Patient Positioning in Lumbar Fusion Surgery and Its Impact on Spinal Sagittal Balance and Surgeon Satisfaction

NCT ID: NCT01326091

Last Updated: 2015-06-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

7 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-03-31

Study Completion Date

2015-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a parallel, randomized controlled trial comparing two types of patient positioning and their effect on radiologic measures (pre-surgery visit, in the operating room prior to surgery, at the conclusion of surgery, and at 3 weeks after surgery at patients' postoperative visits) as well as surgeon satisfaction (prior to the end of the surgery) and patient outcomes using patient self reported scales (pre-surgery, post surgery at 3 weeks follow-up).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators are evaluating how patient positioning affects radiologic metrics as well as surgeon satisfaction (surgeon being blinded to positioning). Patients will be allocated to either a hyperlordotic or a standard positioning group by computer generated randomization. Surgeons will perform all of their standard techniques to promote lordosis with instrumentation. Adult patients, ages 18-65, undergoing lumbar surgical fusion will be asked to participate.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intervertebral Disk Degeneration

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard Positioning

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Hyperlordotic Positioning

Hyperlordotic positioning will be achieved through pelvic pads positioned low on iliac crest to maximize lumbar hyperlordosis and increased hip flexion with as many pillows as tolerated at thighs and knees to allow for increased sacral slope. Regular position will involve the pelvic pads at above or iliac crest and without extra pillows at thighs and legs.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hyperlordotic Positioning

Intervention Type OTHER

Hyperlordotic positioning will be achieved through pelvic pads positioned low on iliac crest to maximize lumbar hyperlordosis and increased hip flexion with as many pillows as tolerated at thighs and knees to allow for increased sacral slope. Regular position will involve the pelvic pads at above or iliac crest and without extra pillows at thighs and legs.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hyperlordotic Positioning

Hyperlordotic positioning will be achieved through pelvic pads positioned low on iliac crest to maximize lumbar hyperlordosis and increased hip flexion with as many pillows as tolerated at thighs and knees to allow for increased sacral slope. Regular position will involve the pelvic pads at above or iliac crest and without extra pillows at thighs and legs.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults patients, aged between 18 and 65 years of age
* Patients undergoing lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients \< 18 years of age or \> 65 years of age
* Patients who have a history of metastatic disease
* Patients who currently have a pending workman's compensation claim
* Patients who have had a previous spinal surgery
* Patients who have or have had a spinal infection
* Patients who have a spinal deformity, such as scoliosis
* Women who are pregnant
* Inpatients
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Duke University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Oren N Gottfried, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00028159

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dynamic Stabilization Versus Fusion
NCT01365754 COMPLETED NA