Comparison of Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion(MIS-TLIF) for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
NCT ID: NCT06749314
Last Updated: 2025-04-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
66 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-05-01
2026-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT04778943
Unilateral Versus Bilateral TLIF for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
NCT03856554
MIS-D Versus MIS-TLIF for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT04318795
Evaluation of Treatment Effect of Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Surgery
NCT05190055
Comparative Outcomes of Conventional TLIF With Posterior Decompression Surgery Versus Endoscopic Foraminotomy Surgery
NCT06685575
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The participants were randomized into two groups with 33 cases each group (Total = 66) by using computer generated program with block of four randomization with allocation ratio 1:1. The control group received conventional treatment which is Minimal Invasive Surgery Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion while the experimental group received endoscopic lumbar decompression. Using ODI score as primary outcome. Data were analyzed using chi-square test for categorical data (eg, sex, symptoms of weakness and numbness, level of spondylolisthesis) and unpaired T-test for continuous data (eg. VAS score, ODI, slippage percentage, lumbar lordosis degree, slip angle, op time) which considered significant difference of the outcomes when p \< 0.05 with a power of 80%. Consider endoscopic decompression is non-inferiority to MIS-TLIF when upper limit of the one-sided 95%CI for the differences in ODI means is less than margin (12.8 points) If the results show that endoscopic decompression is non-inferiority to MIS TLIF, endoscopic lumbar decompression may be a choice of treatments giving benefit of minimal invasive surgery and avoid interbody fusion complication such as pseudoarthrosis, adjacent problems and operative blood loss
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lumbar Endoscopic - Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression
using endoscopic decompression for treatment
Lumbar Endoscopic - Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression
The LE-ULBD: Lumbar Endoscopic - Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression is a single portal through lamina with instrument to decompression both side of the spinal canal, giving strength of preserve facet joint, preserve spinal musculature, mitigate the risk of adjacent fusion and lesser bleeding
MIS-TLIF: Minimal Invasive Surgery - Transforaminal Lumbar interbody Fusion
Using conventional treatment, minimal invasive decompression with interbody fusion surgery for treatment in control groups
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lumbar Endoscopic - Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression
The LE-ULBD: Lumbar Endoscopic - Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression is a single portal through lamina with instrument to decompression both side of the spinal canal, giving strength of preserve facet joint, preserve spinal musculature, mitigate the risk of adjacent fusion and lesser bleeding
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Failed conservative treatment for at least 3 months.
* No instability evidence of levels of lesion (Consideration from translation more than 5 mm or angulation change more than 10 degree in flexion and extension L-S plain films ).
* Able to follow up for at least 12 months.
* Patient who vorantarily agree to participate in research.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who have previously undergone lumbar spine surgery (revision surgery).
* Patients with other abnormalities in the lumbar spine, such as infection, tumors, or fractures.
* Patients who cannot undergo surgery due to underlying conditions or who cannot maintain the prone position for extended periods.
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Queen Savang Nadhana Memorial Hospital
Chon Buri, , Thailand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
024/2567
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.