Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
114 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-11-19
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study is being done to compare Adherus AutoSpray and Adherus AutoSpray ET Dural Sealant to DuraSeal Exact Spinal Sealant, which has already received Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in spinal procedures.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety and Effectiveness of the Adherus Dural Sealant System When Used as a Dural Sealant in Cranial Procedures
NCT01158378
Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Spinal Sealant
NCT00594035
DuraSeal Exact Spine Sealant System Post-Approval Study
NCT01410864
Use of Spinal Sealant System During Spinal Surgery
NCT00458354
Duraplasty for Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
NCT07280351
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Subjects who are undergoing spinal surgery, consent to participate in this trial and experience a durotomy will be considered for study enrollment. Following a two-tiered inclusion/exclusion consideration, subjects will be randomized intraoperatively using a 1:1 randomization ratio. Up to 90 subjects will be randomized to treatment with either Adherus Dural Sealant or DuraSeal Exact with at least 50% of subjects undergoing procedures at lumbar or lumbosacral levels. Up to 30 investigational sites within the United States will participate in this trial.
A primary composite endpoint evaluating safety and effectiveness will be measured within a 90-day required follow-up period post-procedure. Subjects will be followed at discharge or between postoperative days (POD) 1-4 from the index procedure (whichever occurs first) and at 30 days and 90 days post-index procedure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Adherus Dural Sealant System
Device: Adherus Dural Sealant, In situ polymerizing sealant
Adherus Dural Sealant System
Adherus Dural Sealant, In situ polymerizing sealant
DuraSeal Exact Dural Sealant System
Device: DuraSeal Exact (P080013b)
DuraSeal Exact Dural Sealant System
DuraSeal Exact (P080013b)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Adherus Dural Sealant System
Adherus Dural Sealant, In situ polymerizing sealant
DuraSeal Exact Dural Sealant System
DuraSeal Exact (P080013b)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subject is scheduled for an elective spinal procedure that will require a planned durotomy.
3. Subject requires a procedure involving a Class I/clean wound (uninfected surgical wound in which no inflammation is encountered).
4. Subject is able and willing to provide informed consent and HIPAA authorization.
5. Subject is able and willing to meet all study requirements, including attending all post-index procedure assessment visits and radiological tests.
6. Subject has durotomy edges that can be re-approximated using the investigator's standard methods of dural repair.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subject has a pre-existing external lumbar CSF drain or internal CSF shunt.
3. Subject has experienced previous CSF leak (secondary to trauma, neoplasm, surgery, or other etiology).
4. Subject is undergoing a Chiari malformation procedure.
5. Subject has undergone a previous spinal procedure in the same anatomical location.
6. Subject has had radiation treatment to the surgical site, or standard fractionated radiation therapy is planned within ten days post indexprocedure.
7. Subject has spinal metallic implants that may cause significant imaging artifact on the MRI evaluation of the spine.
8. Subject has metallic implant(s) that are not MRI compatible, e.g., cochlear implant, neurostimulator, stent, surgical clip, cardiac pacemakers, or other non-MRI compatible implants, or an elective implant of such devices is planned during the course of the study. Note: mercury amalgam dental fillings or similar metallic dental prostheses are not an exclusion criterion.
9. Subject has a known malignancy or another condition with anticipated survival shorter than six months.
10. Subject has undergone chemotherapy treatment, excluding hormonal therapy, within three weeks prior to the planned index procedure, or chemotherapy treatment is planned within two weeks after the index procedure is performed.
11. Subject has been treated with chronic steroid therapy (defined as regular (daily) administration of steroid agent(s) for ≥ 8 weeks) unless discontinued greater than four weeks prior to the planned index procedure. Note: standard acute perioperative steroids are permitted; administration of steroid agents for \< 8 weeks duration prior to the planned index procedure is permitted.
12. Subject has received warfarin, heparin, other anticoagulant agents, aspirin or non steroid anti-inflammatory agents on a daily basis and pre-surgical, standard of care drug wash-out did not occur.
13. Subject has a compromised immune system or autoimmune disease or is on chronic immunosuppressant agents at baseline.
14. Subject has a systemic infection or evidence of any infection near planned operative site.
15. Subject has a serum creatinine level \> 2.0 mg/dL.
16. Subject has a serum total bilirubin \> 2.5 mg/dL at baseline.
17. Subject has uncontrolled diabetes as evidenced by an HbA1c \> 7% prior to surgery.
18. Subject has a known allergy to FD\&C Blue #1 and/or FD\&C Yellow #5 or any of the constituents of the dural sealants.
19. Subject is pregnant, breast-feeding, or intends to become pregnant during the course of the study.
20. Subject is participating in a clinical trial of another investigational drug or device and has not completed the required follow-up period.
21. Subject has an incidental finding that meets any pre-operative exclusion criterion listed above.
22. Subject's dural defect cannot be closed with suture and/or duraplasty material.
23. Subject has a gap \> 2 mm present between dural edges, or between the edge of dura and duraplasty material, based on visual estimate by surgeon before application of the surgical sealant.
24. Subject had undergone laminoplasty decompression.
25. Subject had undergone a syringomyelia procedure where the shunt is not placed in the subarachnoid position.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fortrea
INDUSTRY
Stryker Craniomaxillofacial
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
City of Hope National Medical Center
Duarte, California, United States
University of California Davis Health
Sacramento, California, United States
Stanford University
Stanford, California, United States
Mayo Clinic (FL)
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Houston Methodist Research Institute
Houston, Texas, United States
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Carilion Clinic
Roanoke, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HBMT-US-2019-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.