Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Artificial Cervical Disc - Low Profile Device at Two Adjacent Levels
NCT ID: NCT00637156
Last Updated: 2018-05-01
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
397 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-06-30
2018-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Safety & Effectiveness of PRESTIGE® LP Cervical Disc vs. Anterior Cervical Fusion in Cervical DDD
NCT00667459
PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc Study
NCT00642876
PRESTIGE Observational Study
NCT00875810
An Investigation of the Metal Concentration in Patients Implanted With the PRESTIGE LP™ Cervical Disc at Two Contiguous Levels in the Cervical Spine
NCT03062657
The Synergy Disc for the Treatment of 2 Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease Compared With Cervical Fusion Surgery
NCT05740176
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PRESTIGE LP Device
PRESTIGE LP device at two adjacent levels
PRESTIGE LP is a prosthetic device intended to replace a damaged disc in the cervical spine and intended to act as an intervertebral body spacer rather than a fusion device. It is inserted using an anterior surgical approach.
ATLANTIS Cervical Plate System
Bi-level fusion with ATLANTIS Cervical Plate System
Bi-level anterior cervical fusion procedure involving cortical ring allograft and the ATLANTIS Cervical Plate System.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PRESTIGE LP device at two adjacent levels
PRESTIGE LP is a prosthetic device intended to replace a damaged disc in the cervical spine and intended to act as an intervertebral body spacer rather than a fusion device. It is inserted using an anterior surgical approach.
Bi-level fusion with ATLANTIS Cervical Plate System
Bi-level anterior cervical fusion procedure involving cortical ring allograft and the ATLANTIS Cervical Plate System.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Has a herniated disc and/or osteophyte formation at each level to be treated that is producing symptomatic nerve root and/or spinal cord compression. The condition is documented by patient history, and the requirement for surgical treatment is evidenced by radiographic studies
* Unresponsive to non-operative treatment for approximately 6 weeks or has the presence of progressive symptoms or signs of nerve root/spinal cord compression in the face of continued non-operative management
* Has no previous surgical intervention at the involved levels or any subsequent planned/staged surgical procedure at the involved or adjacent level(s)
* Must be ≥ 18 years; skeletally mature at time of surgery
* Preoperative NDI score ≥ 30
* Preoperative neck pain score ≥ 8 based on the preoperative Neck and Arm Pain Questionnaire
* If a female of childbearing potential, patient is non-pregnant, non-nursing, and agrees not to become pregnant during the study period
* Is willing to comply with the study plan and sign Patient Informed Consent Form
Exclusion Criteria
* Has documented or diagnosed cervical instability relative to adjacent segments at either level, defined by dynamic (flexion/extension) radiographs showing: Sagittal plane translation \> 3.5 mm, or Sagittal plane angulation \> 20 degrees.
* Has more than two cervical levels requiring surgical treatment
* Has a fused level adjacent to the levels to be treated
* Has severe pathology of the facet joints of the involved vertebral bodies
* Has had previous surgical intervention at either one or both of the involved levels or at adjacent levels
* Has been previously diagnosed with osteopenia or osteomalacia
* Has any of the following that may be associated with a diagnosis of osteoporosis (If "Yes" to any of the below a DEXA Scan will be required to determine eligibility.)
* Postmenopausal non-Black female over age of 60 who weighs \< 140 pounds
* Postmenopausal female who has sustained a non-traumatic hip, spine, or wrist fracture
* Male \> 70 years
* Male \> 60 years who has sustained a non-traumatic hip or spine fracture
* If the level of BMD is a T score of -3.5 or lower or a T score of -2.5 or lower with vertebral crush fracture, then the patient is excluded from the study
* Has presence of spinal metastases
* Has overt or active bacterial infection, either local or systemic
* Has insulin dependent diabetes
* Is a tobacco user who does not agree to suspend smoking prior to surgery
* Has chronic or acute renal failure or prior history of renal disease
* Has a documented allergy or intolerance to stainless steel, titanium, or a titanium alloy
* Is mentally incompetent (If questionable, obtain psychiatric consult)
* Is a prisoner
* Is pregnant
* Is an alcohol and/or drug abuser as defined by currently undergoing treatment for alcohol and/or drug abuse
* Is involved with current or pending litigation regarding a spinal condition
* Has received drugs that may interfere with bone metabolism within two weeks prior to the planned date of spinal surgery (e.g., steroids or methotrexate), excluding routine perioperative anti-inflammatory drugs
* Has a history of an endocrine or metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis (e.g., Paget's Disease, renal osteodystrophy, Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, or osteogenesis imperfecta)
* Has a condition that requires postoperative medications that interfere with the stability of the implant, such as steroids. (This does not include low-dose aspirin for prophylactic anticoagulation and routine perioperative anti-inflammatory drugs.)
