLIF procedure

AVS PEEK UniLIF

Surgical placement of the AVS PEEK UniLIF Posterior Lumbar Cage

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

AVS UniLIF PEEK Posterior Lumbar Cage

Intervention Type DEVICE

Placement of AVS UniLIF PEEK Posterior Lumbar Cage via TLIF procedure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tritanium Posterior Lumbar Cage

Placement of Tritanium Posterior Lumbar Cage via TLIF procedure

Intervention Type DEVICE

AVS UniLIF PEEK Posterior Lumbar Cage

Placement of AVS UniLIF PEEK Posterior Lumbar Cage via TLIF procedure.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject is skeletally mature
* Subject has one or more of the following diagnoses:

1. Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1

a. DDD may include up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s)
2. Degenerative Scoliosis for which the interbody fusion device will be used as an adjunct to fusion
* Subject has received 6 months of non-operative therapy
* Subject understands the conditions of enrollment and is willing to sign and date the Informed Consent
* Subject agrees to comply with visit schedule and study assessments
* Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
* Subject stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
* Subject is in good general health as evidenced by medical history

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject is obese (BMI \> 40)
* Subject is sensitive to titanium materials
* Subject has an active infection at the operative site
* Subject has marked local inflammation
* Subject has any abnormality present which affects the normal process of bone remodeling including, but not limited to, severe osteoporosis involving the spine, bone absorption, osteopenia, tumors involving the spine, active infection at the site, or certain metabolic disorders affecting osteogenesis
* Subject has any mental, trauma, or neuromuscular disorder which would create an unacceptable risk of fixation failure or complications in postoperative care
* Subject has any open wounds
* Subject is pregnant or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study
* Subject has inadequate tissue coverage over the operative site.
* Subject has an neuromuscular deficit which places an unsafe load on the device during the healing period
* Subject has any condition of senility, mental illness, or substance abuse
* Subject has any other medical or surgical condition which would preclude the potential benefit of spinal implant surgery, such as the presence of tumors, congenital abnormalities, elevation of sedimentation rate unexplained by other diseases, elevation of white blood cell count (WBC), or marked left shift in the WBC differential count.
* Subject has prior fusion at the levels to be treated
* Subject is incarcerated
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Stryker Spine

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Riverside Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Juan Jimenez

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lisa Zipsie

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Riverside Medical Center

Juan Jimenez, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Riverside Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Riverside Medical Center

Kankakee, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RMC193

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Lumbar Fusion With Porous Versus Non-Porous Cages
NCT05583864 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA