The Synergy Disc To Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

NCT ID: NCT04469231

Last Updated: 2025-11-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

175 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-10-30

Study Completion Date

2026-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A multicenter, prospective, non-randomized, historically controlled study. Demonstrate the Synergy Disc is at least as safe and effective as conventional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to treat cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) in subjects who are symptomatic at only one level from C3 to C7 that are unresponsive to conservative management. Patients will be evaluated preoperatively, at the time of surgery, and at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Follow-up will continue annually until the last patient reaches 24-month follow-up. The primary analysis will occur at 24 months.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The proposed investigation is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center, historically controlled comparison of the Synergy Disc to the control of conventional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery in patients with cervical DDD. A total of 175 patients will be enrolled to the investigational group. The investigational group results will be compared to a historical control data from the ACDF control group, which utilized an identical study design. A statistically rigorous observational study design using propensity score (PS) subclassification will be used to demonstrate covariate balance and enhance the quality of inferences regarding effectiveness and safety relative to ACDF control. After investigational device enrollment is complete, but before most investigational device subjects have reached their 24-month endpoint, a data set containing only baseline covariates of prospectively enrolled investigational device patients and historical ACDF control patients will be constructed. The propensity score methods detailed below will be implemented by an outcomes-blinded statistician. A Propensity Score Memo summarizing the proposed observational design will be developed and submitted for review by stakeholders including FDA. The outcomes-blinded statistician will remain blinded until after consensus is achieved that the design is acceptable. This will allow for additional outcomes-blinded PS modeling if required. The objective of this clinical trial is to demonstrate the Synergy Disc is at least as safe and effective as conventional ACDF to treat cervical DDD in subjects who are symptomatic at only one level from C3 to C7 that are unresponsive to conservative management.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

A multicenter, prospective, non-randomized, historically controlled study.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Synergy Disc

The Synergy Disc is a cervical disc prosthesis that can be inserted between C3-C7 in skeletally mature patients after anterior discectomy to provide restoration of motion to the functional spinal unit. The Synergy Disc is designed to restoring kinematics to the cervical spine. The Synergy Disc is intended for use in the cervical spine for reconstruction of the disc following a single level discectomy for intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Anterior Cervical Discectomy & Fusion

Intervention Type DEVICE

ACDF

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy & Fusion

ACDF

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ACDF

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 18 70 years;
2. Diagnosis of radiculopathy or myelopathy of the cervical spine, with either radiculopathy symptoms - pain, paresthesia, or paralysis in a specific nerve root distribution C4, C5, C6, or C7, including at least one of the following: arm/shoulder pain (at least 30 mm on 100 mm VAS scale); decreased muscle strength of at least one level on the 0-5 scale described below; abnormal sensation, including hyperesthesia or hypoesthesia; and/or abnormal reflexes; or myelopathy symptoms including positive Romberg evaluation, abnormal heel/toe walk, pathologic hyperreflexia or clonus in lower extremity, positive Babinski, or positive Hoffman's;
3. Symptomatic at only one level from C3-C4 to C6-C7;
4. Radiographically determined pathology at level to be treated correlating to primary symptoms, including at least one of the following:

1. Decreased disc height compared to adjacent levels on radiographic film, CT, or MRI
2. Degenerative spondylosis on CT or MRI
3. Disc herniation on CT or MRI.
5. Neck Disability Index (NDI) score ≥ 30/100;
6. Unresponsive to non-operative treatment for six weeks, or has the presence of progressive symptoms or signs of nerve root/spinal cord compression in the face of conservative treatment;
7. Appropriate for treatment using an anterior surgical approach, including having no more than one previous anterior surgical approach to the cervical spine;
8. Ability and willingness to comply with follow-up regimen; and
9. Written informed consent given by subject or subject's legally authorized representative.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Infection at the site of surgery;
2. History of, or anticipated treatment for, active systemic infection, including HIV infection or hepatitis C;
3. Prior attempted or completed cervical spine surgery, except (1) laminoforaminotomy (greater than 6 months prior to scheduled surgical treatment), which includes removal of disc material necessary to perform a nerve root decompression, with less than one-third facetectomy at any level, or (2) a successful single-level anterior cervical fusion (greater than 6 months prior to scheduled surgical treatment);
4. More than one immobile vertebral level between C1-T1 from any cause, including but not limited to congenital abnormalities, osteoarthritic "spontaneous" fusions, and prior cervical spinal fusions;
5. Previous trauma to the C3-T1 levels resulting in significant bony or disco-ligamentous cervical spine injury;
6. Axial neck pain in the absence of other symptoms of radiculopathy or myelopathy justifying the need for surgical intervention;
7. Radiographic confirmation of severe facet joint disease or degeneration.
8. Osteoporosis: A screening questionnaire for osteoporosis, SCORE (Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation) for females or MORES (Male Osteoporosis Risk Estimation Score), will be used to screen patients to determine those patients who require a Hip DXA, a bone mineral density measurement. A SCORE or MORES ≥ 6 requires a DXA. If DXA is required, exclusion will be defined as a DXA bone density measured T score ≤ -2.5 (The World Health Organization definition of osteoporosis). DXA scans within the last 6 months prior to surgical treatment may be used;
9. Paget's disease, osteomalacia, or any other metabolic bone disease (excluding osteoporosis which is addressed above);
10. Severe diabetes mellitus requiring daily insulin management;
11. Active malignancy: a history of any invasive malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer), unless the patient has been treated with curative intent and there have been no clinical signs or symptoms of the malignancy for at least 5 years;
12. Tumor as source of symptoms;
13. Symptomatic DDD or significant cervical spondylosis at two or more levels;
14. Marked cervical instability on resting lateral or flexion/extension radiographs demonstrated by:

