Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of Health Economic Drivers and Complications for Two Lumbar Fusion Procedures
NCT ID: NCT02171169
Last Updated: 2014-09-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-06-30
2015-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study Comparing Fusion Rates of Two Lumbar Fusion Procedures
NCT01972256
RAMP Study: A Study Comparing Two Lumbar Fusion Procedures
NCT01716182
Percutaneous Trans-facet Screw Fixation Under CT-scan Guidance for Remaining Symptoms at a Distance of Previous Spinal Surgery
NCT05525052
Evaluate Effectiveness of the Biomet Lumbar Spinal Fusion System
NCT00758719
Cost Effectiveness and Clinical Utility of Cell Saver Use for Two to Three Level Lumbar Fusions
NCT01453309
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study objective is to demonstrate via retrospective data review the relative value of two lumbar fusion procedures: transsacral lumbar interbody fusion and the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion when used in conjunction with bilateral supplemental screw fixation as an adjunct to fusion. Subject candidates are those who had required fusion at L5-S1 where this was the only lumbar level treated for spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, or degenerative disc disease (DDD).
Consecutive subjects who were treated with the transsacral lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedure at least 1 year (- 2 months) prior to the date the data is collected will be evaluated.
Study Design, Endpoints:
Primary Endpoint:
Safety: Incidence of reported adverse events, including those requiring medical intervention, by 3 months post-operative.
Secondary Endpoints:
Health Economic: Operative measures, including the direct and surrogate measurement of estimated blood loss, anesthesia time, transfusions, length of surgery and time to hospital discharge, as applicable.
Health Economic: Comparative hospital data (from time of admission through time of discharge)
Clinical Effectiveness: A decrease in back pain compared to baseline at 3 months (+/-2 weeks) as measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Clinical Effectiveness: A decrease in disability compared to baseline at 3 months (+/-2 weeks) as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
Study Design, Enrollment:
Approximately 200 subjects will be enrolled in this study, 100 subjects who have been treated with transsacral lumbar interbody fusion and 100 subjects who have been treated with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Study Design, Analyses:
The retrospective clinical evaluation will collect and compare results for the procedure transsacral lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as defined by the primary and secondary endpoints.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Transsacral lumbar interbody fusion
No interventions assigned to this group
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male or Female subject that had previously received transsacral single-level procedure when used in conjunction with bilateral pedicle screw fixation or TLIF single-level procedure with bilateral supplemental screw fixation (e.g. pedicle screws, anterior devices with screw anchoring, anterior lumber plates) as an adjunct to fusion at L5-S1 to treat spinal stenosis, spondylolithesis or degenerative disc disease (DDD)
* Subject that was treated no less than 1 year (-2 months) prior to this evaluation with a transsacral or TLIF procedure by participating surgeons
Exclusion Criteria
* Subject had extraspinal cause of back pain or sciatica at the time of the index procedure
* Severe scoliosis in the lumbar region
* Subject was or is currently involved in active litigation
* Subject that had a diagnosis and received a transsacral or TLIF procedure at L5-S1 levels and did not require treatment at any other lumbar levels at the time of surgery.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Baxano Surgical, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peter Whang, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Yale University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Joseph Heritage Healthcare
Fullerton, California, United States
Michigan Spine Institute
Waterford, Michigan, United States
University Hospitals Case Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PR-07875
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.