Cortical Bone Trajectory Screws vs. Traditional Pedicle Screws Fixation
NCT ID: NCT03105167
Last Updated: 2018-07-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
108 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-05-07
2021-12-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Modified Mini-Open TLIF vs Traditional Open TLIF
NCT07279051
A Modified Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion VS. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adult Degenerative Scoliosis
NCT04071665
Percutaneous Minimal Invasive Pedicular Screw and Rod Insertion in Circumferential Lumbar Fusion
NCT01513577
Comparison of Unilateral or Bilateral Fixation in the Treatment of LFS
NCT02985138
Cobalt Alloy Pedicle Screw Implantation for Severe Kyphosis Deformity in Spinal Tuberculosis
NCT02971644
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Ethics and dissemination: The study had been reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the Second affiliated hospital of the Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China(batch:2017-03). The results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and related website within 2 years after the last operation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CBT-TLIF group
Patients who are randomised to the CBT-TLIF group will have cortical bone trajectory screws instead of pedicle screws During the opreation. After preventive use of antibliotics,A small skin incision was made at the fused segment, an entry point for insertion of the CBT screws was drilled in the junction of the center of the superior articular process and 1 mm inferior to the inferior border of the transverse process according to Matsukawa et al.A straight probe was used to create a trajectory for the CBT screws from the entry point to the opposite corner of the pedicle and vertebral body under anteroposterior fluoroscopic guidance.nilateral facetectomy is performed to gain access to the intervertebral disc.Afterwards, interbody fusion was performed.Device: CBT screws.
cortical bone trajectory screws
cortical bone trajectory screws fixation takes the place of traditional pedicle screws fixation will be used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
PS-TLIF group
Patients who are randomised to the PS-TLIF group will have pedicle screws During the opreation. A posterior midline incision, about 6 cm, was performed at the level of interest level under fluoroscopic guidance. Pedicle screws were inserted into the vertebral body by using freehand, and the inferior and superior articular processes and part pf the lamina were removed by using an osteotome. To expose the lateral border of the ipsilateral nerve root, the ligamentum flavum was removed. Afterwards, interbody fusion was performed.Device:traditional pedicle screws.
pedicle screws
traditional pedicle screws fixation will be used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
cortical bone trajectory screws
cortical bone trajectory screws fixation takes the place of traditional pedicle screws fixation will be used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
pedicle screws
traditional pedicle screws fixation will be used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. All of participants will be informed consent;
3. Chronic low back pain (visual analogue scale at least 3 out of 10 at rest and at least 5 out of 10 under physical strain) after having failed conservative treatment for 6 months;
4. Single-segment lower lumbar vertebral disease (Including lumbar spinal cannal stenosis, foraminal stenosis, segmental instability, lumbar disc herniation, and painful disc degeneration (back disc);
Exclusion Criteria
2. Dysplasia of lumbar pedicle or vertebral laminar;
3. Obvious osteoporosis of lumbar vertebrae;
4. Metabolic bone diseases such as osteomalacia or Paget's disease;
5. Spondylolisthesis \> grade 2 (Meyerding);
6. Caudaequina injury or severe radiculopathy;
7. Post inflammatory instability of the vertebral spine;
8. Body mass index \> 30;
9. Immunologic diseases or Metabolic syndrome;
10. Therapy with systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressants;
11. Current using Coumadin (or Warfarin) or Heparin therapy for more than 6 months at the time of operation.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Wenfei Ni
director
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Resnick DK, Choudhri TF, Dailey AT, Groff MW, Khoo L, Matz PG, Mummaneni P, Watters WC 3rd, Wang J, Walters BC, Hadley MN; American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 8: lumbar fusion for disc herniation and radiculopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005 Jun;2(6):673-8. doi: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.6.0673.
Brayda-Bruno M, Tibiletti M, Ito K, Fairbank J, Galbusera F, Zerbi A, Roberts S, Wachtel E, Merkher Y, Sivan SS. Advances in the diagnosis of degenerated lumbar discs and their possible clinical application. Eur Spine J. 2014 Jun;23 Suppl 3:S315-23. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2960-9. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
Omidi-Kashani F, Hasankhani EG, Ashjazadeh A. Lumbar spinal stenosis: who should be fused? An updated review. Asian Spine J. 2014 Aug;8(4):521-30. doi: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.4.521. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
Harms JG, Jeszenszky D. Die posteriore, lumbale, interkorporelle Fusion in unilateraler transforaminaler Technik. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 1998 Jun;10(2):90-102. doi: 10.1007/s00064-006-0112-7. No abstract available. German.
Rouben D, Casnellie M, Ferguson M. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jul;24(5):288-96. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181f9a60a.
Santoni BG, Hynes RA, McGilvray KC, Rodriguez-Canessa G, Lyons AS, Henson MA, Womack WJ, Puttlitz CM. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. Spine J. 2009 May;9(5):366-73. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Sep 14.
Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Kato T, Imabayashi H, Asazuma T, Nemoto K. In vivo analysis of insertional torque during pedicle screwing using cortical bone trajectory technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Feb 15;39(4):E240-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000116.
Baluch DA, Patel AA, Lullo B, Havey RM, Voronov LI, Nguyen NL, Carandang G, Ghanayem AJ, Patwardhan AG. Effect of physiological loads on cortical and traditional pedicle screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Oct 15;39(22):E1297-302. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000553.
Perez-Orribo L, Kalb S, Reyes PM, Chang SW, Crawford NR. Biomechanics of lumbar cortical screw-rod fixation versus pedicle screw-rod fixation with and without interbody support. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 15;38(8):635-41. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318279a95e.
Matsukawa K, Kato T, Yato Y, Sasao H, Imabayashi H, Hosogane N, Asazuma T, Chiba K. Incidence and Risk Factors of Adjacent Cranial Facet Joint Violation Following Pedicle Screw Insertion Using Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jul 15;41(14):E851-E856. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001459.
Kasukawa Y, Miyakoshi N, Hongo M, Ishikawa Y, Kudo D, Shimada Y. Short-Term Results of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Pedicle Screw with Cortical Bone Trajectory Compared with Conventional Trajectory. Asian Spine J. 2015 Jun;9(3):440-8. doi: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.3.440. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, Dickersin K, Hrobjartsson A, Schulz KF, Parulekar WR, Krleza-Jeric K, Laupacis A, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013 Jan 8;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.
Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Nemoto O, Imabayashi H, Asazuma T, Nemoto K. Morphometric measurement of cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screw insertion using computed tomography. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Aug;26(6):E248-53. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318288ac39.
Dixon JS, Bird HA. Reproducibility along a 10 cm vertical visual analogue scale. Ann Rheum Dis. 1981 Feb;40(1):87-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.40.1.87.
M Versteegh M, M Vermeulen K, M A A Evers S, de Wit GA, Prenger R, A Stolk E. Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D. Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2940-52; discussion 2952. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017.
Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Oda T, Haku T, Yamamoto T, Iwasaki M. Surgical complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy in 251 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Apr;4(4):304-9. doi: 10.3171/spi.2006.4.4.304.
Hagg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A; Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2003 Feb;12(1):12-20. doi: 10.1007/s00586-002-0464-0. Epub 2002 Oct 24.
Ostelo RW, de Vet HC. Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005 Aug;19(4):593-607. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2005.03.003.
Wu C, Hu X, Liu R, Xu C, Jiang Y, Ge Z, Zhou K, Zhang D, Wu A, Dou H, Xu H, Tian N, Hu Z, Ni W. Comparison of the clinical and radiographic outcomes of cortical bone trajectory and traditional trajectory pedicle screw fixation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Spine J. 2024 Mar;33(3):1069-1080. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08086-5. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
Feng Z, Li X, Tang Q, Wang C, Zheng W, Zhang H, Wu AM, Tian N, Wu Y, Ni W. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws versus traditional pedicle screws fixation: a study protocol of randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 22;7(10):e017227. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017227.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SAHoWMU-CR2017-08-106
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.