* Has received treatment with an investigational therapy within 28 days prior to implantation surgery or such treatment is planned during the 16 weeks following implantation
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medtronic Spinal and Biologics
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John K Burkus, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Hughston Clinic, P.C.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Orthopaedic Center; Crestwood Medical Center
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Todd Lanman, MD, FACS, A Professional Corp.;
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Bone & Spine Surgery
Colton, California, United States
La Jolla Neurological Associates, AMC; Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla; Scripps Memorial Hospital Encinitas
La Jolla, California, United States
St. Mary's Spine Center; St. Mary's Hospital
San Francisco, California, United States
Delaware Neurosurgical Group; Christiana Care Health Systems
Newark, Delaware, United States
Spinal Associates, Gulf Coast Hospital
Panama City, Florida, United States
Peachtree Neurosurgery, Northside Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
The Hughston Clinic, P.C., Hughston Hospital and Rehabilitation Center
Columbus, Georgia, United States
Neuro Spine & Pain Center; Lutheran Hospital
Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Great Lakes Neurosurgical; Spectrum Health East Campus
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Adams Neurosurgery; Mid Michigan Medical Center
Saginaw, Michigan, United States
Henry Ford Hospital
West Bloomfield, Michigan, United States
The Orthopedic Center of St. Louis; Barnes Jewish West County Hospital
Chesterfield, Missouri, United States
Montana Neuro Science Institute; St. Patrick's Medical Center
Missoula, Montana, United States
University at Buffalo Neurosurgery, Inc. Kaleida Health-Buffalo General Medical center/Gates Vascular Institute
Buffalo, New York, United States
Buffalo Neurosurgery Group
West Seneca, New York, United States
Crystal Clinic, Inc.; Akron General Medical Center
Akron, Ohio, United States
Central Ohio Neurological Surgeons; Mt. Carmel East Hospital
Westerville, Ohio, United States
The Center Orthopaedic & Neurosurgical Care & Research
Bend, Oregon, United States
OAA Orthopaedic Specialists
Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States
Allegheny Neurosurgery; Washington Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Lexington Brain and Spine Institute
West Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Center for Sports Medicine and Orthopaedics; Memorial Hospital
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
East Tennessee Brain & Spine Center, Johnson City Medical Center
Johnson City, Tennessee, United States
Central Texas Spine Institute; Health South Surgical Center
Austin, Texas, United States
Virginia Brain and Spine; Winchester Medical Center
Winchester, Virginia, United States
West Virginia University; Ruby Memorial Hospital, WVU Hospitals, Inc.
Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK, Hodges SD, McConnell JR, Dryer RF, Schranck FW, Copay AG. One-Level Versus 2-Level Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Fusion: Outcomes Up to 7 Years. Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Dec 31;13(6):551-560. doi: 10.14444/6076. eCollection 2019 Dec.
Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK, Dryer RF, McConnell JR, Hodges SD, Schranck FW. Two-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 10-year outcomes of a prospective, randomized investigational device exemption clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Jun 21;31(4):508-518. doi: 10.3171/2019.4.SPINE19157. Print 2019 Oct 1.
Lanman TH, Burkus JK, Dryer RG, Gornet MF, McConnell J, Hodges SD. Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Prestige LP artificial cervical disc replacement at 2 levels: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Jul;27(1):7-19. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.SPINE16746. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK, Hodges SD, McConnell JR, Dryer RF, Copay AG, Nian H, Harrell FE Jr. Cervical disc arthroplasty with the Prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, at 2 levels: results of a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial at 24 months. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Jun;26(6):653-667. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16264. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PRESTIGE LP Two Level Study
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.