Comparison of Unilateral or Bilateral Fixation in the Treatment of LFS

NCT ID: NCT02985138

Last Updated: 2022-01-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

53 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-31

Study Completion Date

2021-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

TLIF is a popular lumbar fusion technique to perform interbody fusion. Pedicle screws providing initial stability have been developed to correct deformity, improve the rate of fusion and speed patient's postoperative recovery. Conventionally, bilateral pedicle screw fixation is a standard approach. Recently, studies have revealed that unilateral pedicle screw fixation provides equivalent clinical outcomes and fusion rates as compared with bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar fusion. Meanwhile, the unilateral approach can reduce intraoperative blood loss and operating time. To our knowledge, few randomized controlled studies comparing unilateral versus bilateral instrumented TLIF in lumbar degenerative diseases have been reported. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes in a series of patients with lumbar foraminal stenosis using instrumented TLIF with unilateral or bilateral pedicle screw fixation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Unilateral fixation

Patients undergoing TLIF and unilateral pedicle screw fixation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

TLIF and unilateral pedicle screw fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TLIF combined with posterior unilateral pedicle screw fixation

Pedicle screw and cage

Intervention Type DEVICE

Pedicle screw and cage

Bilateral fixation

Patients undergoing TLIF and bilateral pedicle screw fixation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TLIF and bilateral pedicle screw fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TLIF combined with posterior bilateral pedicle screw fixation

Pedicle screw and cage

Intervention Type DEVICE

Pedicle screw and cage

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TLIF and unilateral pedicle screw fixation

TLIF combined with posterior unilateral pedicle screw fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TLIF and bilateral pedicle screw fixation

TLIF combined with posterior bilateral pedicle screw fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pedicle screw and cage

Pedicle screw and cage

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Signed informed consent.
* Patient is willing to be available for each examination scheduled over the study duration.
* Lumbar foraminal stenosis diagnosed by patient history, physical examination and image confirmation.
* Patient has symptoms referable to the stenosis level (low back pain, leg pain, tingling, numbness or weakness), which are relieved after a selective nerve root block.
* Has not responded to conservative treatment for a period of 3 months (e.g. bed rest, physical therapy, medication, manipulations, other).

Exclusion Criteria

* Has systemic infection, highly communicable diseases, inflammatory or autoimmune disease (e.g. osteomyelitis, crohn's, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus, gout, HIV/AIDS, active tuberculosis, venereal disease, active hepatitis).
* Has presence of active malignancy
* Has a history of severe allergy
* Has a significant medical history that, in the investigator's opinion, would not make them a good study candidate.
* Pregnant, or may become pregnant within follow-up period of study
* Has other spinal conditions that will interfere with clinical outcomes (e.g. spinal structural deformities, spinal fractures, ankylosing spondylitis, spinal tuberculosis, spinal infection, spinal tumors, symptomatic cervical spinal disease)
* Spondylolisthesis at the target level
* Has undergone previous lumbar surgery
* Has severe osteoporosis (T-score ≤ -3.5)
* BMI \> 35kg/m2
* Has a diagnosis, which requires postoperative medication that interferes with fusion, such as steroids.
* Has history of endocrine or metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis (e.g. Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy, Ehlers-Danios syndrome or osteogenesis imperfecta)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Xiaofei Cheng

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SNPHO-161116

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Titanium vs. PEEK Fusion Devices in 1 Level TLIF
NCT05691062 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE4
3Spine Lumbar Fusion Real World Evidence Study
NCT04823858 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Modified Mini-Open TLIF vs Traditional Open TLIF
NCT07279051 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Lumbar Fusion With Porous Versus Non-Porous Cages
NCT05583864 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA