RAMP Study: A Study Comparing Two Lumbar Fusion Procedures
NCT ID: NCT01716182
Last Updated: 2014-07-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-06-30
2014-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study Comparing Fusion Rates of Two Lumbar Fusion Procedures
NCT01972256
Comparison of Posterior Cellular Bonegraft Options for Single Level Lumbar Spinal Fusion
NCT07187362
Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of Health Economic Drivers and Complications for Two Lumbar Fusion Procedures
NCT02171169
Pilot Study of rhBMP-2/ACS/LT-CAGE® for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Degenerative Disc Disease
NCT01491373
Interbody Systems: Post Market Clinical Follow-up Study
NCT04911257
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The transacral lumbar interbody fusion (including 1L+ and 2L+) is a minimally invasive technique that uses a transacral approach to achieve fusion at the L5-S1 or L4-L5-S1 spinal levels. The transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is performed by using a posterior unilateral or bilateral incision in which the lumbar spine is accessed. Both study procedures are approved for use and conform to US regulatory requirements. The study employs these procedures and devices for uses that are consistent with their 510(k), legally cleared, labeling.
Study Design, Objective:
The study objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority between the transacral lumbar interbody fusion procedure and the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedure (TLIF) by meeting the primary and secondary study endpoints as listed below.
Study design, Endpoints:
Primary Endpoint:
Efficacy: Fusion of the targeted vertebral bodies (L4-L5 or L5-S1) by 24 months as determined by Central Radiographic Reviewer's interpretation of high resolution Computed Tomography (CT) scan.
Secondary Endpoints:
Safety: Incidence of major device-related adverse events and/or failures by 24 months, defined as those requiring revision surgery or a secondary operation, or events resulting in permanent disability or death.
Clinical Effectiveness: A 20% decrease in back pain compared to baseline by 24 months as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score.
Clinical Effectiveness: A 20% decrease in disability compared to baseline by 24 months as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
Study Design, Enrollment and Analyses:
Approximately 200 subjects will be enrolled in this study and will receive one of two study treatments in the study. The enrollment period is expected to last approximately 18 months, with a 24 month follow up period. Approximately 15-20 sites will participate, and Investigators must be proficient in both of the lumbar fusion procedures.
Analyses:
Eight evaluations: Pre-Operative, Operative, Discharge, and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 Months.
Safety and efficacy analyses will be performed at all follow-up points during the study as well as a final analysis when all subjects have completed the study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
transacral lumbar interbody fusion procedure
No interventions assigned to this group
transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedure (TLIF)
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The subject has a diagnosis of one or more of the following conditions at the L4-L5-S1 or L5-S1 levels:
* Spinal stenosis;
* Spondylolisthesis;
* Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) defined as back pain and/or radicular pain with degeneration of the disc as confirmed by history, physical examination and radiographic studies, either by CT, MRI, plain film, myelography, or discography;
* Adult 18 years of age or older;
* The subject has undergone at least 6 consecutive months of Conservative Care Therapy(ies);
* The subject is able and willing to give written informed consent and to comply with the requirements of this study protocol.
Exclusion Criteria
* Bowel disease (e.g. Crohn's, ulcerative colitis);
* Severe scoliosis (curves \> 60°);
* Sacral agenesis;
* Spondylolisthesis greater than Grade 1 at the L4-L5-S1 levels, or greater than Grade 2 at the L5-S1 level;
* Spinal tumor (or history of sacral tumor);
* History of fracture at L4, L5 and/or S1 vertebral bodies;
* The subject has undergone a prior fusion procedure of the lumbar spine;
* Osteoporosis; or, if the subject is at high risk for development of osteoporosis, further screening to be conducted at Investigator's discretion;
* Per the Investigator, body weight is exclusionary only if concomitant medical issues are present that preclude the subject from being a candidate for spinal surgery; The subject is a current cigarette smoker;
* For women of childbearing potential, pregnancy at the time of enrollment, or planning to become pregnant during the course of the study;
* The subject has a history of substance abuse (illegal drugs, prescription drugs, or alcohol) that, in the Investigator's opinion, may interfere with protocol assessments and/or the subject's ability to comply with the protocol;
* Per the Investigator, the subject is in poor general health or undergoing any concurrent disease process that would place the subject in excessive risk to surgery (e.g. significant circulatory problems, cardiac disease, history of bowel surgery);
* The subject is participating in another spine study, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could skew results;
* The subject is involved in litigation related to their back condition;
* The subject is contraindicated to receive either study procedure;
* The subject is contraindicated to receive bilateral pedicle screws;
* The subject has a history of allergy to any component of the devices or biologic material to be implanted in either procedure;
* The subject is a prisoner, transient, or an illegal alien.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Baxano Surgical, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Hart, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Joseph Heritage Healthcare
Fullerton, California, United States
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Indiana Spine Group
Carmel, Indiana, United States
Bone and Joint Clinic of Baton Rouge
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
LSU Health Sciences Center, Department of Neurosurgery
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
UMass Medical Center, Department of Neurosurgery
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Cary Orthopaedic Spine Specialists
Cary, North Carolina, United States
Mayfield Clinic/University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
University Hospitals Case Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Brazos Spine
College Station, Texas, United States
Danville Orthopedic Clinic, Inc.
Danville, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PR-0018
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.