Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
300 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2008-10-31
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Anterior cervical fusion with rhBMP-2, allograft corticocancellous bone as an interbody device, and anterior cervical plate fixation.
2. Posterior cervical fusion with rhBMP-2, local bone graft, with or without posterior screw fixation.
3. A combination of the previous two approaches: a combined anterior-posterior cervical fusion with rhBMP-2.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pilot Study of rhBMP-2/BCP in Patients With Spinal Degeneration With Instability Requiring Surgical Fusion
NCT01495234
Spine Fusion Instrumented With BMP-2 vs Uninstrumented With Infuse BMP-2 Alone
NCT00405600
Safety Study of Preservon-Treated Bone Implants for Cervical Fusion in the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy or Myelopathy
NCT00344890
Effectiveness and Safety of Mobile Artificial Cervical Vertebrae Replacement for Patients With Cervical Spondylosis
NCT04813211
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Posterior Cervical Fusion Supplemented With Interfacet Spacers
NCT04041583
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Anterior cervical fusion The technique of anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis of the spine has been previously described by Smith-Robinson (ref) and is an accepted technique for anterior cervical fusion. Upon completion of adequate decompression, a gentle distraction maneuver may be performed by using either Caspar distraction pins or an interbody spreading device, taking care to avoid injury to the endplates.
The endplates are then prepared with the use of a rasp or high speed burr taken to both superior and inferior endplates to remove the cartilagenous material and identify the bony endplate. Once hemostasis is obtained, the appropriate size allograft implant is chosen. That implant is then defrosted and brought into the surgical field. Concurrently, rhBMP-2 ((INFUSE®) Medtronic, Inc. Minneapolis, MN) has been reconstituted with sterile water, placed on an absorbable (type I bovine) collage sponge (ACS), cut to deliver the appropriate dose to each spinal level and is on the field as well. The partial BMP/ACS sponge is inserted into each disc space level, posterior to the structural implant. The dosage of rhBMP-2 used is approximately 0.525 mg per disc level or interbody space treated.
The interbody device utilized is LifeNet Health's VertiGraft® VG2®. In the case of these allograft intervertebral implants, product safety and efficacy has been validated and patented by LifeNet Health using both an Allowash® and Allowash XG® technology. This is an intensive decontamination, disinfection and scrubbing regimen to remove and inactivate both viruses and bacteria which may be present from the donor harvesting process. The Allowash® process removes virtually all cellular elements of the bone thereby providing an additional line of defense against infectious disease. The second step consists of terminal sterilization of the cortico-cancellous allograft tissue. These processes have been validated and render the tissue sterile without compromising either the biomechanical or biochemical properties of allograft tissue intended for spinal applications.
Plate fixation with the Atlantis® Cervical Plate (Medtronic, Inc. Minneapolis, MN) is carried out by serially drilling each of the screw holes and placing the appropriate length (3.5 x 14-15 mm) screw into each of the holes. The locking screw mechanism on the plate is then secured and a lateral cervical radiograph is called for to confirm appropriate levels and instrumentation placement. A medium Hemovac drain is placed in the anterior prevertebral space and brought out through a separate stab incision. Routine closure is then carried out.
2. Posterior Cervical Arthrodesis A longitudinal incision is made in the midline of the posterior neck, directly over the involved spinal level(s). The fascia and muscle are gently divided, exposing the spinous processes and lamina. An x-ray is obtained to confirm the appropriate spinal levels to be fused. A laminectomy and foraminotomy can be performed if necessary. Two (3.5 mm x 14mm) cortical screws ((Vertex (TM) Medtronic, Inc. Minneapolis, MN) are affixed to each lateral mass in the method previous described by Magerl (ref) and connected with a titanium rod on each side of the spine. The bony surfaces and facet joints are then decorticated. One sponge of the BMP/ACS product is placed over the decorticated bone surfaces on each side. The bone removed during the decompresion laminectomy is morsellized and placed in and around the facet joints. The amount of rh-BMP-2 used will be a total of 2.1 mg placed bilaterally, to a total of 4.2mg.
