Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Spinal Sealant

NCT ID: NCT00594035

Last Updated: 2017-09-07

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

158 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-09-30

Study Completion Date

2008-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Spinal Sealant as an adjunct to sutured dural repair compared with standard of care methods (control) to obtain watertight dural closure in patients undergoing spinal surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Neurosurgical procedures in the spine often involve incision of the dura mater to access the spinal cord. If the dural incision is not properly repaired and watertight closure is not achieved cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can escape presenting a risk for significant morbidity. The most frequent complication of CSF leak is recurring headache complicated with symptoms of nausea and vomiting. Furthermore fluid collection under skin prevents proper wound healing and may lead to wound breakdown and infection of the incision or both. Persistent CSF leak has also been associated with the development of cerebellar hemorrhage and subdural hematoma. Primary repair and watertight closure are paramount to minimizing risk and sequelae associated with CSF leak.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Procedure Requiring Dura Incision

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Spinal Sealant

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Spinal Sealant System

Intervention Type DEVICE

2

Standard of care

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard of care

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard of care: devices intended to provide a watertight closure

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Spinal Sealant System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard of care

Standard of care: devices intended to provide a watertight closure

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

(i.e. devices intended to provide a watertight closure)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who are scheduled for an elective spinal procedure that requires a dural incision will be considered for study participation.
* Patient requires a procedure that involving surgical wound classification Class 1/Clean (per CDC criteria)
* Presence of a non-watertight dural closure, either spontaneously or upon Valsala maneuver at 20-25 cm H20 for 5-10 seconds.

Exclusion Criteria

* Active spinal and/or systemic infection
* Patient requires additional spinal surgery within the study time period
* Patient has had a previous spinal surgery involving dural exposure and/or entry at the same level(s) as the study procedure
* Patient has a pre-existing external lumbar CSF drain or internal CSF shunt
* Patient is participating in a clinical trial of another investigational device or drug
* Patient with creatinine \> 2.0 mg/dL
* Patient with total bilirubin \> 2.5 mg/dL
* Pregnant or breast-feeding females or females who wish to become pregnant during the length of study participation
* Patient has been treated with chronic steroid therapy (\>4 weeks) unless discontinued more than 6 weeks prior to surgery
* Patient has documented history or significant coagulopathy with a PTT \>35 sec, PT/INR \>1.2, receiving asprin, or NSAIDS at the time of surgery
* Patient receiving warfarin or heparin at the time of surgery
* Patient has a diagnosed and documented compromised immune system and/or autoimmune disease
* Patient has has chemotherapy treatment within 6 months prior to, or planned during the study
* Patient has had prior radiation treatment to the surgical site or has planned radiation therapy within 30 days post procedure
* Patient has known malignancy or other condition with prognosis shorter than 6 months
* Patients with documented history of uncontrolled diabetes
* Patient requires use of synthetic or non-autologous duraplasty material
* Patient has a gap greater than 2mm remaining after primary dural closure
* Patient has undergone laminoplasty decompression
* Patient has undergone a syringomyelia procedure where the shunt is not placed in the subarachnoid position
* Patient has undergone a Chiari Malformation procedure that does not entail a dural incision at or below the C1 level
* The investigator determines that participation in the study may jeopardize the safety or welfare of the patient
* The investigator determines that the patient should not be included in the study for reason(s) not already specified
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Integra LifeSciences Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Vladimir Scerbin

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Medtronic - MITG

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Confluent Surgical, Inc.

Bedford, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DRS-05-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cervical Interbody Implant Study
NCT04689854 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
rhBMP-2 in Cervical Arthrodesis
NCT02178605 COMPLETED
Lumbar Interbody Implant Study
NCT04418830 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION