Minuteman Spinal Fusion Implant Versus Surgical Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT ID: NCT01455805
Last Updated: 2024-04-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-06-30
2024-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Surgical decompression for LSS involves the removal of excess bone, ligament, and soft-tissue allowing more room for the nerves. The operation is usually preformed under general anaesthetic and with an average stay in hospital for 2-3 nights. Whereas the Minuteman™ implant is preformed as a day case under local or general anaesthetic and involves implanting the device into the space between two back bones to relieve pressure on the nerves and, therefore, pain in the legs.
This is a multi centred (four sites) randomised controlled trial with a total sample of 50 participants after obtaining their informed consent. Participants will attend the pain clinic at the Hospitals for a baseline visit where they will be randomised with a ratio of 1:1 to receive either the Minuteman™ Interspinous interlaminar fusion Implant or standard surgical decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Following randomisation arrangements will be made for the participant to receive the randomised treatment. If allocated to Minuteman™ Implant, the treatment will be conducted by the Pain Specialist identified at the site. If allocated to surgical decompression, the treatment will be conducted by the neuro/spinal-surgeon identified at the site. Participates will be followed up regularly for 60 months post implant to assess clinical efficacy, safety, participants function and quality of life of each treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Instr. vs. Non-instr. Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Patients With Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Listhesis
NCT04166981
Prospective Study of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
NCT01045473
Interbody vs Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion Following Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
NCT01921530
Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Spinal Stenosis
NCT00022776
Post-Market Clinical Study of Functional Motion Outcomes in Subjects Treated With the Minuteman Device
NCT06355791
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Minuteman Fusion Implant
Minuteman™ interspinous interlaminar fusion Implant (interspinous interlaminar fusion device) which gained CE Mark approval in May 2011
Minuteman Fusion Implant
The Minuteman™ interspinous interlaminar fusion device consists of a central threaded portion that has a two-part wing plate hinged near its proximal end, with spikes on the extended distal end of the wing plate, and a multi-spiked end cap plate that is located at the distal end of the device and is retained and tightened in place with a locking hex nut. Compression between the spiked wing plate and the spiked end cap plate serves to fix the spinous processes in place and to facilitate fusion, together with bone graft fusion material placed within the device. The threaded external body has been designed to provide ease of distraction and insertion via a minimally invasive surgical procedure.
Surgical decompression
Surgical decompression refers to the following operations Laminectomy, Foraminotomy, Discectomy or any other surgical procedure that the clinician feels is relevant for the decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis.
surgical decompression
Surgical decompression refers to the following operations Laminectomy, Foraminotomy, Discectomy or any other surgical procedure that the clinician feels is relevant for the decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Minuteman Fusion Implant
The Minuteman™ interspinous interlaminar fusion device consists of a central threaded portion that has a two-part wing plate hinged near its proximal end, with spikes on the extended distal end of the wing plate, and a multi-spiked end cap plate that is located at the distal end of the device and is retained and tightened in place with a locking hex nut. Compression between the spiked wing plate and the spiked end cap plate serves to fix the spinous processes in place and to facilitate fusion, together with bone graft fusion material placed within the device. The threaded external body has been designed to provide ease of distraction and insertion via a minimally invasive surgical procedure.
surgical decompression
Surgical decompression refers to the following operations Laminectomy, Foraminotomy, Discectomy or any other surgical procedure that the clinician feels is relevant for the decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* BMI ≤ 35kg/m2
* Has chronic leg pain with or without back pain of greater than 6 months duration,which is partially or completely relieved by either sitting or adopting a flexed posture and who are suitable in the clinicians opinion for posterior lumbar surgery
* Pre-operative ODI score ≥ 20%
* Pre-operative ZCQ Physical Function Domain ≥2
* Pre-operative VAS Leg pain score ≥ 4
* Has completed at least 6 months of conservative treatment without obtaining adequate symptomatic relief or has worsening neurological symptoms.
* Has degenerative changes at 1 or 2 levels confirmed by MRI or CT Myelogram within the last 12 months) with one or more of the following:
* Lumbar spinal stenosis with intermittent neurogenic claudication
* Degeneration of the disc (as evidenced by imaging on MRI)
* Annular thickening
* Degenerative Spondylolisthesis ≤ Meyerding Grade 1
* Thickening of ligamentum flavum
Exclusion Criteria
* Has undergone previous lumbar spinal surgery
* Is unwilling or unable to give consent or adhere to the follow up schedule
* Has active infection or metastatic disease
* Has spondylolisthesis \> grade 1
* Has neurogenic bladder or bowel disease
* Has a history of Osteopenia and or Osteoporosis. Evaluation of possible Osteopenia and or Osteoporosis will be conducted via a bone density scan prior to randomisation if ANY of the Bone Mass Evaluation criteria is met
* Patients who are not deemed fit for anaesthesia/major surgery due to underlying medical condition
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER
Spinal Simplicity LLC
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ganesan Baranidharan, Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Taunton & Somerset NHS Foundation Trust of Musgrove Park Hospital
Taunton, Somerset, United Kingdom
The Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust
Ipswich, Suffolk, United Kingdom
Pain and Interventional Neuromodulation Research Group, Pain Management Dept, Seacroft Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Russell Hall Hospital
Birmingham, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SS2011UK
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.