The Relaionship Between Sagittal Spinal Parameters and PSI
NCT ID: NCT06085651
Last Updated: 2023-10-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-06-01
2024-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) is a common complication that arises following STLF surgery, significantly impacting the appearance and satisfaction of patients8. The incidence of PSI varies within a range of 25% to 57%. It is imperative to identify the independent risk factors of PSI which can help in comprehending this phenomenon better and further aiding in deduction of the incidence rate. Although the research on the risk factors for PSI in AIS patients have been conducted for several years , no conclusively determination has been reached. Recently, scholars have been studying the relationship between the rotation of the thoracic spinal column and postoperative shoulder balance. Yagi et al.'s study10 has identified the preoperative rotation of the main thoracic apical vertebrae as a risk factor for PSI. Additionally, Masayoshi et al has reported on the relationship between the rotation of the proximal thoracic apical vertebrae and postoperative shoulder height disatance.
In summary, it can be hypothesized that the preoperative and changes of postoperative sagittal spinal parameters may impact the postoperative shoulder balance among AIS patients. However, there is a paucity of literature investigating the effect of sagittal spinal parameters on PSI after STLF surgery. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the correlation between the preoperative and postoperative alterations of sagittal spinal parameters and PSI.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Age on Surgical Outcome of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
NCT02819245
Surgical Outcomes and Complications of Posterior Spinal Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
NCT07092917
Comprehensive Cohort Study of Bracing for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS): A Feasibility Study
NCT00989495
A Modified Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion VS. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adult Degenerative Scoliosis
NCT04071665
Association Between Postural Balance and Muscle Activity of the Lumbar and Lower Limb Muscles in Female With or Without Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) During Standing Balance Tasks With Upper Limb Movement
NCT05127902
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although STLF can effectively improve the spinal deformity of AIS patients and has been used in clinical practice for many years, some scholars have found that while correcting the coronal imbalance of patients with this procedure, it often sacrifices the sagittal balance. The size of coronal and sagittal parameters in patients with spinal scoliosis can effectively assess the severity of spinal deformity. AIS, as a three-dimensional spinal deformity, has a correlation between sagittal and coronal deformities. Wu et al.'s study indicated that the main curve Cobb angle in AIS patients is related to sagittal parameters such as thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), and sacral slope (SS). Studies have shown that with the correction of the main curve, it may simultaneously lead to a decrease in sacral slope (SS) and an increase or decrease in thoracic kyphosis (TK). The sagittal structure of the spine is considered a chain-like structure, and when there is a change in any segment of the cervical, thoracic, lumbar spine, and pelvic segments, the remaining segments compensate to restore the sagittal alignment of the spine. Through the study of the shoulder joint and surrounding anatomy, it is known that the shoulder joint, spine, and clavicle are not directly connected but rely on soft tissues such as muscles and ligaments in between, and the support of the shoulder strap mainly relies on the rhomboid and trapezius muscles. The presence of the trapezius muscle allows the scapula to adhere closely to the chest wall, avoiding excessive elevation. When the strength of these muscles changes, the body may not be able to maintain shoulder balance. In recent years, it has been found that sagittal parameters of the spine, such as thoracic kyphosis and pelvic incidence angle, are related to the strength of the back muscles, such as the trapezius and rhomboid muscles. In addition, the magnitude of thoracic kyphosis (TK) may affect the rotation of the upper curve. Since the rotation axis of the spine is in front of the thoracic spine, when the thoracic kyphosis decreases, the distance between the thoracic vertebra and the spinal rotation axis is reduced, resulting in a simpler rotation of the thoracic vertebra in this segment. The final result may lead to an increase in the rotation degree of the upper curve. In recent years, Mitsuru Yagi proposed a new radiographic parameter, the Clavicle-Chest Cage Angle Difference (CCAD). Mitsuru Yagi found that the CCAD in patients with postoperative PSI group was significantly greater than that in the non-PSI group during preoperative, postoperative, and postoperative follow-up. Subsequent studies by Xiao et al. indicated that the preoperative CCAD can effectively predict whether AIS patients will develop PSI after surgery. Currently, the reasons for the occurrence of CCAD and how it affects postoperative shoulder balance in AIS remain inconclusive. Some scholars have proposed several possible reasons for CCAD leading to postoperative PSI in AIS patients: 1. The existence of residual CCAD after surgery may mean that there is residual rotational deformity in the upper curve of AIS patients after surgery. The residual rotational deformity of the upper curve may cause the elevation of the left shoulder, affecting the postoperative shoulder balance of the patients. 2. The residual rotation of the upper curve after surgery may lead to atrophy of the soft tissues connecting the shoulder joint, spine, causing atrophy of the shoulder joint, and eventually resulting in shoulder imbalance. The relationship between sagittal parameters of the spine and the strength of the soft tissues connecting the scapula, clavicle, and spine has been reported in previous studies. In conclusion, we hypothesize that the occurrence of postoperative PSI in AIS patients may be correlated with the preoperative and postoperative sagittal parameters of the patients Subject population
The subjects of this study sought medical treatment in the Department of Spinal Orthopedics, Southern Hospital, Southern Medical University, and referred to the "Clinical Practice
Diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using textbooks such as Orthopedics and Surgery, as well as imaging evidence
Adolescent idiopathic spine with protruding patients who require posterior selective thoracolumbar fusion surgery as determined by clinical physicians
Patients with scoliosis.
