Novel Technique Lumber Spine Fusion: Unilateral Pedicular Screws Fixation Combined With Contralateral Interbody Cage
NCT ID: NCT05238662
Last Updated: 2022-02-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-01
2023-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
● Alternative hypothesis (H1):
Unilateral pedicle screw with contralateral interbody cage gives the same outcomes as unilateral pedicle screw fixation with ipsilateral cage.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Comparison Between the Stand-alone Cage and the Autologous Iliac Bone Graft/Anterior Plating in the Single-level Surgical Treatment of the Cervical Spine
NCT02030899
Instr. vs. Non-instr. Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Patients With Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Listhesis
NCT04166981
A Modified Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion VS. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adult Degenerative Scoliosis
NCT04071665
Primary Sacroiliac Fusion Versus Fusion to the Sacrum for Degenerative Disease of the Lumbar Spine
NCT04308018
Gait and Balance in Thoracolumbar Spinal Deformity
NCT02761265
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Fusion rate, cage migration, and biomechanical stress were the main draw backs of unilateral approach by lumber interbody fusion with ipsilateral cage and screws. Cage size and location seemingly the main reasons with advice to use large cage and cage insertion in oblique fashion to cross the midline. This study was designed to solve these issues.
Sample size:
The Study will include 40 patients divided into two groups, each group containing 20 patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
pedicle screw fixation on one side and intervertebral cage on the other sided
pedicle screw fixation on one side and intervertebral cage on the other sided
pedicle screw fixation on one side and intervertebral cage on the other sided
Group B
pedicle screw fixation and interbody cage on the same side
pedicle screw fixation and interbody cage on the same side
pedicle screw fixation and interbody cage on the same side
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
pedicle screw fixation on one side and intervertebral cage on the other sided
pedicle screw fixation on one side and intervertebral cage on the other sided
pedicle screw fixation and interbody cage on the same side
pedicle screw fixation and interbody cage on the same side
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Both sexes.
* Age (21-60) years old.
* Patients with monosegmental lumber degenerative spinal diseases including lumbar spondylosis, spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis grade one, or lumbar disc prolapse.
Exclusion Criteria
* Altered mental status.
* Patients with associated comorbidity interfere with surgery.
* Extremes of age.
* Multiple level lumbar degenerative disease
* Trauma
* Spinal tumour
* Active infection
* Previous lumbar operation
21 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Zagazig University
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
wael Abdelrahman Elmesallamy
principle investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wael Elmesallamy, M.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Zagazig University, Faculty of human medicine
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
9181
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.