Cost Effectiveness and Efficacy of Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty Trial
NCT ID: NCT00279877
Last Updated: 2016-08-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
112 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-05-31
2011-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Vertebroplasty for the Treatment of Fractures Due to Osteoporosis
NCT00068822
Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Vs. Sham for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Focusing on Pain and Economy.
NCT06141187
Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Versus Conservative Treatment of Pain
NCT00203554
Vertebral Augmentation With Kyphoplasty vs Nonsurgical Mgmt for Vertebral Body Compression Fractures
NCT01175278
Unipedicular vs. Bipedicular Kyphoplasty for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
NCT01383616
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
vertebroplasty
vertebroplasty
Kyphoplasty
kyphoplasty
kyphoplasty
kyphoplasty
Kyphoplasty
kyphoplasty
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Kyphoplasty
kyphoplasty
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Compression fracture (T4-L5)within previous 12 mo.
* Pain from compression fracture
* No malignant tumor
* No back surgery
50 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cardinal Health
INDUSTRY
ArthroCare Corporation
OTHER
Cook Group Incorporated
INDUSTRY
University of Virginia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Avery Evans, MD
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Avery Evans, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Virginia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Evans AJ, Kip KE, Brinjikji W, Layton KF, Jensen ML, Gaughen JR, Kallmes DF. Randomized controlled trial of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Jul;8(7):756-63. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011811. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
12031
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.