A Postmarket Surveillance Study of the Paradigm Spine Dynamic Stabilization System (DSS)
NCT ID: NCT01461005
Last Updated: 2020-02-19
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
1 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-09-30
2016-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dynesys Spinal System Post Market 522 Study
NCT01528072
A Clinical Study of the Dynesys(R) Spinal System
NCT00759057
Interbody Systems: Post Market Clinical Follow-up Study
NCT04911257
Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Dynamic Stabilization Versus Lumbar Fusion in Treatment of Multilevel Lumbar Disc Degeneration Disease
NCT02385695
Multi-Centre Post-Market Data Collection
NCT06413225
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dynamic Stabilization System
Dynamic Stabilization System (DSS) System
Dynamic Stabilization System (DSS)
Dynamic Stabilization System
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dynamic Stabilization System (DSS)
Dynamic Stabilization System
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient has degenerative spondylolisthesis (Grade 1-3) with objective evidence of neurologic impairment, kyphosis, and/or failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis) at index level.
* Capable and willing to comply with the requirements unique to the study, adhere to the post-operative treatment and management program, and return for required follow-up examinations.
* Surgeon has determined that DSS™ System is an appropriate treatment for the patient without regard to the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Any medical, mental or surgical condition precluding the potential benefit of spinal surgery or surgery in general.
* Acute or chronic systemic, spinal or localized infections.
* Active, severe systemic and metabolic diseases.
* Obesity defined as Body Mass Index \> 35.
* Subject is pregnant or interested in becoming pregnant in the next 36 months.
* Dependency on pharmaceutical drugs, drug abuse, or alcoholism.
* Lack of patient cooperation.
* Foreign body sensitivity to the implant material.
* Degenerative scoliosis greater than 25 degrees.
* Grade 4 degenerative spondylolisthesis (\>75% slip).
* Significant osteopenia A screening questionnaire for osteopenia, SCORE (Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation), will be used to screen patients who require a DEXA bone mineral density measurement. If DEXA is required\*, exclusion will be defined as a DEXA bone density measured T score of ≤ -1.0 (The World Health Organization definition of osteopenia).
* Soft tissue deficit not allowing wound closure.
* Congenital abnormalities, tumors or other conditions that would prevent secure component fixation that has the potential to decrease the useful life of the device.
* Inadequate pedicles or vertebral body geometry of the thoracic, lumbar and sacral vertebrae.
* Bony lumbar spinal stenosis not related to the primary degenerative spondylolisthesis indication.
* Pars defect.
* Clinically compromised vertebral bodies at affected level due to current or past trauma.
* Prisoner or ward of the state.
* Currently in litigation regarding a spinal condition.
* Known allergy to titanium, titanium alloys, CoCrMo, polyethylene or MR contrast agents.
* Is currently involved in a study of another investigational product for similar purpose.
21 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
MCRA
INDUSTRY
Paradigm Spine
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gitela Gandelman
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Paradigm Spine LLC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Dynamic Stabilization System
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.