5-Year Global Study on MAST™ Minimally Invasive Fusion Procedures to Treat Degenerative Lumbar Spine (MASTERS-D2)

NCT ID: NCT02617563

Last Updated: 2026-01-21

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

361 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-12-31

Study Completion Date

2024-11-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is

* to evaluate the effectiveness of MAST techniques for anterior/lateral and posterior approaches in Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) patients with spondylolisthesis (≥ grade I).
* To assess how single or double level MAST(Minimal Access Spinal Technologies) fusion procedures PLIF (Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion), TLIF (Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion), DLIF (Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion), OLIF (Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion), ALIF (Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion), or MIDLF (Midline Lumbar Interbody Fusion) are used in surgical practice and to describe long-term safety and effectiveness in a broad patient population of patients with degenerative lumbar disc disease .

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this Prospective, Global (multi center), Post Market Release (PMR) Study, Patients will be submitted to a single or double level instrumented fusion procedure using a PLIF, TLIF, ALIF, OLIF, DLIF or MIDLF technique via a minimally invasive procedure and will receive the same medical treatment as if they would not participate in this study.

* The study will be monitored with visits conducted at the start, during and at the closure of the clinical study.
* MedDRA coding will be used to classify the Adverse Event.
* The study will be conducted according to Medtronic SOPs
* Sample size calculation: Assuming that the standard deviation for ODI improvement at 3 months is 20 for both groups (anterolateral and posterior) and there is no difference in the mean ODI improvement at 3 months, with 80% power and 5% alpha level, the sample size for the primary endpoint (DDD patients operated for spondylolisthesis) is as follows in order to claim equivalence between two groups with equivalent margin (-10, 10):
* Estimated sample size per group (anterolateral procedures versus posterior procedures): 70
* Estimated total sample size for spondylolisthesis patients: 140
* From the MASTERS-D study it is know that approximately 50% of the patients with degenerative disc disease have spondylolisthesis ≥ grade I. Hence the required total sample size is 140/0.5 = 280. The study is anticipated to enroll 350 patients.
* In addition to a final statistical analysis, 3 months and annual interim analyses are anticipated.
* The study hypothesis for the primary objective is to verify whether patients operated for spondylolisthesis (≥ grade I) have equivalent mean improvement of ODI at 3 months regardless of the minimally invasive surgical procedure (anterolateral or posterior) used.
* The null-hypothesis: Ho: Δ ODI\_Anterolateral ≠ Δ ODI\_posterior
* will be tested against the alternative hypothesis: HA: Δ ODI\_Anterolateral = Δ ODI\_posterior Where Δ ODI\_Anterolateral is the average improvement in ODI score (baseline - 3 months) in spondylolisthesis subjects treated with the anterolateral approach and Δ ODI\_posterior is the average improvement in ODI score (baseline - 3 months) in spondylolisthesis subjects treated with the posterior approach.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Minimally invasive lumbar fusion

A single or double level instrumented fusion using minimally invasive PLIF, TLIF, MIDLF, DLIF, OLIF, ALIF procedures for the treatment of the degenerative lumbar spine.

Minimally invasive lumbar fusion

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients will receive a single or double level instrumented fusion using a minimally invasive/MAST™ PLIF, TLIF, DLIF, OLIF, ALIF or MIDLF surgical procedure with a posterior fixation. For the use of a posterior fixation system, the CD Horizon™ Spinal System, is mandatory in this study and will be either mini-open and/or percutaneous.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Minimally invasive lumbar fusion

Patients will receive a single or double level instrumented fusion using a minimally invasive/MAST™ PLIF, TLIF, DLIF, OLIF, ALIF or MIDLF surgical procedure with a posterior fixation. For the use of a posterior fixation system, the CD Horizon™ Spinal System, is mandatory in this study and will be either mini-open and/or percutaneous.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient is ≥ 18 years of age (or minimum age as required by local regulations)
* Patient has degenerative disc disease and an indication for a single or double level instrumented lumbar fusion for the treatment
* Patient agrees to participate in the study and is able to sign the Data Release Form/Informed Consent
* The procedure planned for the patient complies with the labeling of the Devices that may be used in the surgical procedure as described in the section Medical Devices of the Clinical Investigation Plan
* Patient is planned to be submitted to a minimally invasive fusion procedure using a posterior (PLIF, TLIF, MIDLF) or anterolateral (OLIF, ALIF, DLIF ) technique\*

\*For a double level instrumented fusion, the same procedure must be used for both levels.
* The patient is willing and is able to perform study procedures and required follow-up visits.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient that has already undergone a lumbar fusion surgery
* Patient that has already undergone open lumbar surgery other than standard decompression surgery
* Indications for the procedure other than degenerative spine disease like: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures, Spine trauma fractures or Spine tumor
* Illiterate or vulnerable patients (e.g. minors, participants incapable of judgment or participants under tutelage)
* Concurrent participation in another clinical study that may confound study results.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic Spinal and Biologics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Kepler Universitatsklinikum

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

AZ Delta

Roeselare, , Belgium

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Cajuru

Curitiba, , Brazil

Site Status

The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University

Dalian, Liaoning, China

Site Status

West China Hospital Sichuan University

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Site Status

Shangai Tenth People's Hospital

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Nový Hradec Králové

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Glostrup Hospital

Glostrup Municipality, , Denmark

Site Status

Hôpital Civil de Strasbourg (NHC)

Eckbolsheim, , France

Site Status

CHRU de Lille, Hôpital Roger Salengro

Lille, , France

Site Status

Service de Neurochirurgie la Timone

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Klinikum Magdeburg

Magdeburg, , Germany

Site Status

A.O. Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Hospital Naval General de Alta Especialidad

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Hospital Escala Braga

Braga, , Portugal

Site Status

Centro Hospitalar de Sao Joao

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Nizhny Novgorod Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics of Public Health Ministry

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

A-klinik

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Department of Orthopedics, Korea University Ansan Hospital

Ansan, , South Korea

Site Status

National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital

Gyeonggi-do, , South Korea

Site Status

Department of Neurological Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital L'Horta Manises

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Hull Royal Infirmary

Hull, , United Kingdom

Site Status

East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust (was formerly Ipswich Hospital NHS)

Ipswich, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Argentina Austria Belgium Brazil China Czechia Denmark France Germany Italy Mexico Portugal Russia Slovakia South Korea Spain United Kingdom

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P15-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

OLIF25™ /OLIF51™ Study
NCT02657421 TERMINATED