Post-Market, Long-Term Follow Up of Mobi-C® Cervical Disc for One and Two Level Treatment of Cervical Disc Disease
NCT ID: NCT03077516
Last Updated: 2019-12-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
216 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-11-30
2019-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
LDR Spine USA Mobi-C(R) Cervical Disc Prosthesis IDE
NCT00389597
2-level Cervical Disc Replacement Comparing Prodisc C SK & Vivo to Mobi-C
NCT04012996
Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of Primary Hybrid Construct of Mobi-C and ACDF in the Treatment of Two-level Symptomatic Degenerative Disc Disease in the Cervical Spine.
NCT06485206
Retrospective/Prospective Data Collection on the LDR ROIC Interbody Fusion Device With VerteBRIDGE Plating
NCT02104167
M6-C Post Approval Study (PAS)
NCT04122248
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
As non-inferiority (1-level) and superiority (2-level) have been well established through 7 years, the design of this study will focus on the long-term outcomes of a cohort of the Mobi-C arm of the study and evaluate the durability of outcomes at 10 years. Study sites invited to participate will be those that enrolled at least 10 subjects, and also had the highest retention rates at 7 years (≥70%). All subjects at these sites will be contacted to participate in an additional 10 year follow up visit. It is estimated that up to 250 subjects will be enrolled at 9-12 study sites.
Certain endpoints are better assessed in comparison to the control ACDF arm, such as adjacent segment degeneration and subsequent surgery. This study has been amended to include a subset of sites that will also enroll control subjects. Up to 3 sites and 50 subjects will be included in this control cohort.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mobi-C
Prior recipient of Mobi-C Disc in IDE/Post Approval Study
Mobi-C
Device for cervical intervertebral disc replacement at one or two contiguous levels
ACDF
Prior control subject in IDE/Post Approval Study
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mobi-C
Device for cervical intervertebral disc replacement at one or two contiguous levels
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Written informed consent provided by subject or subject's legally authorized representative
Exclusion Criteria
2. Documented non-compliance (including unwillingness to return to the site for follow-up visits)
3. Reported pregnancy at time of enrollment, or with plans to become pregnant prior to completing study X-Rays
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
LDR Spine USA
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Orange County Neurosurgical Associates
Laguna Hills, California, United States
Desert Orthopedic Center
Rancho Mirage, California, United States
UC Davis Spine Center
Sacramento, California, United States
The Spine Institute
Santa Monica, California, United States
Orthopedics Northeast
Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
Spine Institute of Louisiana
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Texas Back Institute
Plano, Texas, United States
Texas Spine and Joint Hospital
Tyler, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Radcliff K, Coric D, Albert T. Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Aug;25(2):213-24. doi: 10.3171/2015.12.SPINE15824. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
Hisey MS, Zigler JE, Jackson R, Nunley PD, Bae HW, Kim KD, Ohnmeiss DD. Prospective, Randomized Comparison of One-level Mobi-C Cervical Total Disc Replacement vs. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Results at 5-year Follow-up. Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Feb 26;10:10. doi: 10.14444/3010. eCollection 2016.
Jackson RJ, Davis RJ, Hoffman GA, Bae HW, Hisey MS, Kim KD, Gaede SE, Nunley PD. Subsequent surgery rates after cervical total disc replacement using a Mobi-C Cervical Disc Prosthesis versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomized clinical trial with 5-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 May;24(5):734-45. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.SPINE15219. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
Ament JD, Yang Z, Nunley P, Stone MB, Lee D, Kim KD. Cost Utility Analysis of the Cervical Artificial Disc vs Fusion for the Treatment of 2-Level Symptomatic Degenerative Disc Disease: 5-Year Follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2016 Jul;79(1):135-45. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001208.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MC-100
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.