Percutaneous Vertebral-disc Plasty for Thoracolumbar Very Severe Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures
NCT ID: NCT05519332
Last Updated: 2025-04-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-03-01
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This prospective study included elderly patients with thoracolumbar vsOVCFs. All the patients were randomly allocated into the PVP group (who underwent conventional PVP) and the PVDP group (who underwent PVP combined percutaneous cement discoplasty). The visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), local kyphosis angle, and disc height were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Comparative Study About the Effect of Vertebral Body Decompression Procedure
NCT02902250
Quality of Life After Vertebroplasty Versus Conservative Treatment in Patients With Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
NCT00994032
Efficacy of Kyphoplasty With a New Intervertebral Expander
NCT03521661
Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: Can Kyphoplasty Improve Lung Function? A Prospective Evaluation
NCT01609712
Vertebroplasty Compared With a Sham-procedure for Painful Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
NCT01537770
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Operative technique:In PVDP group, PVP and PCD both used a unilateral transpedicular approach into the vertebrae and disc. . Under general anesthesia, the patient was turned over to a prone position, and the deformity is reduced with a slight closed manipulative. Firstly, under fluoroscopic O-arm guidance, the puncture site was localized into the junction made by the transverse process and the superior articular process and entered the target area according to the puncture angle and depth measured before the operation. Secondly, the other puncture cannula was inserted into the intervertebral disc space adjacent to the ruptured endplate through the transpedicular access, and the target area was the middle of the intervertebral space. Thin-cut CT images were obtained intraoperatively by the O-arm fluoroscopy to confirm puncture needle placement location. Third, the bone cement was injected into the vertebrae and the intervertebral disc space, meanwhile, the cannula was also needed to move back to the vertebrae, and the bone cement in the vertebrae could connect the intervertebral disc space and the vertebrae to form a whole. Finally, the PVP group and the adjacent vertebrae performed by prophylactic vertebroplasty used bilateral pedicle puncture, under the guidance of the O-arm, two puncture needles were percutaneously inserted into the vertebrae, reaching about the middle of the vertebrae. Then, cement was slowly injected into the vertebral body, once cement leakage into the spinal canal or veins was detected, the injection was stopped.
The investigators measured radiological parameters including the local kyphotic angle (LKA), disc height anterior (DHA), and disc height posterior (DHP) from lateral plain radiographs preoperatively and at 1 day and final follow-up after surgery. The visual analog score (VAS) was used to assess the preoperative and postoperative back pain relief. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was used to assess the quality of life and was recorded preoperatively, postoperatively, and final follow-up.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PVDP group
Patients underwent percutaneous vertebral-disc plasty
percutaneous vertebral-disc plasty
percutaneous vertebroplasty combined percutaneous cement discoplasty
PVP group
Patients underwent conventional percutaneous vertebroplasty
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
percutaneous vertebral-disc plasty
percutaneous vertebroplasty combined percutaneous cement discoplasty
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* compression of the vertebral anterior column greater than two-thirds of their original height;
* Kyphosis with LKA greater than 20°;
* the accordion phenomenon: the different angles of a supine CT scan and a lateral standing X-ray measurement;
* upper or lower vertebral endplate fracture;
* the involved vertebral body was intact;
* Elderly patients with a history of major illness (such as cardiovascular disease, cancer or active malignancy) and were intolerant of the traditional open surgery.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with symptoms of nerve roots or spinal cord compression;
* Patients with a previous history of spinal fusion;
* A history of abnormal bleeding or coagulation disorder dysfunction.
58 Years
84 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Jiawei Jiang
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jiawei Jiang
resident physician
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Guanhua Xu, Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Affiliated 2 Hospital of Nantong University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Affiliated 2 Hospital of Nantong University
Nantong, Jiangsu, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
JJiang
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.