Comparative Study of Balloon Kyphoplasty and Conservative Treatment

NCT ID: NCT00749242

Last Updated: 2014-12-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

41 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-12-31

Study Completion Date

2012-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare two treatments in acute stable traumatic vertebral fractures (types A1, A2 and A3.1 in MAGERL Classification). The two treatments are the followings:

1. Conservative Orthopedic Management consisting of brace and pain medication.
2. Percutaneous Balloon Kyphoplasty, a variant of Vertebroplasty, in which a balloon is first placed into the fractured vertebra and inflated with fluid in order to create a cavity. This may restore part of the vertebral height loss due to the fracture and facilitate the injection of the cement with low pressure.

The primary outcome will be the variation in the angle of Regional Vertebral Kyphosis (or, in the case of asymmetrical fractures, the angle of lateral vertebral inclination) between inclusion and one year follow-up. It will indicate if Balloon Kyphoplasty is able to restore vertebral height of the fractured vertebra better than Conservative Orthopedic Management.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There is no reported frequency of stable thoracic or lumbar fractures traumatic fractures. However, the number of cases has been evaluated to be 61,425 yearly in Europe. Types A1 and A3.1 represent 61% of this number i.e. 37,468 per year in Europe and 4,600 in France.Conventional Conservative treatment of these fractures consists of brace and pain medication. However, a growing number of surgical teams use vertebroplasty or Balloon Kyphoplasty to avoid secondary fracture displacement after brace removal which results in increased kyphosis. However no study has compared the benefit of these new techniques to conservative managementThe goal of this study is to indicate if balloon kyphoplasty is able to restore vertebral height of the fractured vertebra better than Conservative Treatment.

1\. The conventional orthopedic treatment is based on The Böhler Brace which extends from the manubrium to the pubic symphysis allowing spinal immobilisation in position of lumbar lordosis. Patients wear it for 3 to 6 months. It is a non-invasive treatment. However, kyphotic spine angle may increase over time despite the brace due to spine loading .

2 . Balloon Kyphoplasty is a variant of vertebroplasty which is performed under general anaesthesia using the KyphX® System (Medtronic., Sunnyvale, California). Balloon kyphoplasty aims at restore vertebral height of the fractured vertebra using an inflatable balloon prior to inject surgical cement (PMMA) into the vertebral body to fix the fracture. It is an expensive technique costing around 4,000 euros for up to 2 vertebrae in the same patient. The surgical technique for the procedure has been described by Lieberman and al: A bilateral approach is chosen to insert working cannulas into the posterior part of the vertebral body through a posterior transpedicular approach. Fluoroscopy is used to insert the tools and control the procedure. With reaming tools, two working channels are created and the balloons are inserted. The balloons are available in lengths of 10, 15 and 20 mm.The two balloons(one on each side) should ideally be centered at middle height between the superior and inferior endplates and in the anterior two-thirds of the vertebral body. Balloon placement into the vertebral body is checked using radiopaque markers at the two extremities of the balloon. Once inserted, the balloons are inflated using visual, volume and pressure control to create a cavity. Inflation is stopped when one of the following inflation endpoints is reached: pressure raised over 400 psi, balloon contacts one of the cortical bone of the vertebra or reaching maximal balloon inflation volume. The balloons are then deflated and removed. The mean balloon inflation volume is 2 to 3ml. The Bone Filler Device, filled before with 1.5 ml of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), is then advanced through the working cannula towards the anterior part of the cavity and cement is slowly extruded by a stainless steel stylet, acting as a plunger. When the amount of cement from the first Bone Filler Device is delivered in the cavity, it is removed and another Bone Filler Device is advanced through the working cannula. This step is repeated till a complete fill of the cavity is obtained. The same procedure is repeated through the other working cannula at the contra-lateral pedicle. Filling of the cavity with highly viscous PMMA is performed under continuous fluoroscopic control.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

SPINAL Fracture

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Traumatic vertebral fracture Vertebroplasty Balloon kyphoplasty Bohler bracing

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

conventional orthopedic brace with antalgic treatment

Group Type OTHER

orthopedic brace

Intervention Type OTHER

antalgic drugs and orthopedic brace

2

balloon kyphoplasty introduction of balloon into the vertebral body, inflation of the balloon which creates a cavity, then balloon is deflated and removed , then introduction of the cement into the cavity.

Group Type OTHER

balloon kyphoplasty

Intervention Type DEVICE

introduction of balloon into the vertebral body, inflation of the balloon which creates a cavity, then balloon is deflated and removed , then introduction of the cement into the cavity.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

orthopedic brace

antalgic drugs and orthopedic brace

Intervention Type OTHER

balloon kyphoplasty

introduction of balloon into the vertebral body, inflation of the balloon which creates a cavity, then balloon is deflated and removed , then introduction of the cement into the cavity.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

böhler brace

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Preliminary clinical exam (the anesthetist must have provided his approval for the surgical procedure)
* Patient must have signed the consent form (ZELEN Randomization protocol)
* Male or Female, 18 years or older;
* Thoracic vertebral Kyphosis \>15° or Lumbar vertebral Kyphosis \> 10°, or Lateral angulation \> 10°.
* Pain with VAS ≥ 5.
* The benign nature of the vertebral fracture has to be confirmed by the results of the biopsy performed during balloon kyphoplasty, or by one year follow-up in the Böhler Brace Group.
* Technical feasibility of a balloon kyphoplasty and Bohler bracing within 7 days after patient randomization.

Exclusion Criteria

* Vertebral fracture of more than 10 day duration
* Vertebral fracture not located between T11 and L5
* Vertebral fracture type different from types A1, A2 and A3.1 according to MAGERL classification.
* Thoracic vertebral Kyphosis ≤ 15° or Lumbar vertebral Kyphosis ≤ 10°, or Lateral angulation ≤ 10°.
* Osteoporotic vertebral fracture
* Association to other post traumatic fractures.
* Neurological signs or symptoms related to the vertebral fracture
* History of spine fracture, kyphoplasty, spine surgery at thoracic or lumbar levels with low back pain.

History of surgery is not per sue a contraindication if there is no residual low back pain. However, in case of spinal fusion history, the fracture to be treated should be at minimum of two disc space from the most proximal or distal end of the fusion.

* Current infection
* Impossibility to perform the percutaneous approach of the vertebra to treat.
* Known allergy to the contrast product used during the Kyphoplasty procedure or to any of the cement components
* Reduction by more than 50% of the anteroposterior width of the bony spinal canal due to the vertebral fracture to treat.
* Vertebral fracture with loss of 90% or more of the vertebral body height
* Malignant and traumatic vertebral fractures
* Contraindication to MRI :

Metallic implant : pacemaker, non-movable auditive implant, metallic vascular or cardiac device Metallic surgical clips Claustrophobia

* Evolutive cardiac disease nonreactive to medical treatment
* Patient presenting a non correctable spontaneous or therapeutic coagulation disorder.
* Non compliant patient: Impossibility to participate to the study and to be followed up for 1 year.
* Pregnant or breast feeding women
* Patient not affiliated to social security
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ministry of Health, France

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jean-Denis LAREDO, MD, Pr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

AP-HP Assistance Publique- Hôpitaux de Paris

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hopital LARIBOISIERE Service de Radiologie Ostéo-Articulaire

Paris, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P060110

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id