The Synergy Disc for the Treatment of 2 Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease Compared With Cervical Fusion Surgery

NCT ID: NCT05740176

Last Updated: 2025-11-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-06-01

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A multicenter, prospective, non-randomized, historically controlled study. To demonstrate the Synergy Disc is at least as safe and effective as conventional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to treat cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) in subjects who are symptomatic at two levels from C3 to C7 are and are unresponsive to conservative management. Patients will be evaluated preoperatively, at the time of surgery, and at 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Follow-up will continue annually until the last patient reaches 24-month follow-up. The primary analysis will occur at 24 months.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The proposed investigation is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center, historically controlled comparison of the Synergy Disc to the control of conventional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery in patients with cervical DDD. A total of 200 patients will be enrolled to the investigational group .The objective of this clinical study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the two-level Synergy Disc compared to conventional two-level ACDF in skeletally mature patients for reconstruction of two contiguous discs from C3 to C7 following discectomy at two contiguous levels for intractable radiculopathy (arm pain and/or a neurological deficit) with neck pain or myelopathy due to abnormalities localized to the levels of the two contiguous disc spaces that are unresponsive to conservative management.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

multicenter, prospective, historically controlled
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Synergy Disc

The Synergy Disc is a cervical disc prosthesis that can be inserted between C3-C7 in skeletally mature patients after anterior discectomy to provide restoration of motion to the functional spinal unit. The Synergy Disc is designed to restore kinematics to the cervical spine. The Synergy Disc is intended for use in the cervical spine for reconstruction of the disc following a two level discectomy for intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Intervention Type DEVICE

Anterior cervical discectomy is a surgical procedure that was developed to treat damaged cervical discs by relieving pressure on the nerve roots or on the spinal cord by removing the ruptured disc. The operation is performed by reaching the cervical spine through a small incision in the front of the neck. The soft tissues of the neck are then separated allowing for the disc to be removed. Anterior cervical discectomy has proven to be a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of degenerative disc disease. The anterior approach allows direct visualization of the entire interspace and wide decompression of the anterior aspect cervical spinal cord and nerve roots. It may be undertaken in cases of multilevel disease and interbody fusion may be performed if required

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Anterior cervical discectomy is a surgical procedure that was developed to treat damaged cervical discs by relieving pressure on the nerve roots or on the spinal cord by removing the ruptured disc. The operation is performed by reaching the cervical spine through a small incision in the front of the neck. The soft tissues of the neck are then separated allowing for the disc to be removed. Anterior cervical discectomy has proven to be a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of degenerative disc disease. The anterior approach allows direct visualization of the entire interspace and wide decompression of the anterior aspect cervical spinal cord and nerve roots. It may be undertaken in cases of multilevel disease and interbody fusion may be performed if required

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ACDF

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, subjects must meet all of the following criteria:

1. Must be at least 18 years of age and be skeletally mature at the time of surgery
2. Has a preoperative neck pain score ≥ 8 (out of 20) based on the preoperative Neck and Arm Pain Questionnaire.
3. Has cervical degenerative disc disease at two (2) adjacent cervical levels (from C3 - C7) requiring surgical treatment and involving intractable radiculopathy, myelopathy, or both;
4. Has a herniated disc and/or osteophyte formation at each level to be treated that is producing symptomatic nerve root and/or spinal cord compression. The condition is documented by patient history (e.g., neck pain with arm pain, functional deficit and/or neurological deficit), and the requirement for surgical treatment is evidenced by radiographic studies (e.g., CT, MRI, x-rays, etc.);
5. Neck Disability Index (NDI) score ≥ 30/100 (raw score of ≥ 15/50);
6. Has been unresponsive to non-operative treatment for at least six weeks or has the presence of progressive symptoms or signs of nerve root/spinal cord compression in the face of continued non-operative management; has no previous surgical intervention at the involved levels or any subsequent planned/staged surgical procedure at the involved or adjacent level(s);
7. If a female of childbearing potential, patient is non-pregnant, non-nursing, and agrees not to become pregnant during the study period;
8. Is willing to comply with the study plan and sign the Patient Informed Consent Form

