Comparison of Software-assisted Implantation of Elastic Spine Pad (TM) With Respect to Postoperative Change in Neck Disability Index (NDI) With the Conventional Disc Spacer Squale (TM) After Anterior Cervical Discectomy for Cervical Disc Prolapse

NCT ID: NCT02936765

Last Updated: 2016-10-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-06-30

Study Completion Date

2019-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is an investigator-initiated study. The primary goal is to evaluate the efficacy of two different cervical disc devices (prosthesis vs rigid spacer) with respect to postoperative change in neck disability index. The evaluation will include clinical and radiological parameters.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intervertebral Disc Displacement

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Elastic spine pad

Patients, who receive Elastic Spine Pad (TM) as cervical disc prosthesis after ventral discectomy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Anterior cervical discectomy with prosthetic disc replacement / ESP.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Anterior cervical discectomy, with the use of the ESP prosthesis (Manufacturer: FH orthopedics, Mulhouse, France) for the disc replacement.

Squale

Patients, who receive Squale (TM) as cervical disc prosthesis after ventral discectomy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Anterior cervical discectomy with prosthetic disc replacement / Squale.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Anterior cervical discectomy, with the use of the Squale spacer (Manufacturer: OSD, Avignon, France) for the disc replacement.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Anterior cervical discectomy with prosthetic disc replacement / ESP.

Anterior cervical discectomy, with the use of the ESP prosthesis (Manufacturer: FH orthopedics, Mulhouse, France) for the disc replacement.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Anterior cervical discectomy with prosthetic disc replacement / Squale.

Anterior cervical discectomy, with the use of the Squale spacer (Manufacturer: OSD, Avignon, France) for the disc replacement.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Indication for monosegmental anterior cervical discectomy with implantation of a disc prosthesis

Exclusion Criteria

* Radiologic signs of extensive bone degeneration in the affected segment
* Necessity of implantation of a device smaller in height than 5 mm (as predicted with teh use of the Vertaplan (TM) software
* Transversal spine cord lesion
* Cervical myelopathy
* Preceding surgery on the cervical spine
* Traumatic lesions of the cervical spine
* Radiographic instability in the affected segment: flexion / extension: shift sagittal plane\> 3.5 mm or 20% and rotation in the sagittal plane \> 20 °, OR in static X-ray examinations: shift in the sagittal plane 3.5 mm or 20% of the vertebral body width and relative sagittal plane angulation \> 11º
* signs of instability (Olisthesis) in another segment of the cervical spine
* Active systemic infection
* diseases of the rheumatic type and all autoimmune diseases
* bone metabolic diseases (for example, Paget's disease)
* skeletal metastases
* infections in the cervical spine
* Neurological seizure disorders or other serious neurological disease with risk of falls
* Severe heart failure (NYHA III-IV)
* Bleeding disorders or clopidogrel / coumarins - treatment
* Systemic use of corticosteroids for more than a month in the last 12 months
* Pregnancy
* Legally incompetent patient
* Lactation
* Deformity, anomalies, not fully developed skeleton
* Local tumor disease
* Pre-existing neurologic abnormalities or other shortcomings, such as a Parkinson's disease, diabetic neuropathy, multiple sclerosis, peripheral neuropathy
* Drug / drug or alcohol dependence
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Technische Universität Dresden

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Uniklinikum Dresden

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Bernhard Rieger, Dr.

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCH_ESPvsSquale

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dynamic Stabilization Versus Fusion
NCT01365754 COMPLETED NA