1. Translation \> 3.5 mm and/or
2. 11° angular difference to that of either adjacent level;
15. Known or suspected allergy to cobalt, chromium, molybdenum, titanium, or polyethylene;
16. Severe myelopathy to the extent that the patient is wheelchair bound;
17. Congenital canal stenosis resulting in a canal diameter of \< 10 mm, as measured by CT or MRI;
18. Kyphotic segmental angulation of greater than 11 degrees at treatment or adjacent levels;
19. Arachnoiditis;
20. Pregnant (verified in patients of childbearing potential by a negative urine pregnancy test when pre-admission testing is obtained), or interested in becoming pregnant during the duration of the study;
21. Autoimmune disorders that impact the musculoskeletal system (e.g., lupus, rheumatoid arthritis; ankylosing spondylitis);
22. Congenital bony and/or spinal cord abnormalities that affect spinal stability;
23. Spinal axis disease (thoracic or lumbar) to the extent that surgical consideration is likely anticipated within 6 months after the cervical procedure;
24. Other degenerative joint disease (e.g. shoulder, hip, knee) to the extent that surgical consideration is likely anticipated within 6 months after the cervical procedure;
25. Diseases or conditions that would preclude accurate clinical evaluation (e.g. neuromuscular disorders such as diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH));
26. Medications that could interfere with fusion or other bone/soft tissue healing (e.g. anticipated continued use of systemic steroid medication postoperatively);
27. Currently experiencing acute episode of major mental illness (psychosis, major affective disorder, or schizophrenia), or manifesting physical symptoms without a diagnosable medical condition to account for the symptoms, which may indicate symptoms of psychological rather than physical origin;
28. Current or recent history of substance abuse (drug or alcohol) per site PI's determination;
29. Morbid obesity, defined as body mass index ("BMI") \> 40;
30. Currently using, or planning to use, bone growth stimulators in the cervical spine;
31. Use of any other investigational drug or medical device within the last 30 days prior to surgery;
32. Currently a prisoner;
33. Currently pursuing personal litigation (defined as litigation that will likely influence the patient's ability or willingness to accurately report their treatment outcomes) related to the neck or cervical spine injury; however, involvement in worker's compensation related litigation is not a required exclusion.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

MCRA

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Synergy Spine Solutions

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Barrow Brain and Spine

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

HonorHealth Research Institute/Barrow Brain and Spine

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Todd H. Lanman, M.D.

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Orthopedic Specialty Institute

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Institute of Neuro Innovation

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Anschutz Medical Center

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Kennedy White Orthopaedic Center

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Indiana Spine Group

Carmel, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Michigan Orthopedic Surgeons (2)

Southfield, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Michigan Orthopedic Surgeons

Southfield, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Upstate Medical University

East Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Hospital for Special Surgery

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Exiamia EquiHealth

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Summit Spine

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Center for Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Surgery (CSMO)

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Central Texas Brain & Spine

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Austin Neurosurgeons

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Spine Care Center

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

The Disc Replacement Center

West Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Atlantic Brain & Spine

Reston, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

110-00001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Restore CLINICAL TRIAL
NCT01609374 UNKNOWN NA
PCM Cervical Disc System
NCT00578812 COMPLETED PHASE3
PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc Study
NCT00642876 COMPLETED NA