Minimal Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar and Lumbosacral Spine Diseases
NCT ID: NCT06545032
Last Updated: 2024-08-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-09-30
2025-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Treatment Effect of Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Surgery
NCT05190055
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT04778943
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT03692845
Comparison of Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion(MIS-TLIF) for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
NCT06749314
Minuteman Spinal Fusion Implant Versus Surgical Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT01455805
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
As an alternative to PLIF, Harms and Rolinger introduced the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedure in 1982 for the management of degenerative spinal disorders that necessitate interbody fusions. The impetus for the development of TLIF was to provide a more lateral approach to the disc space, thus reducing the amount of thecal sac and nerve root retraction. Additionally, in revision cases where scar tissue hinders identification of neural structures, avoidance of midline scar planes with the TLIF procedure is beneficial. Moreover, a circumferential fusion can be achieved from a unilateral approach with the TLIF procedure without having to expose the bilateral epidural space (Karikari, Isaac O. MD; Isaacs, Robert E. MD, 2010).
Technological advances, better magnification and illumination, modern tubular retractors and percutaneous screw systems and more frequent exposure of surgeons to minimally access surgery in their residency training has greatly contributed to the global success of minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF). Traditional open spinal fusion surgeries, while effective, are associated with considerable tissue disruption, prolonged recovery times, and higher risks of complications(Prabhu et al., 2022).
MI-TLIFis one such advanced surgical technique designed to treat degenerative conditions of lumbar and lumbosacral spine diseases. Through the tubular expander, MIS-TLIF can reach the facet joints of the diseased segments. MIS-TLIF effectively reduces the peeling and traction injury of the multifidus muscle, prevents postoperative muscle atrophy, and reduces the occurrence of postoperative chronic LBP(Saela et al., 2023).
The MI-TLIF has shown reduced complications, decreased intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stays and recovery time, and decreased postoperative narcotic usage while maintaining similar clinical outcomes and fusion rates to conventional open TLIF since its inception (Hong et al., 2022).
The success of MI-TLIF can be attributed to the following fundamental principles: (1) minimizing damage to soft tissues and avoiding destabilization of the spinal segment(s) to achieve the surgical goal with the smallest possible operative footprint; (2) utilizing a unilateral approach to achieve bilateral decompression when needed; and (3) achieving neural decompression indirectly. Although there is no definitive definition of MI-TLIF, the lack of a precise definition has led to significant variations in how surgeons perform the procedure due to various technical nuances associated with each step(Lener et al., 2020).
The use of minimally invasive surgical techniques represents the most recent modification of methods used to achieve lumbar interbody fusion, based upon the premise that a smaller, less traumatic incision should afford better recovery and outcomes(Jang et al., 2024).Hence, in our study we aim to evaluate MI-TLIF for degenerative lumbar and lumbosacral spine diseases.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
lumbar fusion
Minimal Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Degenerative unilateral disc herniations.
* Recurrent disc herniation.
Exclusion Criteria
* Degenerative scoliosis .
* Traumatic fracture spine.
* Infections.
* Neoplasms.
* Debilitated patients .
* Coagulation dysfunction.
* Severe osteoporosis.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sohag University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Abdelaleem Mohamed Abdelrahman
assistant lecturer
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2940-52; discussion 2952. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017.
Hong JY, Kim WS, Park J, Kim CH, Jang HD. Comparison of minimally invasive and open TLIF outcomes with more than seven years of follow-up. N Am Spine Soc J. 2022 Jun 11;11:100131. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100131. eCollection 2022 Sep.
Jang HD, Lee JC, Choi SW, Hong CH, Suh YS, Shin BJ. A novel surgical approach using the "lateral corridor" for minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1: a clinical series and technical note. Eur Spine J. 2024 Jul;33(7):2611-2620. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08217-6. Epub 2024 May 31.
Le H, Anderson R, Phan E, Wick J, Barber J, Roberto R, Klineberg E, Javidan Y. Clinical and Radiographic Comparison Between Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Bilateral Facetectomies. Global Spine J. 2021 Jul;11(6):903-910. doi: 10.1177/2192568220932879. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
soh-med-24-07-3MD
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.