Novel Technique Lumber Spine Fusion: Unilateral Pedicular Screws Fixation Combined With Contralateral Interbody Cage

NCT ID: NCT05238662

Last Updated: 2022-02-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-01

Study Completion Date

2023-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

● Null hypothesis (H0): Unilateral pedicle screw with contralateral interbody cage has better outcomes than unilateral pedicle screw fixation with ipsilateral cage.

● Alternative hypothesis (H1):

Unilateral pedicle screw with contralateral interbody cage gives the same outcomes as unilateral pedicle screw fixation with ipsilateral cage.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Lumber interbody fusion is one of the commonest neurosurgical procedures. A lot of studies showed the value of unilateral approach which resulted in less cost, time and radiation exposure when use interbody cage with ipsilateral pedicular screws fixation in comparison to bilateral approach when use interbody cage with bilateral pedicular screws fixation.

Fusion rate, cage migration, and biomechanical stress were the main draw backs of unilateral approach by lumber interbody fusion with ipsilateral cage and screws. Cage size and location seemingly the main reasons with advice to use large cage and cage insertion in oblique fashion to cross the midline. This study was designed to solve these issues.

Sample size:

The Study will include 40 patients divided into two groups, each group containing 20 patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Treatment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A

pedicle screw fixation on one side and intervertebral cage on the other sided

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

pedicle screw fixation on one side and intervertebral cage on the other sided

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

pedicle screw fixation on one side and intervertebral cage on the other sided

Group B

pedicle screw fixation and interbody cage on the same side

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

pedicle screw fixation and interbody cage on the same side

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

pedicle screw fixation and interbody cage on the same side

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

pedicle screw fixation on one side and intervertebral cage on the other sided

pedicle screw fixation on one side and intervertebral cage on the other sided

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

pedicle screw fixation and interbody cage on the same side

pedicle screw fixation and interbody cage on the same side

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient acceptance.
* Both sexes.
* Age (21-60) years old.
* Patients with monosegmental lumber degenerative spinal diseases including lumbar spondylosis, spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis grade one, or lumbar disc prolapse.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusal.
* Altered mental status.
* Patients with associated comorbidity interfere with surgery.
* Extremes of age.
* Multiple level lumbar degenerative disease
* Trauma
* Spinal tumour
* Active infection
* Previous lumbar operation
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zagazig University

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

wael Abdelrahman Elmesallamy

principle investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Wael Elmesallamy, M.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Zagazig University, Faculty of human medicine

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Wael Elmesallamy, M.D

Role: CONTACT

01142453993 ext. 002

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

9181

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Utility of Postoperative Bracing
NCT03947541 COMPLETED NA
LUMBAR & SACROILIAC FUSION STUDY
NCT07204288 RECRUITING NA
Fusion Status After ACDF
NCT05986006 UNKNOWN NA