A Clinical Study of the Dynesys(R) Spinal System

NCT ID: NCT00759057

Last Updated: 2012-06-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

399 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-03-31

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This non-inferiority study will compare the clinical outcomes of subjects implanted with the Dynesys Spinal System versus the clinical outcomes of subjects implanted with an instrumented posterior lateral spinal fusion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this clinical study is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Dynesys Spinal System for patients requiring one or contiguous two-level posterior spinal stabilization of the lumbar, and/or sacral spine following decompression. The ability for this implant to maintain spinal alignment and non-fusion of spinal segments, while positively affecting clinical outcomes, will be assessed and compared to a posterior lateral spinal fusion (PLF) procedure using autogenous bone with a semi-rigid, polyaxial posterior spinal fixation system.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Degenerative Spondylolisthesis or Retrolisthesis Spinal Stenosis Stenosing Lesion.

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1 - Investigational

Dynesys Non-Fusion Spinal System

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Posterior Pedicle Screw System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Implantation of Posterior Pedicle Screw System

2 - Control

Silhouette Posterior Pedicle Screw System as an adjunct to Posterior Lateral Fusion with Autograft.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Posterior Pedicle Screw System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Implantation of Posterior Pedicle Screw System

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Posterior Pedicle Screw System

Implantation of Posterior Pedicle Screw System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients having degenerative spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis (up to Grade 1) AND/OR Patients having lateral or central spinal stenosis or other stenosing lesion as diagnosed by radiculopathic signs, neurogenic claudication or imaging studies;
* Candidate for single-level or contiguous two-level PLF between L1-S1;
* Patients have a predominate component of leg rather than back symptoms; symptoms include pain, muscle weakness, and/or sensation abnormality as evidenced by patient history and diagnostic studies.
* Patients may require decompression at the levels considered for treatment
* Pre-operative leg pain score greater than or equal to 40 mm on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS);
* Leg pain must be unresponsive to conservative (non-surgical) management for minimum of 3 months;
* Pre-operative Oswestry score greater than or equal to 30 indicating at least moderate disability;
* Skeletally mature individual between ages 20 and 80;
* Must be willing and able to comply with study requirements; including willing and able to sign a study-specific, IRB-approved informed consent form, complete necessary study paperwork and return for required follow-up visits.

Exclusion Criteria

* Primary diagnosis of discogenic back pain at affected levels as evidenced by a larger back than leg pain component. In the event of multi-level pathology a discogram should be considered;
* Patients with leg pain due to etiologies other than those listed above, such as trauma, peripheral vascular disease and neuropathy should be excluded;
* Degenerative scoliosis greater than 10 degrees at the affected motion segment;
* Supplemental interbody column support (e.g., bone graft, spacers or fusion cages) is planned at the affected level(s);
* Greater than Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the affected level(s);
* Radiculopathic signs from more than two contiguous or two noncontiguous vertebral body segment(s);
* Previous lumbar fusion attempt(s), previous total facetectomy or trauma at the affected level(s);
* Gross obesity defined as exceeding ideal weight by greater than 40% (measurement details are given in Appendix A);
* Active local or systemic infection;
* Advanced osteoporosis as evidenced by plain film radiographs or history of fractures and confirmed by DEXA scan to confirm adequate bone density;
* Receiving immunosuppressive or long-term steroid therapy;
* Active hepatitis (viral or serum) or HIV positive, renal failure, systemic lupus erythematosus, or any other significant medical conditions which would substantially increase the risk of surgery;
* Documented history of titanium alloy, PET or PCU allergy, or intolerance;
* Active malignancy or other significant medical comorbidities;
* Current chemical dependency or significant emotional and/or psychosocial disturbance that may impact treatment outcome or study participation as evidenced by three or more positive Waddell Signs;
* Pregnancy;
* Incarceration;
* Severe muscular, neural or vascular diseases that endanger the spinal column;
* Missing bone structures, due to severely deformed anatomy or congenital anomalies, which make good anchorage of the implant impossible;
* All concomitant diseases that can jeopardize the functioning and success of the patient;
* Vertebral fractures;
* Treatment of the thoracic and cervical spine;
* Severely deformed anatomy due to congenital anomalies;
* Paralysis
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zimmer Biomet

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Scottsdale Spine Center

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Northwest NeuroSpecialists

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, The Spine Institute

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Pacific Regional Neurosurgery

Modesto, California, United States

Site Status

Denver Spine Center

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Medical Faculty Associates - The George Washington University

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Orthopedic Care & Sports Medicine Center

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

Peachtree Orthopaedic Clinic

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Fort Wayne Orthopedic

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indiana University Neurosurgical

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Heartland Spine and Hand Center

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Spine Specialty Center (SSC)

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Baltimore Neurosurgical Associates, PA

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Orthopaedic Associates

Towson, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Sports Medicine North

Peabody, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Orthopedic Consultants, PA

Edina, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Manhattan Orthopaedics, PC

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

SUNY Upstate Medical University Dept of Orthopedic Surgery

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Triangle Orthopedic Associates

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Orthopaedic Spine Associates

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Dept. of Neurosurgery UPMC Presbyterian

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Abington Hospital

Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

SPINE

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

College Station Neurosurgery

College Station, Texas, United States

Site Status

Park Plaza Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

SpineMark CRO at TBI

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

G020291

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.