PMCF Study to Evaluate the VERTICALE® Cervical System in Spine Surgery According to Its Intended Use.
NCT ID: NCT05489822
Last Updated: 2024-04-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
20 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-01-13
2026-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The VERTICALE® Cervical System is intended for immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments of the craniocervical junction (occipital-C2), subaxial cervical spine (C3-C7) and upper thoracic spine (T1-T3).
Primary Objective:
To assess the functional outcome and clinical benefit of the VERTICALE® Cervical System for the patient using the NDI (Neck Disability Index) questionnaire.
Primary endpoint hypothesis:
The investigators hypothesize that NDI improves by at least 10% or 5 points at 12 months FU (Follow-Up) compared with preoperatively.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety Study of Preservon-Treated Bone Implants for Cervical Fusion in the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy or Myelopathy
NCT00344890
Effectiveness and Safety of Mobile Artificial Cervical Vertebrae Replacement for Patients With Cervical Spondylosis
NCT04813211
Cervical Arthroplasty "Fixed Core" Versus "Movable Core": Clinical and Radiological Impact in the Medium Term
NCT02924506
Arthroplasty Versus Fusion in Anterior Cervical Surgery: Prospective Study of the Impact on the Adjacent Level
NCT00554528
Patient Outcomes Evaluation of the EBI Vuelock™ Anterior Cervical Plate System
NCT00726128
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The VERTICALE® Cervical System is intended for immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments of the craniocervical junction (occipital-C2), subaxial cervical spine (C3-C7) and upper thoracic spine (T1-T3).
The investigators interest is the continuous improvement of the surgical procedure in the context of degenerative cervical spine diseases. Patient satisfaction, as well as the avoidance of possible complications, are the main focus here. In addition, CE-certified medical devices must be evaluated for long-term performance and safety in clinical practice in accordance with the Medical Devices Act. The VERTICALE® Cervical System is a rod-screw system for immobilization (= immobilization) and stabilization of the affected segments, in the area between the occiput, the cervical spine and the upper thoracic spine (up to the 3rd thoracic vertebral body). Surgical intervention with the VERTICALE® Cervical System is performed from behind (posteriorly) and usually serves to stiffen the affected areas.
The goals of surgical intervention depend on the exact clinical picture and the associated symptoms, but usually consist of surgical relief of the affected structures of the nervous apparatus and/or spinal cord, stabilization of the bony structures to restore and/or maintain function, and relief of pain.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
VERTICALE® Cervical System
All measures and devices mentioned in the study protocol correspond to routine clinical practice with the exception of the following questionnaires:
NDI (Neck Disability Index) NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) neck pain (cervical spine) and NRS arm pain mJOA (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association) Score
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The surgical indication must be one or a combination of the following
* Degenerative disc disease (DDD)
* Instabilities
* Trauma
* Deformities
* Mono-, bi- and multisegmental restoration (occipital T3)
* Age: ≥ 18 years
* The subject must give written informed consent before inclusion into the PMCF study.
Exclusion Criteria
Under certain circumstances, implantation is prohibited or associated with substantial risks, even though there may be an indication for it.
These include in particular:
* Anticipated or documented allergy or intolerance to the materials (e.g., titanium or cobalt chromium).
* Active systemic infection or an infection localized to the site of the proposed implantation
* Any case in which the chosen implants would be too large or too small to achieve a successful result.
* Any patient for whom the use of the implant would conflict with anatomical structures.
* Missing bony structures, which would render solid anchoring of the implant impossible (e.g., in the case of fractures, tumors, or osteoporosis). In addition, the patient's occupation or activity level or mental capacity may be relative contraindications to this surgery. Specifically, patients who because of their occupation or lifestyle, drug abuse, may place undue stresses on the implant during bony healing and may be at higher risk for implant failure.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Silony Medical GmbH
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ankit I. Mehta, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System - UI Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System - UI Health
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vernon H. The Neck Disability Index: state-of-the-art, 1991-2008. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Sep;31(7):491-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.08.006.
Kato S, Oshima Y, Oka H, Chikuda H, Takeshita Y, Miyoshi K, Kawamura N, Masuda K, Kunogi J, Okazaki R, Azuma S, Hara N, Tanaka S, Takeshita K. Comparison of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and modified JOA (mJOA) score for the assessment of cervical myelopathy: a multicenter observational study. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 2;10(4):e0123022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123022. eCollection 2015.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TDII_2014-003_2.1_103
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.