A Safety and Efficacy Study for Treatment of Painful Vertebral Compression Fractures Caused by Osteoporosis

NCT ID: NCT00290862

Last Updated: 2008-10-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

256 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-09-30

Study Completion Date

2009-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Doctors are studying an investigational treatment to be used during the vertebroplasty procedure when treating vertebral compression fractures (spine fractures) that may help to reduce pain and restore mobility. If one has experienced back pain for at least 4 weeks but not longer than 1 year, he/she may be eligible to participate.

The purpose of this protocol is to describe the methods for the clinical evaluation of Cortoss for vertebroplasty in patients with painful osteoporotic compression fractures.

Eligible patients with painful osteoporotic compression fractures of the spine are divided into two groups. Each enrolled patient will have the vertebroplasty procedure; however one group of patients will have the vertebroplasty procedure using polymethylmethacrylate \[PMMA\] (a Food and Drug Administration \[FDA\]-approved bone cement) and the other group of patients will have the vertebroplasty procedure using a relatively new (investigational) biomaterial called Cortoss.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective, multi-center randomized, controlled study designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Cortoss® Synthetic Cortical Bone Void Filler in vertebral augmentation using the percutaneous vertebroplasty technique. Study eligible patients with painful osteoporotic compression fractures will be randomized (2:1) to vertebroplasty with Cortoss (treatment group) or PMMA (control group), respectively. Patients will not be told which treatment they will receive (single blind study design). Safety and effectiveness will be determined by comparing the success rate of the treatment group to the success rate of the control group. Secondary endpoints will include Quality of Life, Patient satisfaction, evaluation of the patient's pain and function post-operatively compared to baseline, and maintenance of vertebral body height and alignment.

For the purposes of this study, vertebral augmentation, or vertebroplasty, is defined as a minimally invasive procedure utilizing manual instruments and radiological guidance to deliver an in-situ polymerizable material to stabilize a collapsed or fractured vertebral body. The goal is to alleviate pain caused by the fracture and enhance or prevent further deterioration of function.

This multi-center study will evaluate Cortoss for the augmentation of one or two vertebra(e), fractured as a result of osteoporosis, located between (and including) the levels of the sixth thoracic and the fifth lumbar vertebrae. A total of 243 patients will be enrolled at up to 19 sites. All subjects must have radiographic evidence of a vertebral body fracture due to osteoporosis. After complying with all eligibility criteria, subjects will sign an informed consent document and will be randomized into vertebroplasty treatment with Cortoss or PMMA (1:1 ratio). Patients will be followed for at least 24 months and recruitment is expected to take between 9 and 12 months. Visits and assessments are planned according to the time and events schedule.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Fractures

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Osteoporosis Spine fracture Back Pain Vertebroplasty Vertebral compression fractures related to osteoporosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CORTOSS

Patients prospectively randomized to be treated with Cortoss constitute treatment group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation of compression fractures

Intervention Type DEVICE

Study eligible patients with painful osteoporotic compression fractures will be randomized to percutaneous vertebroplasty with CORTOSS (treatment group) or PMMA (active control group).

PMMA

Patients prospectively randomized to be treated with PMMA constitute active control group.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation of compression fractures

Intervention Type DEVICE

Study eligible patients with painful osteoporotic compression fractures will be randomized to percutaneous vertebroplasty with CORTOSS (treatment group) or PMMA (active control group).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation of compression fractures

Study eligible patients with painful osteoporotic compression fractures will be randomized to percutaneous vertebroplasty with CORTOSS (treatment group) or PMMA (active control group).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CORTOSS, a Bis-GMA composite material, a vertebral augmentation strengthening agent. PMMA, commercially available poly methyl methacrylate material, on-label for vertebral augmentation.

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Are at least 18 years of age
* Have sustained a painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (VCF) for at least 4 weeks but no longer than 1 year or have radiographic evidence of at least 5% worsening vertebral collapse as compared to previous radiographic evidence
* Give written Informed Consent to participate in the study and be willing to comply with protocol requirements
* Have pain requiring the regular use of analgesics or have a substantially altered life-style due to pain or disability
* Have central pain over the spinous process upon palpation at the planned level(s)
* Are appropriately communicative to verbalize and differentiate with regard to location and intensity of their pain
* Are physically and mentally willing and able to comply with the clinical and radiographic follow-up schedule
* Have radiographic evidence of one or two, Grade 1 or greater according to Genant's criteria, osteoporotic VCF(s) between (and including) the level of the sixth (6th) thoracic to the fifth (5th) lumbar
* Have an acute or persistent (not healed) fracture demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or bone scan
* Have a patient self-assessment VAS score \>= 50 mm at the pre-treatment visit
* Have a 30% or greater disability score on the baseline ODI (version 2.0).

Exclusion Criteria

* Have significant vertebral collapse defined as more than 70% of original vertebral height, or a burst or pedicle fracture with posterior cortical wall disruption
* Have posterior vertebral wall displacement occupying more than 20% of the cross sectional area of the spinal canal
* Have neurologic symptoms or deficits, or radiculopathy related to the VCF
* Have pain based on a clinical diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus, high energy trauma, severe spinal stenosis as evidenced by progressive weakness or paralysis, or bone tumor at the level(s) of pathology as evidenced by computed tomography (CT) scan
* Have indications of instability related to the VCF at the level to be treated (e.g., neurologic deficit, kyphosis \> 30º, translation \> 4 mm, and/or interspinous process widening)
* Have canal compromise causing clinical manifestations of cord, neural foramen, or nerve root compression at the level(s) to be treated
* Have a bleeding disorder, including coagulopathy
* Have severe cardiopulmonary deficiencies
* Have an active systemic or local infection
* Are currently being treated for cancer or HIV
* Have a known allergy to acrylics (e.g., methyl methacrylate)
* Subject is currently an alcohol, solvent or drug abuser
* Female patients who are pregnant or nursing, or of childbearing potential not using a reliable contraceptive method
* Are involved in medical litigation
* Are prisoners
* Have participated in another investigational study within 30 days prior to inclusion
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Orthovita d/b/a Stryker

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Orthovita

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maarten Persenaire, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Orthovita, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Scottsdale Medical Center

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Core Orthopaedic Medical Center, P.C.

Encinitas, California, United States

Site Status

Eisenhower Medical Center

Rancho Mirage, California, United States

Site Status

St. John's Spine Institute

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Indian River Radiology

Vero Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory Orthopaedics and Spine Center

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Millenium Pain Center

Bloomington, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

The Spine Institute of Louisiana

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Washington University Medical Center

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS)

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Montefiore Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Mission Hospitals

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Dayton Interventional Radiology

Kettering, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Edmond Medical Center

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Mercy Health Center

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Pennsylvania Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Endovascular Center of Houston

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1100-0008

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id