Comparison of the Aspen Device Versus Pedicle Screws for Supplemental Posterior Fixation in Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT ID: NCT01549366
Last Updated: 2018-03-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
64 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-02-29
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of the Aspen Spinous Process System in Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF)
NCT01016314
Aspen Spinous Process Fixation System for Use in PLF in Patients With Spondylolisthesis
NCT01560273
Evaluation of Aspen Spinous Process Fixation System and PLIF Technique for the Treatment of Low Back Pain
NCT01918943
Titanium vs. PEEK Fusion Devices in 1 Level TLIF
NCT05691062
TLIF Osteo3 ZP Putty Study (Also Known as the TOP Fusion Study)
NCT05114135
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary hypothesis is that change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) of subjects in the study group (Aspen) will be non-inferior to the control group (pedicle screw instrumentation). The non-inferiority margin is pre-specified to be 10 ODI score points. If the non-inferiority is established, superiority of Aspen to the control will be tested.
The study will involve up to 25 investigational sites. Enrollment is expected to take approximately 24 months. Subjects will be followed for 2 years, with the anticipated duration of the study being approximately 4 years from start to finish.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Aspen Spinous Process Fixation Device
Subjects randomized to the Aspen study arm will have the Aspen device implanted as supplemental posterior fixation only and according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
Aspen Spinous Process Fixation Device
The Aspen device will be placed as posterior fixation to Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF) or Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF)
Pedicle Screws
Subjects randomized to the pedicle screw group will have polyaxial top loading pedicle screws implanted according to the standard procedures and practices at that institution. The procedure may be performed according to surgeon preference, including a traditional open, minimally invasive or percutaneous approach. Only pedicle screws cleared by FDA for this indication will be used in this study.
Pedicle Screws
Pedicle Screws will be placed as posterior fixation to Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF) or Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Aspen Spinous Process Fixation Device
The Aspen device will be placed as posterior fixation to Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF) or Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF)
Pedicle Screws
Pedicle Screws will be placed as posterior fixation to Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF) or Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for an elective single-level circumferential lumbar fusion by means of supplemental posterior fusion with fixation (allowing for the placement of ASPEN or pedicle screws) for an anterior or lateral interbody fusion
* Diagnosis of primary symptomatic Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) and/or spondylolisthesis confirmed with appropriate imaging studies and/or positive lumbar discography
* Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) v2.1 score \> 30%
* Failed at least 3 months of conservative care (non-surgical) OR has clinical signs of neurological deterioration
* Signed Informed Consent Form
Exclusion Criteria
* Spondylolisthesis Grade 3 or more
* Lytic spondylolisthesis
* Incompetent or missing posterior arch at the affected level (e.g. complete laminectomy, pars defect)
* Requires complete laminectomy at level of surgery
* Facet joints at implant level are absent or fractured
* Vertebral body compromise or acute fracture at implant level
* Body mass Index (BMI) ≥ 35
* Known allergy to titanium
* Osteoporosis: Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation (S.C.O.R.E.) \> 6 AND Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) T-score \< -2.5
* Paget's disease, osteomalacia, or any other metabolic bone disease
* Use of medications or any drug known to potentially interfere with bone/soft tissue healing (e.g. chronic systemic steroids)
* Planned use of additional segmental fixation (eg. facet screws)
* Planned use of Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) for posterolateral fusion\*
* Unlikely to comply with the follow-up evaluation schedule
* In the opinion of the Investigator, Subject has history of chemical substance dependency or significant psychosocial disturbance that may impact the outcome or study participation
* Active participation in a clinical trial of another drug or device
* Active systemic infection or any other health condition that would preclude surgery
* History of invasive malignancy, except if the subject has received treatment and displayed no clinical signs and symptoms for at least five years
* Subject is a prisoner
* Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the length of study participation
* Involvement in active litigation related to back problems at the time of screening
* Direct involvement in the execution of this protocol
* Pre-existing conditions that could interfere with the evaluation of outcome measures (e.g. musculoskeletal, neuromuscular, etc.)
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Zimmer Biomet
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Patel
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Colorado, Denver
Cappuccino
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Buffalo Spine Surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clint Hill
Paducah, Kentucky, United States
Buffalo Spine Surgery
Lockport, New York, United States
Andy Kranenburg
Medford, Oregon, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ASP-11-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.