3. Combined Anterior-Posterior Cervical Arthrodesis This surgical procedure combines a posterior cervical decompression and fusion with an anterior cervical fusion. The techniques described for the individual surgical procedures are applicable to the combined Anterior-Posterior procedure. In an anterior-posterior surgery, the amount and positioning of rhBMP-2 will be similar to the anterior surgery (0.525 mg placed anteriorly at each level) or similar to the posterior surgery (2.4 mg across the entire lateral mass on each side posteriorly).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cervical arthrodesis candidates
Patients scheduled to undergo cervical arthrodesis to treat their spinal pathology will undergo cervical arthrodesis with rhBMP-2
Cervical arthrodesis with rhBMP-2
Cervical arthrodesis with rhBMP-2
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cervical arthrodesis with rhBMP-2
Cervical arthrodesis with rhBMP-2
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* CT, MRI scan, x-ray imaging are to include one or more of the following:
* Instability, as defined by translational motion greater than or equal to 3.5 mm or angular motion greater than 11° at a single segment based upon flexion/extension radiographs.
* Osteophyte formation.
* Decreased disc space height.
* Facet joint degeneration.
* Disc herniation or protrusion.
* Signs or symptoms of spinal cord compression (i.e., myelopathy).
* One or more symptomatic levels of degeneration between C3 and C7.
* Age 18 years of age or older at the time of surgery.
* Has not responded to nonoperative treatments including restricted activity, physical therapy, medications, corticosteroid injections, manipulation, TENS for a period of at least three months.
* If female of childbearing age who is not pregnant or nursing and who agrees to use adequate contraception for at least six months following surgery.
* Is willing and able to comply with the study protocol, sign the patient informed consent form, and able to sign the authorization to disclose health information consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
* Has been previously diagnosed with osteopenia, osteoporosis, or osteomalacia to a degree that spinal instrumentation would be contraindicated.
* Has active malignancy.
* Has overt or active bacterial infection, either local or systemic.
* Has fever (temperature greater than 101° Fahrenheit oral at the time of surgery).
* Has a documented titanium alloy allergy or allergy to bovine collagen.
* Is mentally incompetent.
* Has a Waddell sign of inorganic behavior score of 3 or greater.
* Is a prisoner.
* Is an alcohol and/or drug abuser, as defined by currently undergoing treatment for alcohol and/or drug abuse.
* Has a history of autoimmune disease.
* Has a hypersensitivity to protein pharmaceuticals, monoclonal antibodies, gammaglobulin, or collagen.
* Has a history of endocrine of metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis.
* Is currently pregnant or plans on becoming pregnant within the six months following the surgical procedure
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Virginia Spine Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Brian R Subach, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Virginia Spine Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Virginia Spine Institute
Reston, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ong KL, Villarraga ML, Lau E, Carreon LY, Kurtz SM, Glassman SD. Off-label use of bone morphogenetic proteins in the United States using administrative data. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Sep 1;35(19):1794-800. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ecf6e4.
Perri B, Cooper M, Lauryssen C, Anand N. Adverse swelling associated with use of rh-BMP-2 in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a case study. Spine J. 2007 Mar-Apr;7(2):235-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.010. Epub 2006 Nov 20.
Mroz TE, Wang JC, Hashimoto R, Norvell DC. Complications related to osteobiologics use in spine surgery: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 20;35(9 Suppl):S86-104. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d81ef2.
Cahill KS, Chi JH, Day A, Claus EB. Prevalence, complications, and hospital charges associated with use of bone-morphogenetic proteins in spinal fusion procedures. JAMA. 2009 Jul 1;302(1):58-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.956.
Williams BJ, Smith JS, Fu KM, Hamilton DK, Polly DW Jr, Ames CP, Berven SH, Perra JH, Knapp DR Jr, McCarthy RE, Shaffrey CI; Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Does bone morphogenetic protein increase the incidence of perioperative complications in spinal fusion? A comparison of 55,862 cases of spinal fusion with and without bone morphogenetic protein. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Sep 15;36(20):1685-91. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318216d825.
