Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
78 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-06-15
2022-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this prospective, observational study, 72 patients with cervical radiculopathy undergoing an initial ESI for this pain episode will undergo a comprehensive history and physical examination that includes the presence of Spurling test, midline and paraspinal tenderness, 9 non-organic tests in 5 categories, and 3 questionnaires to assess depression, anxiety, sleep, and somatization. The investigators will also evaluate patients' MRI results to determine patients' precise pathology. Patients will then receive interlaminar cervical ESI. The primary outcome measure will be the difference in the proportion of people with a positive categorical outcome, defined as a \>/= 2-point decrease in arm pain 4 weeks post-procedure coupled with a score \>/= 5 on a 7-point patient global impression of change (PGIC) scale 4 weeks post-treatment, indicating subjective improvement.
The main objectives of this study are to:
1. Determine the ability of physical exam, including non-organic signs, to predict ESI outcomes in individuals with cervical radicular pain.
2. Determine the prevalence of different non-organic signs, and the association with other factors that may be associated with non-organic illness such as psychopathology and multiple unrelated pain conditions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection
NCT04544683
Correlation of Intravascular Injection Rate and Severity of Cervical Neural Foraminal Stenosis
NCT04071483
Transforaminal Versus Lateralized Interlaminar Cervical Epidurals
NCT03389620
Dispersal Pattern for Spine Injections (Gadolinium Contrast)
NCT02217280
Comparative Trial Via Tranforaminal Approach Versus Epidural Catheter Via Interlaminar Approach
NCT03382821
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Non-organic signs that the investigators will evaluate are:
1. Tenderness
1. Superficial
2. Non-anatomical (e.g. cervical radicular pain causing tenderness in the arm or mid-back)
2. Sham stimulation
1. Downward pressure on head elicits neck pain
2. With hands clasped behind neck, passive rotation of shoulders elicits neck pain
3. Distraction
a. Inability to rotate head \> 45 degrees during overt range-of-motion testing, but significantly greater range of motion when patient is lying prone and asked to turn head to respond to physician request (e.g. sign paper, count fingers, answer question).
4. Regional disturbances
1. Sensory disturbances that deviate from normal neuroanatomy or pathology (e.g. single herniated disc causing pain throughout entire arm or radiating into lower back)
2. Motor disturbances that deviate from normal neuroanatomy or pathology (e.g. dramatic non-neurological weakness, give-away weakness)
5. Overreaction
1. Verbal (e.g. crying, screaming)
2. Non-verbal (e.g. exaggerated grimacing, clutching affected area, abnormally slow or rigid movements)
The investigators will evaluate MRI results to determine the precise pathology. Patients will then receive interlaminar cervical ESI. In accordance with standard practice, a Tuohy needle will be directed towards the side of the radicular pain, with correct needle position in the epidural space being confirmed with real-time contrast injection. Once the physician is satisfied with the spread, a 3 mL solution consisting of depo-methylprednisolone 40 mg + 2 mL normal saline will be injected. At Seoul National University, due to Korean healthcare regulations, the mixture will be a 3 mL solution containing 10 mg of dexamethasone and 2 mL saline. The primary outcome measure will be the difference in the proportion of people with a positive categorical outcome, defined as a \>/= 2-point decrease in average arm pain 4 weeks post-procedure coupled with a score \>/= 5 on a 7-point patient global impression of change (PGIC) scale 4 weeks post-treatment, indicating subjective improvement. Secondary outcome measures will include mean reductions in average and worst 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) arm pain scores over the past 7 days, mean reduction in average and worst neck pain scores, neck disability index (NDI) score, medication usage, patient global impression of change (PGIC), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8), and side effects. Individuals who experience a positive categorical outcome at 4 weeks will continue to be evaluated at 12 weeks, while those with a negative outcome will exit the study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cervical epidural steroid injection
This group will receive an interlaminar cervical ESI at C6-7 or C7-T1 with 1 mL steroid (depo-methylprednisolone 40 mg at Johns Hopkins and the DC VA Hospital or dexamethasone 10 mg at Seoul National University) and 2 mL normal saline.
Cervical epidural steroid injection
Interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injection with steroid and normal saline at C6-7 and C7-T1 (standard of care).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cervical epidural steroid injection
Interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injection with steroid and normal saline at C6-7 and C7-T1 (standard of care).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Cervical radicular pain based on history and physical exam (e.g. pain radiating into one or both extremities, sensory loss, muscle weakness, Spurling's test etc.)
* Pain duration \> 6 weeks
* Average NRS arm pain score \> 4
* MRI evidence of disc pathology consistent with symptoms
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous spine surgery
* No MRI study
* Epidural steroid injection within past 3 years
* Radiculopathy resulting from tumor or herpes zoster
* Signs or symptoms or myelopathy or spinal cord compression
* Allergic reactions to contrast allergy including macrocyclic gadolinium or depo-methylprednisolone
* Referrals from surgery for diagnostic injections for surgical evaluation
* Serious medical (e.g. congestive heart failure) condition that might preclude optimal outcome
* Pregnancy
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Washington DC VA Medical Center
UNKNOWN
Seoul National University
OTHER
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Steven P Cohen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
DC VA Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Seoul National University
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fishbain DA, Cole B, Cutler RB, Lewis J, Rosomoff HL, Rosomoff RS. A structured evidence-based review on the meaning of nonorganic physical signs: Waddell signs. Pain Med. 2003 Jun;4(2):141-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4637.2003.03015.x.
Waddell G, McCulloch JA, Kummel E, Venner RM. Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1980 Mar-Apr;5(2):117-25. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198003000-00005.
Jorritsma W, Dijkstra PU, De Vries GE, Geertzen JH, Reneman MF. Physical dysfunction and nonorganic signs in patients with chronic neck pain: exploratory study into interobserver reliability and construct validity. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 May;44(5):366-76. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4715. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
Cohen SP, Doshi TL, Dolomisiewicz E, Reece DE, Zhao Z, Anderson-White M, Kasuke A, Wang EJ, Hsu A, Davis SA, Yoo Y, Pasquina PF, Moon JY. Nonorganic (Behavioral) Signs and Their Association With Epidural Corticosteroid Injection Treatment Outcomes and Psychiatric Comorbidity in Cervical Radiculopathy: A Multicenter Study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2023 Jun;98(6):868-882. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.11.022. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00243203
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.