Diagnostic criteria:
The subjects of this study sought medical treatment in the Department of Spinal Orthopedics, Southern Hospital, Southern Medical University, and referred to the "Clinical Practice
Diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using textbooks such as Orthopedics and Surgery, as well as imaging evidence
Adolescent idiopathic spine with protruding patients who require posterior selective thoracolumbar fusion surgery as determined by clinical physicians
Patients with scoliosis.
Selection criteria:
1. Diagnosed as AIS upon admission;
2. The surgical age is 10-25 years old;
3. The surgical method is posterior selective thoracolumbar fusion;
The last reexamination was between January 2008 and May 2022;
5: AIS patients who need to collect complete imaging data before and after surgery;
5.3 Exclusion criteria:
Previous history of spinal trauma or spinal surgery;
6\. Research methods and steps
This is a retrospective case-control study, with plans to collect the last follow-up in January 2008
AIS patients undergoing posterior selective thoracolumbar fusion surgery at the Spinal Orthopedics Department of Southern Hospital between May 2022
Preoperative and postoperative imaging data, and all collected imaging data will be used using IBM SPSS
25.0 (or higher) for statistical analysis without the need for additional visits, laboratory analysis, or routine analysis
Evaluation beyond clinical practice requirements. Doctors will determine treatment plans based on diagnostic and treatment standards. Researchers will investigate
Review the patient's medical history and laboratory reports to determine their eligibility based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. This research application
Exemption from being informed, as the samples and information involved in the study are sourced from clinical diagnosis and treatment records and specimens
The risk of the patient does not exceed the minimum risk, and exemption from knowing will not have adverse effects on the patient's rights or health
And if informed research is obtained, it will not be possible to conduct, and the privacy and personal identity information of the subjects will be protected.
Informed consent and enrollment
This study applies for exemption from informed consent forms, and subjects who meet all other inclusion/exclusion criteria are considered
For inclusion in this study.
Subject identification number
Each patient and clinical tissue sample is given a unique identification number based on the imaging findings at the last follow-up examination
Is the difference in shoulder height (RSH) greater than 20mm? Divide patients into PSI group (RSH ≥ 20mm) and Non PSI group
(RSH \< 20mm). If the patient is in the Non PSI group and the enrollment order is 1, the identification number Non 01 will be given.
All research documents will use this identification number. This identification number does not contain any combination information that can identify the subject's identity.
Data source/data collection process
By collecting preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up imaging data from patients with AIS, this study aims to
data Case data, detailed data of relevant imaging parameters, and identification numbers are uniformly recorded by the researchers in the experiment
In the record table.
Data collection steps
Record demographic data: age, gender;
Collect preoperative and postoperative imaging parameters of patients included in this study; 7. Study Termination/Suspension Criteria
The applicant has the right to terminate/suspend this study. Applicants must be notified before terminating/suspending a clinical study
Researchers, ethics committees, and relevant regulatory authorities, and provide reasons. After early termination/suspension of the study, re
New research must be reviewed and approved by the ethics committee;
Termination/suspension requested by the Ethics Committee.
Provisions for ending clinical research.
All preoperative and postoperative imaging data of included patients have been collected.
data management
1 Data Management
1. Researchers must ensure that the data is true, complete, and accurate;
2. When making any corrections to the research records, only underline and annotate the revised data, explain the reasons, and have the research
Please sign and indicate the date, and do not erase or overwrite the original record;
3. The laboratory inspection items are complete.
Data recording and file storage
The relevant subject data on the case report form should be recorded in the subject coding format, and subjects can only use the
Identification of the subject's code or initials.
This study uses Microsoft Office for data management, and the verification from data entry to source data requires
Seek answers to questions about quality control data, and finally, after confirming the operation of data locking and exporting, and confirming that there are no doubts about the data,
All parties sign the database locking application form, and the data administrator will lock the database. After the database is locked,
Export the analysis database by the data administrator and submit it to the statisticians for statistical analysis. Locked data is not available
After further editing and database locking, any issues found can be corrected in the statistical analysis program after confirmation.
statistical analysis
Sample size determination
This study is a retrospective case study aimed at exploring the risk factors for shoulder imbalance in AIS patients after surgery
In a controlled study, the total sample size for current research on disease risk factors is 5-10% of the required number of factors to be explored
Therefore, this study plans to include 100 patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
statistical method
The analysis content includes case distribution, demographic data, and relevant imaging data that needs to be collected for this study.
