Dynamic Stabilization for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System

NCT ID: NCT00529997

Last Updated: 2010-08-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

480 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-02-28

Study Completion Date

2010-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this trial is to assess whether the Stabilimax NZ® is at least as safe and effective as the control therapy of fusion in patients receiving decompression surgery for the treatment of clinically symptomatic spinal stenosis at one contiguous vertebral levels from L1-S1. Safety and effectiveness will be assessed by means of primary study endpoints which address improvements in pain and function in the absence of major device related complications.

The study hypothesis criteria for demonstrating safety and efficacy requires scientific evidence that patients classified as satisfying the primary study endpoint post device implantation is at least as good for Stabilimax NZ® recipients as that for patients undergoing fusion with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation at the 24 month followup assessment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Degenerative spine disease is a normal part of the aging process. This degeneration can sometimes cause significant pain and limit normal movement.

The pain can be from many sources. For patients being enrolled into this study the pain has been diagnosed to be primarily as a result of a condition called spinal stenosis. The current standard of care for the treatment of moderate to severe spinal stenosis is a surgical procedure that relieves the pressure on the spinal cord and nerves is called decompression surgery. The surgeon removes the tissue and bone that are causing the narrowing thus relieving the pinching of the spinal cord and nerve roots. After surgery, the patient may have a spine that is too unstable. In other words the muscles and ligaments around the spine have to work too hard to maintain normal posture and to control movement. For many years those patients with unstable backs have received fusion therapy. Fusion is the development of bone between the vertebra to stabilize the spine and prevent motion. This is done by inserting a bone graft around the vertebra being treated and placing a rigid brace called a fusion device to prevent movement. Eventually bone will form between the vertebra and the spine will become "fused".

In this study we will be conducting research to evaluate a new, investigative medical device that is designed to brace and support the spine just like fusion but without fusing in the patient's spine. Devices that do this are called "motion preserving" or "dynamic stabilizing" spinal devices. The investigational device that is being evaluated in this study is called the Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spinal Stabilization System. The Stabilimax NZ® is inserted and fixed to the vertebra by means of pedicle screws in exactly the same way a fusion device is inserted and attached. The only difference is that for the Stabilimax NZ® no bone graft will be placed around or between the vertebra to promote bone growth for fusion. Patients in the study will receive either the Stabilimax NZ® or will receive a fusion procedure. The study is a randomized controlled clinical trial using a 2:1 investigational:control randomization scheme. The study will enroll 480 patients at approximately 20 investigational sites across the United States.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Posterior Dynamic Stabilization with the Stabilimax NZ

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Surgical Implantation

2

Posteriolateral instrumented fusion

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Surgical Implantation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System

Surgical Implantation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Radiographic:

* Degenerative spinal stenosis of the lumbar spine, central, lateral recess, or foraminal;
* Evidence of the cal sac and/or cauda equina compression, nerve root impingement, hypertrophic facets with canal encroachment, with or without spondylolisthesis, if present, no more than grade 1

General:

* The greater of the patients right and left VAS leg pain score is ≥ 40 mm on a 100 mm scale;
* Zurich Claudication Questionnaire Symptom Severity score greater than 2 on a scale of 1-5;
* Zurich Claudication Questionnaire Physical Function score greater than or equal to 2 on a scale of 1-4;
* Intermittent neurogenic claudication
* At least six months of non-surgical management.
* Skeletally mature patients at least 21 years of age;
* Willing to provide written consent for participation and a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act authorization;
* Willing to undergo all study procedures including physical therapy and adhere to the follow-up schedule; and
* No additional surgical treatment is required outside the investigational or control at the time of surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

Initial Screening:

* Prior surgery at any lumbar level including the level being treated except for: Lamino/Foraminotomy, Microdiscectomy, IDET, and Percutaneous Discectomy.
* Prior surgery at any lumbar level within one year of enrollment;
* No more than one prior surgery at any lumbar level;
* Previous acute trauma at the treated level within two years of enrollment;
* Primary and predominate diagnosis of discogenic back pain, e.g. torn disc, herniated disc inflamed or irritated disc, or other disc pathology;
* Symptomatic cervical and/or thoracic neurological compromise;
* Significant peripheral neuropathy or acute denervation secondary to radiculopathy, caused by conditions other than spinal stenosis;
* Other neurological pathology that could confound study results;
* Cauda Equina Syndrome;
* Contraindicated for MRI;
* Morbid obesity (BMI \> 40);
* Peripheral vascular disease requiring intervention (≥ 50% stenosis of vessel);
* Active systemic or surgical site infection;
* Any significant medical conditions that would represent a significant increase in surgical risk or interfere with normal healing;
* History of psychosocial disorders that could prevent accurate completion of self reporting assessment scales
* Women who are pregnant, lactating or anticipate becoming pregnant within 24 months post-surgery;
* Insulin dependent diabetes mellitus;
* Immunocompromised such as but not limited to Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome , genetic deficiencies of the complement system, Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Disease, Thymic Hypoplasia;
* Receiving immunosuppressive therapy
* Receiving long-term steroid therapy. Autoimmune disease;
* Active hepatitis;
* Malignancy of any type within the last five years;
* Previous known allergy to the materials contained in the Stabilimax NZ™ device including nickel, cobalt, chromium, molybdenum, iron, titanium, or Teflon™;
* Participation in another clinical study within four weeks of enrollment, or;
* Receiving Worker's Compensation or is involved in active litigation relating to his/her spinal condition;
* Patients who are prisoners.

Radiographic:

* Gross instability, defined as greater than 3 mm translational motion on flexion/extension studies;
* Degenerative spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis higher than grade 1
* Degenerative scoliosis \> 10° at any level(s) in lumbar spine
* Lateral listhesis on A-P X Ray
* Spondylolysis at any level in lumbar spine
* Isthmic Spondylolisthesis at any level in lumbar spine
* Spondylolisthesis at more than one lumbar level;
* DEXA score equal to or below -2.5 T;
* Pathological vertebral fracture;
* Metastases to the spinal vertebra; Paget's disease of bone; Osteomalacia; Pars defect or facet fracture;
* Facet arthropathy at the level(s) to be treated is less than grade 2 and greater than grade 3 according to the Fujiwara scale;
* More than moderate disc degeneration defined as: \> 66% loss of disc height compared to the normal, superior adjacent level; and/or moderate to Severe Osteophyte formation;
* Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis;
* Estimated interpedicular distance of less than 30 mm.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Applied Spine Technologies

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Applied Spine Technologies, Inc.

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richard Guyer, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Texas Back Institute

David Musante, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Triangle Orthopedics Associates

Neel Anand, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cedars Sinai Medical Center Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Surgical Specialty Hospital

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Cedars Sinai Medical Center Hospital

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Tri-City Medical Center

Oceanside, California, United States

Site Status

Littleton Adventist Hospital

Littleton, Colorado, United States

Site Status

New Britain General Hospital

New Britain, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Morton Plant Mease

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Largo Medical Center

Largo, Florida, United States

Site Status

University Community Hospital at Carrolwood

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Upstate Medical Center

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

North Carolina Specialty Hospital

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Blanchard Valley Hospital

Findlay, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Sacred Heart Medical Center

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Lehigh Valley Hospital

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Wellmont Bristol Regional Medical Center

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Presbyterian Plano Center for Diagnostics & Surgery

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Utah Hospital

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

DePaul Medical Center

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AST-A-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

NCT00479544

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: nct_alias

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Condition of Approval Study
NCT00517751 TERMINATED PHASE4