Rate of Bone Union After Surgery With Stand-alone Fibergraft

NCT ID: NCT07199075

Last Updated: 2025-09-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-31

Study Completion Date

2026-05-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Some people have back problems caused by degenerative conditions or instability of the spine (eg. Spondylolisthesis). These problems can lead to pain, nerve issues, or difficulties in walking. A common treatment is a type of back surgery called lumbar interbody fusion, which helps stabilize the spine.

At the St. Maartenskliniek in the Netherlands, doctors have been using a special material called Fibergraft Bioactive Glass Putty for such surgeries since 2023. This material helps bones grow and heal, and it's placed inside the spine without needing extra bone from another part of the body.

This study will look at how well this material works by evaluating how many patients' bones successfully healed after surgery using this material. It will also look at how patients feel and recover after the procedure

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Lumbar interbody fusion is an established procedure for patients with lumbar degenerative conditions and spondylolisthesis, with symptoms of pain, radiculopathy, and/or myelopathy. Completion of fusion, ie, union, of an intended motion segment remains a desirable endpoint of spinal fusion, supported by the observations that pseudoarthrosis, ie, nonunion, following spinal fusion is correlated with poorer patient outcomes.

Iliac crest bone autograft is considered the gold standard for spinal fusion with excellent fusion rates and clinical outcomes. However, its clinical use has been restricted due to limited availability of harvestable bone, donor-site morbidity, increased surgical time, and the need for additional surgical staff and associated costs. As a result, there has been great interest in the search for bone graft substitutes to replace or reduce the amount of autograft, which will lower the risks associated with the harvesting procedure while still providing a favorable environment for a solid fusion. A wide range of synthetic bone grafts have been explored, including ceramics, bioactive glasses, and polymer-based compounds.

Although bioactive glasses have been used in spinal fusion for three decades, literature on them is dispersed over the wide array of bioactive glasses investigated and numerous small clinical studies. There is marked variability in these studies in terms of the patient population, indications, procedures performed, single- vs multi-level procedures, types of bioactive glasses, use of autografts, duration of follow-up (FU), and methods to determine fusion status. It is therefore difficult to draw conclusions on the optimal bioactive glass for a particular application. Nonetheless, the current literature suggests that bioactive glasses may be effective as bone graft extenders when combined with autograft to promote spinal fusion, yielding at least noninferior fusion rates when compared with autograft alone. There is limited data regarding the effectiveness of bone glasses as standalone bone graft substitutes or in interbody fusion procedures.

This single-center study to be conducted at the St. Maartenskliniek, the Netherlands, aims to address this knowledge gap. Since 2023, the hospital has consistently used Fibergraft Bioactive Glass (BG) Putty, a product from the FIBERGRAFTTM Bioactive Bone Graft Substitute family (Johnson \& Johnson MedTech), as standalone cage fillers for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF). This provides an opportunity for a case series to determine the fusion rate for bioactive glass as a standalone bone graft substitute in lumbar interbody fusion.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spine Degeneration Spine Disorder Spine Pain Spine Fusion Spine Fusion for Degenerative Spine Disease Nerve Root Compress;Lumbosac Spondylolisthesis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Questionnaires

Questionnaires

* Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
* Pain NRS lower back and (wors side) leg
* EQ-5D-3L

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Computer Tomography

One additional CT scan is performed for some patients

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults ≥ 18 years old
* Diagnosed with the following lumbar spine disorders: foraminal nerve root compression, isthmic spondylolisthesis, and short-segment (1-2 levels) deformity.
* Undergone primary surgery of ALIF or XLIF using titanium cages filled with standalone Fibergraft and with the following criteria fulfilled (ie, the index surgery):

* ALIF (up to 2 levels) as either standalone (ie, no posterior procedure) or as an anterior first procedure with posterior procedure as a second procedure.
* XLIF (up to 2 levels) as an anterior first procedure with posterior procedure as a second procedure.
* Consenting to have CT scans taken to allow assessment of fusion status at 12-24 months post index surgery

* This criterion is applicable to patients who have not undergone revision surgery.
* For patients who have undergone revision surgery due to any reason other than nonunion, which typically occurs within 1 year of the index surgery, this criterion is only applicable if it is possible to obtain the CT scan within 12-24 months of the index surgery. If no CT scan can be taken during this window, the patient does not need to undergo the CT scan; in such cases, the CT scan that has been taken as part of the standard of care before the revision surgery will be retrospectively retrieved to assess the fusion status at the time of the revision surgery.
* This criterion is not applicable to patients who underwent revision surgery due to nonunion, which typically occurs 1 year after the index surgery; these patients do not need to undergo the CT scan. In such cases, the CT scan that has been taken as part of the standard of care before the revision surgery will also be retrospectively retrieved to assess and grade the fusion status at the time of the revision surgery.
* Ability to provide informed consent according to the IRB/EC defined and approved procedures

Exclusion Criteria

* Revision surgery
* Standalone XLIF
* Posterior lumbar interbody fusion
* Diagnosis of fractures, malignancies, ankylosing spondylitis, or acute cauda equina syndrome
* Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease
* Body mass index \> 35kg/m2
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AO Innovation Translation Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St Mateenskliniek

Ubbergen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Marco Minoia

Role: CONTACT

+41 (0)79 612 09 67

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Rinse Meester, MD

Role: primary

+31 616076494

Robert Jan Kroeze, MD, PhD

Role: backup

+31 624927037

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Fibergraft

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Intercorporal Bone Graft Measurement Study
NCT05565456 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
CLUBE (UBE Stability / Dynamic Radio)
NCT06904326 RECRUITING NA
Natural Matrix Protein
NCT07217964 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION