A Safety and Efficacy Study for Treatment of Painful Vertebral Compression Fractures Caused by Osteoporosis
NCT ID: NCT00290862
Last Updated: 2008-10-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
256 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-09-30
2009-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The purpose of this protocol is to describe the methods for the clinical evaluation of Cortoss for vertebroplasty in patients with painful osteoporotic compression fractures.
Eligible patients with painful osteoporotic compression fractures of the spine are divided into two groups. Each enrolled patient will have the vertebroplasty procedure; however one group of patients will have the vertebroplasty procedure using polymethylmethacrylate \[PMMA\] (a Food and Drug Administration \[FDA\]-approved bone cement) and the other group of patients will have the vertebroplasty procedure using a relatively new (investigational) biomaterial called Cortoss.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For the purposes of this study, vertebral augmentation, or vertebroplasty, is defined as a minimally invasive procedure utilizing manual instruments and radiological guidance to deliver an in-situ polymerizable material to stabilize a collapsed or fractured vertebral body. The goal is to alleviate pain caused by the fracture and enhance or prevent further deterioration of function.
This multi-center study will evaluate Cortoss for the augmentation of one or two vertebra(e), fractured as a result of osteoporosis, located between (and including) the levels of the sixth thoracic and the fifth lumbar vertebrae. A total of 243 patients will be enrolled at up to 19 sites. All subjects must have radiographic evidence of a vertebral body fracture due to osteoporosis. After complying with all eligibility criteria, subjects will sign an informed consent document and will be randomized into vertebroplasty treatment with Cortoss or PMMA (1:1 ratio). Patients will be followed for at least 24 months and recruitment is expected to take between 9 and 12 months. Visits and assessments are planned according to the time and events schedule.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CORTOSS
Patients prospectively randomized to be treated with Cortoss constitute treatment group.
Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation of compression fractures
Study eligible patients with painful osteoporotic compression fractures will be randomized to percutaneous vertebroplasty with CORTOSS (treatment group) or PMMA (active control group).
PMMA
Patients prospectively randomized to be treated with PMMA constitute active control group.
Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation of compression fractures
Study eligible patients with painful osteoporotic compression fractures will be randomized to percutaneous vertebroplasty with CORTOSS (treatment group) or PMMA (active control group).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation of compression fractures
Study eligible patients with painful osteoporotic compression fractures will be randomized to percutaneous vertebroplasty with CORTOSS (treatment group) or PMMA (active control group).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Have sustained a painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (VCF) for at least 4 weeks but no longer than 1 year or have radiographic evidence of at least 5% worsening vertebral collapse as compared to previous radiographic evidence
* Give written Informed Consent to participate in the study and be willing to comply with protocol requirements
* Have pain requiring the regular use of analgesics or have a substantially altered life-style due to pain or disability
* Have central pain over the spinous process upon palpation at the planned level(s)
* Are appropriately communicative to verbalize and differentiate with regard to location and intensity of their pain
* Are physically and mentally willing and able to comply with the clinical and radiographic follow-up schedule
* Have radiographic evidence of one or two, Grade 1 or greater according to Genant's criteria, osteoporotic VCF(s) between (and including) the level of the sixth (6th) thoracic to the fifth (5th) lumbar
* Have an acute or persistent (not healed) fracture demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or bone scan
* Have a patient self-assessment VAS score \>= 50 mm at the pre-treatment visit
* Have a 30% or greater disability score on the baseline ODI (version 2.0).
Exclusion Criteria
* Have posterior vertebral wall displacement occupying more than 20% of the cross sectional area of the spinal canal
* Have neurologic symptoms or deficits, or radiculopathy related to the VCF
* Have pain based on a clinical diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus, high energy trauma, severe spinal stenosis as evidenced by progressive weakness or paralysis, or bone tumor at the level(s) of pathology as evidenced by computed tomography (CT) scan
* Have indications of instability related to the VCF at the level to be treated (e.g., neurologic deficit, kyphosis \> 30º, translation \> 4 mm, and/or interspinous process widening)
* Have canal compromise causing clinical manifestations of cord, neural foramen, or nerve root compression at the level(s) to be treated
* Have a bleeding disorder, including coagulopathy
* Have severe cardiopulmonary deficiencies
* Have an active systemic or local infection
* Are currently being treated for cancer or HIV
* Have a known allergy to acrylics (e.g., methyl methacrylate)
* Subject is currently an alcohol, solvent or drug abuser
* Female patients who are pregnant or nursing, or of childbearing potential not using a reliable contraceptive method
* Are involved in medical litigation
* Are prisoners
* Have participated in another investigational study within 30 days prior to inclusion
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Orthovita d/b/a Stryker
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Orthovita
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maarten Persenaire, M.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Orthovita, Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Scottsdale Medical Center
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Core Orthopaedic Medical Center, P.C.
Encinitas, California, United States
Eisenhower Medical Center
Rancho Mirage, California, United States
St. John's Spine Institute
Santa Monica, California, United States
Indian River Radiology
Vero Beach, Florida, United States
Emory Orthopaedics and Spine Center
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Millenium Pain Center
Bloomington, Illinois, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
The Spine Institute of Louisiana
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Washington University Medical Center
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS)
New York, New York, United States
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, United States
Mission Hospitals
Asheville, North Carolina, United States
Dayton Interventional Radiology
Kettering, Ohio, United States
Edmond Medical Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Mercy Health Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Pennsylvania Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Endovascular Center of Houston
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1100-0008
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id