Study of Safety & Effectiveness of PRESTIGE® LP Cervical Disc vs. Anterior Cervical Fusion in Cervical DDD
NCT ID: NCT00667459
Last Updated: 2023-06-06
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
280 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-01-31
2014-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Artificial Cervical Disc - Low Profile Device at Two Adjacent Levels
NCT00637156
PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc Study
NCT00642876
PRESTIGE Observational Study
NCT00875810
Pivotal IDE Study of the BRYAN(R) Cervical Disc Prosthesis in the Treatment of DDD Versus ACDF
NCT00437190
An Investigation of the Metal Concentration in Patients Implanted With the PRESTIGE LP™ Cervical Disc at Two Contiguous Levels in the Cervical Spine
NCT03062657
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Investigational
PRESTIGE® LP Cervical Disc
PRESTIGE® LP Cervical Disc
The PRESTIGE® LP Cervical Disc was inserted into the intervertebral disc space of the cervical spine using the anterior surgical approach.
Control
Control patients who received a ACDF fusion treatment from a previous IDE trial (NCT00642876)
ATLANTIS Anterior Cervical Plate
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with ATLANTIS plate for control group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PRESTIGE® LP Cervical Disc
The PRESTIGE® LP Cervical Disc was inserted into the intervertebral disc space of the cervical spine using the anterior surgical approach.
ATLANTIS Anterior Cervical Plate
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with ATLANTIS plate for control group
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* One level requiring surgical treatment
* C3-C4 disc to C6-C7 disc level involvement
* Unresponsive to non-operative treatment for six weeks or presence of progressive symptoms or signs of cord compression
* No previous surgical procedures at the involved level or any planned surgical procedure at the involved or adjacent level.
* Preop Neck Disability index score ≥ 30
* Preop Neck Pain score of ≥ 20 based on the Preop Neck \& Arm Pain Questionnaire
* Not pregnant at time of surgery
* Willing and able to comply with study plan and able to understand and sign patient informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Documented or diagnosed cervical instability defined by radiographs showing
1. Sagittal plane translation \> 3.5mm or
2. Sagittal plane angulation \> 20 degrees.
* More than one cervical level requiring surgery
* A fused level adjacent to the level to be treated
* Severe pathology of the facet joint of involved bodies
* Previous surgery at the involved level
* Previously diagnosed osteopenia or osteomalacia
* Any of the following that may be associated with an osteoporosis diagnosis (if "Yes" to any of these, a DEXA Scan will be required to determine eligibility)
1. Postmenopausal non-Black female over 60 years of age and weighs less than 140 pounds
2. Postmenopausal female that has sustained a non-traumatic hip, spine, or wrist fracture
3. Male over the age of 70
4. Male over the age of 60 that has sustained a non-traumatic hip or spine fracture.
If the level of Bone Mineral Density is a T score of -3.5 or lower or a T score of -2.5 or lower with the vertebral crush fracture, then the patient is excluded.
* Presence of spinal metastases
* Overt or active bacterial infection, either local or systemic
* Severe insulin dependent diabetes
* Chronic or acute renal failure or history of renal disease
* Temperature \> 101º F oral at surgery
* Documented allergy to stainless steel, titanium or a titanium alloy
* Mentally incompetent
* Is a prisoner
* Is pregnant
* Is an alcohol and/or drug abuser
* Has received drugs which may interfere with bone metabolism within 2 weeks prior to the planned surgery date (steroids, methotrexate), excluding routine preop anti-inflammatories)
* A history of endocrine or metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis
* A condition that requires postop medications that interfere with the stability of the implant (steroids). This does not include low dose aspirin therapy.
* Received treatment with an investigational therapy within 28 days prior to surgery or planned for 16 weeks following implantation.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medtronic Spinal and Biologics
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Emory Orthopaedics and Spine Center
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
The Hughston Clinic, P.C.
Columbus, Georgia, United States
Coeur d'Alene Spine and Brain, PLLC
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States
Central Illinois Neuroscience
Bloomington, Illinois, United States
Indiana Spine
Carmel, Indiana, United States
OrthoIndy
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Cedar Neurological Surgeons, PC
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, United States
Sports Medicine North
Peabody, Massachusetts, United States
The Orthopaedic Center of St. Louis
Chesterfield, Missouri, United States
Springfield Neurological Institute
Springfield, Missouri, United States
Buffalo Neurosurgery Group
West Seneca, New York, United States
NeuroSpine Institute, LLC
Eugene, Oregon, United States
Clinical Trials for South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Chattanooga Orthopaedic Group
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
Brain and Spine Center of Texas, L.L.P.
Plano, Texas, United States
University of Virginia,Neurosurgery Department
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK, Hodges SD, McConnell JR, Dryer RF, Schranck FW, Copay AG. One-Level Versus 2-Level Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Fusion: Outcomes Up to 7 Years. Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Dec 31;13(6):551-560. doi: 10.14444/6076. eCollection 2019 Dec.
Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Shaffrey ME, Schranck FW, Copay AG. Cervical disc arthroplasty: 10-year outcomes of the Prestige LP cervical disc at a single level. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 May 10;31(3):317-325. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.SPINE1956. Print 2019 Sep 1.
Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Shaffrey ME, Nian H, Harrell FE Jr. Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with Prestige LP Disc Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Seven-Year Outcomes. Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Jun 22;10:24. doi: 10.14444/3024. eCollection 2016.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PRESTIGE® LP Protocol, #P03-03
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.