CEM-Plate and CEM-Cage First-In-Human Use Efficacy Study
NCT ID: NCT04883411
Last Updated: 2025-04-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-07
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cervical I/F Cage for Anterior Cervical Fusion
NCT00215293
Comparison of Artificial Disc Implants in Cervical Disc Arthroplasty
NCT05701059
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Surgical Trial
NCT02076113
Cellentra Viable Cell Bone Matrix (VCBM) Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Outcomes Study (VCBM/MaxAn)
NCT02182843
M6-C Artificial Cervical Disc Two-Level IDE Pivotal Study
NCT04982835
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study consists of a screening period, surgical procedure, and 6 post-operative visits. At each indicated visit, quality of life scales and adverse events will be collected. In addition, at 4 weeks post-operatively, patients will undergo static lateral cervical plain x rays to assess implant positioning and integrity. At 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months, patients will undergo flexion/extension and neutral lateral plain radiographs to assess overall success and fusion.
The study has co-primary endpoints for efficacy (fusion) and overall success where overall success is defined as fusion, device implanted as intended, no serious adverse events related to the surgical procedure, no device-related serious adverse events, no subsequent surgical interventions at the index levels, and absence of clinically significant device malfunctions. Fusion data will be compared to benchmark data (Davis et al, 2013, control arm of the 2-level Mobi-C IDE study).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment
Two-Level ACDF with CEM-Plate Anterior Cervical Plating System and CEM-Cage Cervical Interbody System.
CEM-Plate Anterior Cervical Plating System and CEM-Cage Cervical Interbody System
Two-Level ACDF with CEM-Plate Anterior Cervical Plating System and CEM-Cage Cervical Interbody System
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CEM-Plate Anterior Cervical Plating System and CEM-Cage Cervical Interbody System
Two-Level ACDF with CEM-Plate Anterior Cervical Plating System and CEM-Cage Cervical Interbody System
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Documented diagnosis of cervical spine radiculopathy or myelopathy.
3. Symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease at 2 contiguous levels between C2 through T1.
4. Baseline NDI score ≥30 and/or baseline mJOA score ≤16.
5. Pathology at the level to be treated correlating to the primary symptoms confirmed by imaging (computed tomography (CT), CT myelography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or plain radiography).
6. Unresponsive to non-operative, conservative treatment for at least 6 weeks from symptom onset or presence of progressive cervical myelopathy or signs of nerve root/spinal cord compression despite continued non-operative treatment.
7. Ability to speak, read, and understand the IRB approved Informed Consent document.
8. Willingness to give informed consent for participation in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Fewer than 2 or more than 2 vertebral levels requiring treatment.
3. Anatomy that is non-conducive to receiving investigational device.
4. More than one immobile vertebral level between C-1 to C-7 from any cause, including but not limited to congenital abnormalities and osteoarthritic "spontaneous" fusions.
5. Known diagnosis of osteoporosis, current pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis or bone density which in the medical opinion of the surgeon precludes operation or contraindicates instrumentation.
6. Paget disease, osteomalacia, or any other metabolic bone disease other than osteoporosis.
7. Active malignancy that includes a history of any invasive malignancy (except nonmelanoma skin cancer), unless previously treated with curative intent and with no clinical signs or symptoms of the malignancy for \> 5 years.
8. Severe cervical instability based on radiographic exam (whereby an anterior and posterior reconstructive procedure is indicated).
9. Decompression requiring corpectomy at one or more levels.
10. Active systemic infection or an infection localized to the site of the proposed implantation.
11. Open wounds.
12. Signs of local inflammation.
13. Fever.
14. Any diseases or conditions that would preclude accurate clinical evaluation.
15. Daily, high-dose oral and/or inhaled steroids or a history of chronic use of high-dose steroids.
16. BMI \> 40.
17. Use of any other investigational drug or medical device within 30 days prior to surgery.
18. Smoking more than 1 pack of cigarettes/day.
19. Mental illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude patient's ability to participate in the study.
20. Current or recent history of substance abuse (alcoholism and/or narcotic addiction) requiring intervention.
21. Litigation relating to spinal injury/worker's compensation.
22. Reported to have a history of or anticipated treatment for active systemic infection, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or Hepatitis C.
23. Previous trauma to the C2 to T1 levels resulting in significant bony or disco-ligamentous cervical spine injury.
24. Axial neck pain in the absence of other symptoms of radiculopathy or myeloradiculopathy or myelopathy justifying the need for surgical intervention.
25. Pregnancy.
26. Any medical or surgical condition which would preclude the potential benefit of spinal implant surgery, such as the elevation of sedimentation rate unexplained by other diseases, elevation of white blood count (WBC), or a marked left shift in the WBC differential count.
27. Suspected or documented metal allergy or intolerance.
28. Inadequate tissue coverage over the operative site or where there is inadequate bone stock, bone quality, or anatomical definition.
29. Any patient unwilling to cooperate with the post-operative instructions.
30. Any time implant utilization would interfere with anatomical structures or expected physiological performance.
22 Years
79 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Albany Medical College
OTHER
The Cleveland Clinic
OTHER
IGEA
INDUSTRY
ReVivo Medical, Corp.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John German, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Albany Medical College
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IGEA
Union, New Jersey, United States
Albany Medical College
Albany, New York, United States
University at Buffalo Neurosurgery
Williamsville, New York, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Adam Lipson, MD
Role: primary
John Pollina, MD
Role: primary
Dominic Pelle, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RM-21-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.