Fineberg SJ, Ahmadinia K, Oglesby M, Patel AA, Singh K. Hospital outcomes and complications of anterior and posterior cervical fusion with bone morphogenetic protein. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jul 1;38(15):1304-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828f494c.
Tumialan LM, Pan J, Rodts GE, Mummaneni PV. The safety and efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with polyetheretherketone spacer and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a review of 200 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008 Jun;8(6):529-35. doi: 10.3171/SPI/2008/8/6/529.
Frenkel MB, Cahill KS, Javahary RJ, Zacur G, Green BA, Levi AD. Fusion rates in multilevel, instrumented anterior cervical fusion for degenerative disease with and without the use of bone morphogenetic protein. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Mar;18(3):269-73. doi: 10.3171/2012.12.SPINE12607. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
Lanman TH, Hopkins TJ. Early findings in a pilot study of anterior cervical interbody fusion in which recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 was used with poly(L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide) bioabsorbable implants. Neurosurg Focus. 2004 Mar 15;16(3):E6.
Shields LB, Raque GH, Glassman SD, Campbell M, Vitaz T, Harpring J, Shields CB. Adverse effects associated with high-dose recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 use in anterior cervical spine fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Mar 1;31(5):542-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000201424.27509.72.
Boakye M, Mummaneni PV, Garrett M, Rodts G, Haid R. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion involving a polyetheretherketone spacer and bone morphogenetic protein. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005 May;2(5):521-5. doi: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.5.0521.
Stachniak JB, Diebner JD, Brunk ES, Speed SM. Analysis of prevertebral soft-tissue swelling and dysphagia in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in patients at risk for pseudarthrosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Feb;14(2):244-9. doi: 10.3171/2010.9.SPINE09828. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
Baskin DS, Ryan P, Sonntag V, Westmark R, Widmayer MA. A prospective, randomized, controlled cervical fusion study using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 with the CORNERSTONE-SR allograft ring and the ATLANTIS anterior cervical plate. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jun 15;28(12):1219-24; discussion 1225. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000065486.22141.CA.
Smucker JD, Rhee JM, Singh K, Yoon ST, Heller JG. Increased swelling complications associated with off-label usage of rhBMP-2 in the anterior cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 15;31(24):2813-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000245863.52371.c2.
Vaidya R, Carp J, Sethi A, Bartol S, Craig J, Les CM. Complications of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Eur Spine J. 2007 Aug;16(8):1257-65. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0351-9. Epub 2007 Mar 27.
Buttermann GR. Prospective nonrandomized comparison of an allograft with bone morphogenic protein versus an iliac-crest autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine J. 2008 May-Jun;8(3):426-35. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.12.006. Epub 2007 Mar 7.
Lu DC, Tumialan LM, Chou D. Multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without rhBMP-2: a comparison of dysphagia rates and outcomes in 150 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Jan;18(1):43-9. doi: 10.3171/2012.10.SPINE10231. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
Crawford CH 3rd, Carreon LY, McGinnis MD, Campbell MJ, Glassman SD. Perioperative complications of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on an absorbable collagen sponge versus iliac crest bone graft for posterior cervical arthrodesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jun 1;34(13):1390-4. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a2da08.
Cimic M, Smoljanovic T, Bojanic I. Re: Hiremath GK, Steinmetz MP, Krishnaney AA. Is it safe to use recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein in posterior cervical fusion? Spine 2009;34:885-9. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Feb 1;35(3):361; author reply 361-2. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cb4651. No abstract available.
Xu R, Bydon M, Sciubba DM, Witham TF, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A. Safety and efficacy of rhBMP2 in posterior cervical spinal fusion for subaxial degenerative spine disease: Analysis of outcomes in 204 patients. Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:109. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.83726. Epub 2011 Aug 13.
Hodges SD, Eck JC, Newton D. Retrospective study of posterior cervical fusions with rhBMP-2. Orthopedics. 2012 Jun;35(6):e895-8. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120525-30.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Virginia Spine Institute
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
08-07
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.