A Study Comparing Fusion Rates of Two Lumbar Fusion Procedures
NCT ID: NCT01972256
Last Updated: 2014-06-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-04-30
2014-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Subject candidates are those who had previously required and received fusion at L4-L5-S1 where these were the only lumbar levels treated for pseudoarthrosis, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, or degenerative disc disease (DDD).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of Health Economic Drivers and Complications for Two Lumbar Fusion Procedures
NCT02171169
Posterior Lateral Fusion (PLF) With Dynesys
NCT00791180
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT03726190
Unilateral Versus Bilateral TLIF for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
NCT03856554
Comparison of Complication Rates Between Initial and Re-operative Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: Is There a Difference?
NCT05945550
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Previous transsacral fusion
Subject candidates are those who had required a transsacral fusion at L4-L5-S1 where these were the only lumbar levels treated for pseudoarthrosis, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, or degenerative disc disease (DDD).
No interventions assigned to this group
Previous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
Subject candidates are those who had required transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at L4-L5-S1 where these were the only lumbar levels treated for pseudoarthrosis, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, or degenerative disc disease (DDD).
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male or female subject that had previously received the transsacral two-level procedure when used in conjunction with pedicle screw or facet screw fixation or TLIF two-level procedure with unilateral or bilateral supplemental screw fixation (e.g. pedicle screws, facet screws at L4-L5-S1 to treat pseudoarthrosis, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, or degenerative disc disease (DDD)
* Subject that was treated no less than 2 years prior to this evaluation with an transsacral or TLIF procedure by the participating surgeons
* Subject that had a diagnosis that required a transsacral or TLIF procedure at the L4-L5-S1 levels and did not require treatment at any other lumbar levels at the time of surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* Subject who received lumbar fusion procedures at levels other than L4-L5-S1 at the time of surgery
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Baxano Surgical, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education
Tampa, Florida, United States
Indiana Spine Group
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Bone and Joint Clinic of Baton Rouge
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
Michigan Spine Institute
Waterford, Michigan, United States
Brazos Spine
College Station, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PR-0023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.