5-Year Global Study on MAST™ Minimally Invasive Fusion Procedures to Treat Degenerative Lumbar Spine (MASTERS-D2)
NCT ID: NCT02617563
Last Updated: 2026-01-21
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
361 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-12-31
2024-11-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* to evaluate the effectiveness of MAST techniques for anterior/lateral and posterior approaches in Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) patients with spondylolisthesis (≥ grade I).
* To assess how single or double level MAST(Minimal Access Spinal Technologies) fusion procedures PLIF (Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion), TLIF (Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion), DLIF (Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion), OLIF (Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion), ALIF (Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion), or MIDLF (Midline Lumbar Interbody Fusion) are used in surgical practice and to describe long-term safety and effectiveness in a broad patient population of patients with degenerative lumbar disc disease .
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Prospective, Multicenter Observational Study on MAST™ (Minimal Access Spinal Technologies) Fusion Procedures for the Treatment of the Degenerative Lumbar Spine
NCT01143324
Minimal Access Surgical Technique (MAST) in Obese Patients in Degenerative Lumbar Disease. A Prospective Long-term Evaluation
NCT01259960
Minuteman Spinal Fusion Implant Versus Surgical Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT01455805
Minimal Access Surgical Technique (MAST) in Obese Patients in Degenerative Lumbar Disease
NCT01195584
A Study of Infuse® Bone Graft With Mastergraft® Strip and Posterior Fixation for Posterolateral Fusion (PLF) Treatment of Multi-Level Degenerative Lumbosacral Spinal Conditions
NCT03118505
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* The study will be monitored with visits conducted at the start, during and at the closure of the clinical study.
* MedDRA coding will be used to classify the Adverse Event.
* The study will be conducted according to Medtronic SOPs
* Sample size calculation: Assuming that the standard deviation for ODI improvement at 3 months is 20 for both groups (anterolateral and posterior) and there is no difference in the mean ODI improvement at 3 months, with 80% power and 5% alpha level, the sample size for the primary endpoint (DDD patients operated for spondylolisthesis) is as follows in order to claim equivalence between two groups with equivalent margin (-10, 10):
* Estimated sample size per group (anterolateral procedures versus posterior procedures): 70
* Estimated total sample size for spondylolisthesis patients: 140
* From the MASTERS-D study it is know that approximately 50% of the patients with degenerative disc disease have spondylolisthesis ≥ grade I. Hence the required total sample size is 140/0.5 = 280. The study is anticipated to enroll 350 patients.
* In addition to a final statistical analysis, 3 months and annual interim analyses are anticipated.
* The study hypothesis for the primary objective is to verify whether patients operated for spondylolisthesis (≥ grade I) have equivalent mean improvement of ODI at 3 months regardless of the minimally invasive surgical procedure (anterolateral or posterior) used.
* The null-hypothesis: Ho: Δ ODI\_Anterolateral ≠ Δ ODI\_posterior
* will be tested against the alternative hypothesis: HA: Δ ODI\_Anterolateral = Δ ODI\_posterior Where Δ ODI\_Anterolateral is the average improvement in ODI score (baseline - 3 months) in spondylolisthesis subjects treated with the anterolateral approach and Δ ODI\_posterior is the average improvement in ODI score (baseline - 3 months) in spondylolisthesis subjects treated with the posterior approach.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Minimally invasive lumbar fusion
A single or double level instrumented fusion using minimally invasive PLIF, TLIF, MIDLF, DLIF, OLIF, ALIF procedures for the treatment of the degenerative lumbar spine.
Minimally invasive lumbar fusion
Patients will receive a single or double level instrumented fusion using a minimally invasive/MAST™ PLIF, TLIF, DLIF, OLIF, ALIF or MIDLF surgical procedure with a posterior fixation. For the use of a posterior fixation system, the CD Horizon™ Spinal System, is mandatory in this study and will be either mini-open and/or percutaneous.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Minimally invasive lumbar fusion
Patients will receive a single or double level instrumented fusion using a minimally invasive/MAST™ PLIF, TLIF, DLIF, OLIF, ALIF or MIDLF surgical procedure with a posterior fixation. For the use of a posterior fixation system, the CD Horizon™ Spinal System, is mandatory in this study and will be either mini-open and/or percutaneous.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient has degenerative disc disease and an indication for a single or double level instrumented lumbar fusion for the treatment
* Patient agrees to participate in the study and is able to sign the Data Release Form/Informed Consent
* The procedure planned for the patient complies with the labeling of the Devices that may be used in the surgical procedure as described in the section Medical Devices of the Clinical Investigation Plan
* Patient is planned to be submitted to a minimally invasive fusion procedure using a posterior (PLIF, TLIF, MIDLF) or anterolateral (OLIF, ALIF, DLIF ) technique\*
\*For a double level instrumented fusion, the same procedure must be used for both levels.
* The patient is willing and is able to perform study procedures and required follow-up visits.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient that has already undergone open lumbar surgery other than standard decompression surgery
* Indications for the procedure other than degenerative spine disease like: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures, Spine trauma fractures or Spine tumor
* Illiterate or vulnerable patients (e.g. minors, participants incapable of judgment or participants under tutelage)
* Concurrent participation in another clinical study that may confound study results.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medtronic Spinal and Biologics
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
Buenos Aires, , Argentina
Kepler Universitatsklinikum
Linz, , Austria
AZ Delta
Roeselare, , Belgium
Hospital Universitario Cajuru
Curitiba, , Brazil
The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University
Dalian, Liaoning, China
West China Hospital Sichuan University
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Shangai Tenth People's Hospital
Shanghai, , China
Nový Hradec Králové
Hradec Králové, , Czechia
Glostrup Hospital
Glostrup Municipality, , Denmark
Hôpital Civil de Strasbourg (NHC)
Eckbolsheim, , France
CHRU de Lille, Hôpital Roger Salengro
Lille, , France
Service de Neurochirurgie la Timone
Marseille, , France
Klinikum Magdeburg
Magdeburg, , Germany
A.O. Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico
Milan, , Italy
Hospital Naval General de Alta Especialidad
Mexico City, , Mexico
Hospital Escala Braga
Braga, , Portugal
Centro Hospitalar de Sao Joao
Porto, , Portugal
Nizhny Novgorod Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics of Public Health Ministry
Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia
Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Novosibirsk, , Russia
A-klinik
Bratislava, , Slovakia
Department of Orthopedics, Korea University Ansan Hospital
Ansan, , South Korea
National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital
Gyeonggi-do, , South Korea
Department of Neurological Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital
Seoul, , South Korea
Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
Santander, , Spain
Hospital L'Horta Manises
Valencia, , Spain
Hull Royal Infirmary
Hull, , United Kingdom
East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust (was formerly Ipswich Hospital NHS)
Ipswich, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P15-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.