Dynamic Stabilization for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System
NCT ID: NCT00529997
Last Updated: 2010-08-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
480 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-02-28
2010-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study hypothesis criteria for demonstrating safety and efficacy requires scientific evidence that patients classified as satisfying the primary study endpoint post device implantation is at least as good for Stabilimax NZ® recipients as that for patients undergoing fusion with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation at the 24 month followup assessment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Clinical Study of the Dynesys(R) Spinal System
NCT00759057
Interbody Systems: Post Market Clinical Follow-up Study
NCT04911257
DIAM™ Spinal Stabilization System vs. Decompression, Formerly vs. Posterolateral Fusion
NCT00627497
Indirect vs. Direct Decompression for Treatment of Central Stenosis: RCT
NCT04708977
Stabilimax Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Clinical Investigation Patient Followup Study
NCT01485289
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The pain can be from many sources. For patients being enrolled into this study the pain has been diagnosed to be primarily as a result of a condition called spinal stenosis. The current standard of care for the treatment of moderate to severe spinal stenosis is a surgical procedure that relieves the pressure on the spinal cord and nerves is called decompression surgery. The surgeon removes the tissue and bone that are causing the narrowing thus relieving the pinching of the spinal cord and nerve roots. After surgery, the patient may have a spine that is too unstable. In other words the muscles and ligaments around the spine have to work too hard to maintain normal posture and to control movement. For many years those patients with unstable backs have received fusion therapy. Fusion is the development of bone between the vertebra to stabilize the spine and prevent motion. This is done by inserting a bone graft around the vertebra being treated and placing a rigid brace called a fusion device to prevent movement. Eventually bone will form between the vertebra and the spine will become "fused".
In this study we will be conducting research to evaluate a new, investigative medical device that is designed to brace and support the spine just like fusion but without fusing in the patient's spine. Devices that do this are called "motion preserving" or "dynamic stabilizing" spinal devices. The investigational device that is being evaluated in this study is called the Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spinal Stabilization System. The Stabilimax NZ® is inserted and fixed to the vertebra by means of pedicle screws in exactly the same way a fusion device is inserted and attached. The only difference is that for the Stabilimax NZ® no bone graft will be placed around or between the vertebra to promote bone growth for fusion. Patients in the study will receive either the Stabilimax NZ® or will receive a fusion procedure. The study is a randomized controlled clinical trial using a 2:1 investigational:control randomization scheme. The study will enroll 480 patients at approximately 20 investigational sites across the United States.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Posterior Dynamic Stabilization with the Stabilimax NZ
Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System
Surgical Implantation
2
Posteriolateral instrumented fusion
Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System
Surgical Implantation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System
Surgical Implantation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Degenerative spinal stenosis of the lumbar spine, central, lateral recess, or foraminal;
* Evidence of the cal sac and/or cauda equina compression, nerve root impingement, hypertrophic facets with canal encroachment, with or without spondylolisthesis, if present, no more than grade 1
General:
* The greater of the patients right and left VAS leg pain score is ≥ 40 mm on a 100 mm scale;
* Zurich Claudication Questionnaire Symptom Severity score greater than 2 on a scale of 1-5;
* Zurich Claudication Questionnaire Physical Function score greater than or equal to 2 on a scale of 1-4;
* Intermittent neurogenic claudication
* At least six months of non-surgical management.
* Skeletally mature patients at least 21 years of age;
* Willing to provide written consent for participation and a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act authorization;
* Willing to undergo all study procedures including physical therapy and adhere to the follow-up schedule; and
* No additional surgical treatment is required outside the investigational or control at the time of surgery.
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior surgery at any lumbar level including the level being treated except for: Lamino/Foraminotomy, Microdiscectomy, IDET, and Percutaneous Discectomy.
* Prior surgery at any lumbar level within one year of enrollment;
* No more than one prior surgery at any lumbar level;
* Previous acute trauma at the treated level within two years of enrollment;
* Primary and predominate diagnosis of discogenic back pain, e.g. torn disc, herniated disc inflamed or irritated disc, or other disc pathology;
* Symptomatic cervical and/or thoracic neurological compromise;
* Significant peripheral neuropathy or acute denervation secondary to radiculopathy, caused by conditions other than spinal stenosis;
* Other neurological pathology that could confound study results;
* Cauda Equina Syndrome;
* Contraindicated for MRI;
* Morbid obesity (BMI \> 40);
* Peripheral vascular disease requiring intervention (≥ 50% stenosis of vessel);
* Active systemic or surgical site infection;
* Any significant medical conditions that would represent a significant increase in surgical risk or interfere with normal healing;
* History of psychosocial disorders that could prevent accurate completion of self reporting assessment scales
* Women who are pregnant, lactating or anticipate becoming pregnant within 24 months post-surgery;
* Insulin dependent diabetes mellitus;
* Immunocompromised such as but not limited to Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome , genetic deficiencies of the complement system, Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Disease, Thymic Hypoplasia;
* Receiving immunosuppressive therapy
* Receiving long-term steroid therapy. Autoimmune disease;
* Active hepatitis;
* Malignancy of any type within the last five years;
* Previous known allergy to the materials contained in the Stabilimax NZ™ device including nickel, cobalt, chromium, molybdenum, iron, titanium, or Teflon™;
* Participation in another clinical study within four weeks of enrollment, or;
* Receiving Worker's Compensation or is involved in active litigation relating to his/her spinal condition;
* Patients who are prisoners.
Radiographic:
* Gross instability, defined as greater than 3 mm translational motion on flexion/extension studies;
* Degenerative spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis higher than grade 1
* Degenerative scoliosis \> 10° at any level(s) in lumbar spine
* Lateral listhesis on A-P X Ray
* Spondylolysis at any level in lumbar spine
* Isthmic Spondylolisthesis at any level in lumbar spine
* Spondylolisthesis at more than one lumbar level;
* DEXA score equal to or below -2.5 T;
* Pathological vertebral fracture;
* Metastases to the spinal vertebra; Paget's disease of bone; Osteomalacia; Pars defect or facet fracture;
* Facet arthropathy at the level(s) to be treated is less than grade 2 and greater than grade 3 according to the Fujiwara scale;
* More than moderate disc degeneration defined as: \> 66% loss of disc height compared to the normal, superior adjacent level; and/or moderate to Severe Osteophyte formation;
* Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis;
* Estimated interpedicular distance of less than 30 mm.
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Applied Spine Technologies
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Applied Spine Technologies, Inc.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Richard Guyer, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Texas Back Institute
David Musante, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Triangle Orthopedics Associates
Neel Anand, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cedars Sinai Medical Center Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Surgical Specialty Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Cedars Sinai Medical Center Hospital
Los Angeles, California, United States
Tri-City Medical Center
Oceanside, California, United States
Littleton Adventist Hospital
Littleton, Colorado, United States
New Britain General Hospital
New Britain, Connecticut, United States
Morton Plant Mease
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Largo Medical Center
Largo, Florida, United States
University Community Hospital at Carrolwood
Tampa, Florida, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Upstate Medical Center
Syracuse, New York, United States
North Carolina Specialty Hospital
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Blanchard Valley Hospital
Findlay, Ohio, United States
Sacred Heart Medical Center
Eugene, Oregon, United States
Lehigh Valley Hospital
Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States
Wellmont Bristol Regional Medical Center
Bristol, Tennessee, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Presbyterian Plano Center for Diagnostics & Surgery
Plano, Texas, United States
University of Utah Hospital
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
DePaul Medical Center
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AST-A-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
NCT00479544
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: nct_alias
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.