Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Versus Conservative Treatment of Pain

NCT ID: NCT00203554

Last Updated: 2008-03-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

27 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-03-31

Study Completion Date

2008-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of vertebroplasty with that of traditional medical treatment in the treatment of painful vertebral fractures in osteoporotic patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In vertebroplasty a bone cement is injected in one or more fractured vertebra. The indication is pain that needs high doses of analgesics.

The cement is a well known product called poly methyl metacrylate (PMMA) normally used fixate joint prosthesis.

Vertebroplasty is done in local anaesthesia. The treatment was introduced in 1984 in France and today thousands of patients have been treated worldwide, but so far no randomized controlled trials have been published.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Osteoporosis Fracture

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

osteoporosis vertebra fracture pain percutaneous vertebroplasty polymethylmetacrylate

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Poly methylmetacrylate, PMMA

Intervention Type GENETIC

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* new pain in spine (within 6 months)
* x-ray verified low energy spinal fracture(s)

Exclusion Criteria

* less than 20% or more than 90% reduction of the vertebral height
* lack of pain at fracture level
* no need for continuous analgesic treatment
* patient no able to communicate
* general anaesthesia contraindicated
* MRI not possible
* coagulopathy (not adjustable)
* spondylitis
* discitis
* spinal metastasis
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Aarhus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Aarhus University Hospital

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Leif Sorensen, Consultant

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dep of Neuroradiology, Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20020306

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id