Retro Comparison of Subsidence Following Interbody Devices in Lumbar Spine
NCT ID: NCT05536453
Last Updated: 2025-10-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
465 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-08-16
2025-07-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients treated with IBFD's (both EXP and STC) according to their intended use and cleared labeling
1. EXP IBFD's that expand in width and height demonstrate reduced occurrence of subsidence post-operatively when compared to EXP IBFD's that expand in height only and STC IBFD's.
2. EXP IBFD's that are comprised of multi-material composition with Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) endplate contacting surfaces demonstrate reduced occurrence of subsidence on post-operative radiographs when compared to EXP and STC IBFD's that are primarily comprised of Ti with Ti endplate contacting surfaces.
3. achieve radiographic fusion at a rate consistent with the state-of-the-art
4. achieve significant improvements in pain and function compared to baseline
5. experience adverse events at a frequency comparable to reported rates for TLIF or PLIF surgery
6. not demonstrate any intraoperative complications during the implant process
7. operative approach does not correlate with increased rates of subsidence
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Outcome and Fusion Rate of 3D Printed Interbody Fusion Cages and Titanium Coated PEEK Cages
NCT05237908
Interbody Systems: Post Market Clinical Follow-up Study
NCT04911257
Spineology Clinical Outcomes Trial: An IDE Investigation
NCT02347410
Lumbar Interbody Implant Study
NCT04418830
A Pivotal Study of rhBMP-2/ACS/INTER FIX™ Device for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Degenerative Disc Disease
NCT01491464
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices
Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion device placed to treat symptoms associated with degenerative disc disease
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Was at least 18 years of age and skeletally mature at the time of surgery
2. Had clinical and radiological evidence of DDD of the lumbar spine
3. Undergone treatment with the IBFD with autogenous bone graft and/or allogeneic bone graft composed of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone at 1 or 2 contiguous levels from L2 to S1
Exclusion Criteria
2. Surgery with the IBFD(s) at more than 2 contiguous levels
3. Surgery with the IBFD(s) at levels outside the range of L2 to S1
4. Treated with any bone grafting material other than autogenous or allogenic bone graft in the device(s) or surrounding disc space
5. Any contraindications listed in the cleared product labeling
6. Osteoporosis, Other Systemic Bone D.O. T score ≤ -1.5
7. BMI \> 40
8. Systemic Infection
9. H/O IV Drug Use
10. Cancer
18 Years
110 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Spine and Scoliosis Research Associates
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aaron Buckland, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
SSRA Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
New York University Langone Health
New York, New York, United States
Carolina NeuroSurgery & Spine Associates
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Rothman Orthopaedic Institute
Bensalem, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CP-000003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.