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

1. Has a cervical spinal condition other than symptomatic cervical DDD requiring surgical treatment at the involved levels;
2. Has documented or diagnosed cervical instability relative to adjacent segments at either level, defined by dynamic (flexion/extension) radiographs showing:

1. Sagittal plane translation \> 3.5 mm, or
2. Sagittal plane angulation \> 20°;
3. Prior attempted or completed cervical spine surgery, except (1) laminoforaminotomy (greater than 6 months prior to scheduled surgical treatment), which includes removal of disc material necessary to perform a nerve root decompression, with less than one-third facetectomy at any level, or (2) a successful single-level anterior cervical fusion (greater than 6 months prior to scheduled surgical treatment);
4. Has severe pathology of the facet joints of the involved vertebral bodies;
5. Axial neck pain only (no radicular or myelopathy symptoms);
6. Has been previously diagnosed with osteomalacia;
7. Osteoporosis: A screening questionnaire for osteoporosis, SCORE (Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation) for females or MORES for males (Male Osteoporosis Risk Estimation Score), will be used to screen patients to determine those patients who require a DXA of the hip, a bone mineral density measurement. A SCORE or MORES ≥6 requires a DXA. If DXA is required, exclusion will be defined as a DXA bone density measured T score ≤ -2.5 (The World Health Organization definition of osteoporosis). DXA scans within the last 6 months prior to surgical treatment may be used;
8. Has presence of spinal metastases;
9. Has overt or active bacterial infection, either local or systemic;
10. Has insulin-dependent diabetes;
11. Has chronic or acute renal failure or prior history of renal disease;
12. Known titanium or UHMWPE allergy;
13. Is mentally incompetent (if questionable, obtain psychiatric consult);
14. Is a prisoner;
15. Is pregnant ;
16. Is currently an alcohol and/or drug abuser or currently undergoing treatment for alcohol and/or drug abuse;
17. Is involved with current or pending litigation regarding a spinal condition;
18. Has received drugs that may interfere with bone metabolism within two weeks prior to the planned date of spinal surgery (e.g., steroids or methotrexate), excluding routine perioperative anti-inflammatory drugs;
19. Has a history of an endocrine or metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis (e.g., Paget's Disease, renal osteodystrophy, Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, or osteogenesis imperfecta);
20. Has a condition that requires postoperative medications that interfere with the stability of the implant, such as steroids. This does not include low-dose aspirin for prophylactic anticoagulation and routine perioperative anti-inflammatory drugs;
21. Has received treatment with an investigational therapy within 28 days prior to implantation surgery or such treatment is planned during the 16 weeks following implantation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

MCRA

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Synergy Spine Solutions

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Josh Butters, ME, MBA

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Synergy Spine Solutions

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

HonorHealth

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Todd Lanman, MD

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

DOCS Health Management LLC

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Institute of Neuro Innovation

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Steamboat Orthopaedic and Spine Institute

Steamboat Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Brain and Spine Center of South Florida

Delray Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Kennedy-White Orthopaedic Center

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Indiana Spine Group

Carmel, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Orthopedics Northeast

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Precision Spine and Orthopaedic Associates, PA

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Bone and Joint Clinic of Baton Rouge

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Louisiana Spine Institute

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Michigan Orthopedic Surgeons

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Carolina NeuroSurgery and Spine Associates, PA

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

M3 Emerging Medical Research

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Pinehurst Surgical Clinic

Pinehurst, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Summit Spine

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Oregon Spine Care

Tualatin, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Austin Neurosurgeons

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

DFW Center for Spinal Disorders

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Back Institute

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Spine Care Center

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

The Disc Replacement Center

West Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Atlantic Brain and Spine

Reston, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CP 110-0004

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Restore CLINICAL TRIAL
NCT01609374 UNKNOWN NA
PCM Cervical Disc System
NCT00578812 COMPLETED PHASE3
PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc Study
NCT00642876 COMPLETED NA