Statistical software and general requirements: All statistical analysis shall be completed using IBM SPSS 25.0 (or higher version).
Measurement data is described using mean, standard deviation, median, maximum, and minimum values
Count data using frequency and percentage descriptions
Research management
Comply with relevant regulatory requirements
1. Researchers should use standard operating procedures to conduct quality control and quality assurance systems for clinical studies;
2. The original data must comply with relevant regulatory requirements;
3. The laboratory inspection results must be accurate and reliable;
4. All observations and findings used should be verified to ensure the reliability of the data;
5. Establish a complete research organization and clarify the responsibilities of personnel at all levels;
6. The main researchers are responsible for comprehensive quality control and carry out the responsibilities of personnel at all levels;
7. The main researcher is responsible for designing the research protocol and informed consent form. After the study is completed, the main researcher
Write a research summary report;
8. The designated researcher is responsible for developing research implementation rules and SOPs for use in the study;
9. Before the study, the research group organizes a learning plan for all participants, and all participants must go through the
GCP training;
10. Physicians and nurses participating in the study must strictly abide by the protocol regulations, follow the procedures, and are not allowed to change at will
Change;
11. The designated statistician is responsible for the comprehensive statistical processing of the data.
Protecting the privacy of subjects
All data of the subjects during the study period will be entered into a computer for confidential storage and analysis, if necessary
The shutdown organization may review the records to verify the authenticity, accuracy, and completeness of the data, and study the obtained information
It may also be published in academic journals, but the names of the participants will not be disclosed and their privacy will be kept confidential.
Take additional preventive measures to ensure the confidentiality of documents and prevent the identification of subjects based on genetic data
Identity. However, in special circumstances, some individuals may see the genetic data and individuals of a certain subject
Identification code. For example, in the event of medical emergency, the sponsor, their representative doctor, or researcher is aware that
Subject identification code and access to the subject's genetic data. In addition, relevant regulatory agencies require
Access relevant files.
The problems that occurred during the research and their handling measures 1) Revision of the plan: After approval by the Ethics Committee, if this plan needs to be revised, a "Plan Revision
Order instructions "and signed by the main researcher;
2\) After the plan is revised, it must be submitted to the Ethics Committee for review and approval before implementation;
3\) No participant in the study shall violate the protocol.
Quality Control and Quality Assurance
Quality assurance:
A cooperation agreement between the applicant and the person entrusted by the applicant to be responsible for all or part of the responsibilities and tasks related to this study
Each department (including CRO, SMO, statistical unit, clinical center, etc.) should establish their own quality assurance bodies
Department, fulfill their respective responsibilities, strictly follow the clinical research protocol, and adopt corresponding standard operating procedures,
To ensure the implementation of clinical research quality control and quality assurance system.
Quality assurance of clinical research process
Before initiation, researchers should receive training on the research protocol to enable them to understand the clinical research protocol and its
There is a thorough understanding and understanding of the specific connotations of each indicator. Quality control personnel should verify the basic conditions of clinical research,
Ensure that the clinical research conditions meet the protocol requirements. During the research process, researchers should follow the institutional SOP and research
The plan requires careful execution of clinical procedures and other work, and truthful, timely, complete, and standardized recording.
Quality control personnel conduct quality checks on the research process and corresponding original records. After the study is completed, the study form
Organize the corresponding project documents, verify them by quality control personnel, and archive and save them. Quality Assurance of Clinical Research Units
The department conducts feasibility checks on the research conducted. Notify researchers promptly when non conformities are found
Make corrections with the unit leader and track the progress of the corrections.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PSI group
we divided all patients into two groups according to their RSH in the final follow-up time: PSI group (RSH≥20mm)
Selective thoracolumbar fusion (STLF) surgery
Selective thoracolumbar fusion (STLF) surgery, is an established corrective surgical technique for spinal deformities with excellent outcomes over time
Non-PSI
we divided all patients into two groups according to their RSH in the final follow-up time: Non-PSI group (RSH≤20mm)
Selective thoracolumbar fusion (STLF) surgery
Selective thoracolumbar fusion (STLF) surgery, is an established corrective surgical technique for spinal deformities with excellent outcomes over time
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Selective thoracolumbar fusion (STLF) surgery
Selective thoracolumbar fusion (STLF) surgery, is an established corrective surgical technique for spinal deformities with excellent outcomes over time
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
10 Years
25 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NFEC-2023-225
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.